Journal of Gastrointestinal Infections

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 1 ( January-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

In Silico Analysis of CRISPR-Cas-mediated Bacteriophage Resistance in Lactobacilli

Praveen P. Balgir, Suman Rani

Keywords : Bacteriophages, Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats associated sequences, Lactobacillus, Spacer

Citation Information : Balgir PP, Rani S. In Silico Analysis of CRISPR-Cas-mediated Bacteriophage Resistance in Lactobacilli. J Gastrointest Infect 2019; 9 (1):15-22.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10068-3031

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Background and objectives: Recent advances in clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR associated sequences (Cas) technology has opened up immense possibilities for improving the gut health and overall immunity of the individual. In development of all these applications, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), which are already a part of human diet, are an attractive vehicle. The technology can utilize the evolutionary perspective of bacterial resistance to phages by this class of bacteria. Thus, the knowledge of CRISPR-based phage resistance in starter cultures is of interest to clinicians as well as food technologists. In the present study, an attempt has been made to explore the presence of CRISPR loci and cas gene clusters in the genomes of Lactobacilli strains available in public databases. A further analysis has been undertaken to identify the spacers left behind by the bacteriophages encountered by Lactobacilli during their evolution. Materials and methods: A total of 174 completed and draft genomes of Lactobacilli strains were analyzed by different online tools like CRISPR-Cas finder and CRISPR-Cas++. Results: Different types of the CRISPR-Cas system found in 58 genomes out of 174 genomes were analyzed. No CRISPR sequences were found in 109 genomes. The analysis yielded type I and type II CRISPR-Cas system in 14 genomes each and type III in 1 genome. The study found 32 bacteriophage spacers in different bacterial genomes that predict the identity of phages infecting the bacterium over its evolutionary history. Interpretation and conclusion: This study is an exploratory one that has predicted the presence of CRISPRs and their diversity across Lactobacillus species.

  1. Yusuf MA, Hamid TH. Lactic acid bacteria: bacteriocin producer: a mini review. IOSR J Pharm 2013;3(4):44–50.
  2. Ringø E, Gatesoupe FJ. Lactic acid bacteria in fish: a review. Aquaculture 1998;160(3–4):177–203. DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(97)00299-8.
  3. Slover CM, Danziger LH. Lactobacillus: a review. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter 2008;30(4):23–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2008.01.006.
  4. Szczepankowska AK, Górecki RK, Kołakowski P, et al. Lactic acid bacteria resistance to bacteriophage and prevention techniques to lower phage contamination in dairy fermentation in Lactic Acid Bacteria - R & D for Food, Health and Livestock Purposes Kongo M InTech; 2013. pp. 23–71.
  5. Börner RA, Kandasamy V, Axelsen AM, et al. Genome editing of lactic acid bacteria: opportunities for food, feed, pharma and biotech. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 2018;366(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fny291.
  6. Mills S, McAuliffe OE, Coffey A, et al. Plasmids of lactococci–genetic accessories or genetic necessities? FEMS Microbiol Rev 2006;30(2):243–273. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2005.00011.x.
  7. Coffey A, Ross RP. Bacteriophage-resistance systems in dairy starter strains: molecular analysis to application. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2002;82(1–4):303–321. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020639717181.
  8. Horvath P, Coûté-Monvoisin AC, Romero DA, et al. Comparative analysis of CRISPR loci in lactic acid bacteria genomes. Int J Food Microbiol 2009;131(1):62–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.05.030.
  9. Horvath P, Barrangou R. CRISPR/cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 2010;327(5962):167–170. DOI: 10.1126/science.1179555.
  10. Karginov FV, Hannon GJ. The CRISPR system: small RNA-guided defense in bacteria and archaea. Mol Cell 2010;37(1):7–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.033.
  11. Makarova KS, Haft DH, Barrangou R, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR–cas systems. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2011;9(6):467–477. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2577.
  12. Shah SA, Garrett RA. CRISPR/cas and Cmr modules, mobility and evolution of adaptive immune systems. Res Microbiol 2011;162(1):27–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.09.001.
  13. Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA. RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature 2012;482(7385):331. DOI: 10.1038/nature10886.
  14. Balgir PP, Rani S, Vishal. Genome editing Gahlawat SK, Duhan JS, Salar RK, et al. Advances in animal biotechnology and its applications. Springer Nature; 2018. pp. 19–31.
  15. Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. The CRISPRdb database and tools to display CRISPRs and to generate dictionaries of spacers and repeats. BMC bioinformatics 2007;8(1):172. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-172.
  16. Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 2007;315(5819):1709–1712. DOI: 10.1126/science.1138140.
  17. Deveau H, Barrangou R, Garneau JE, et al. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol 2008;190(4):1390–1400. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01412-07.
  18. Horvath P, Romero DA, Coûté-Monvoisin AC, et al. Diversity, activity, and evolution of CRISPR loci in streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol 2008;190(4):1401–1412. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01415-07.
  19. Fox PF, McSweeney PL, Cogan TM, et al. Cheese: chemistry, physics and microbiology, vol. 1. General Aspects, Elsevier; 2004.
  20. Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Sorokin A, et al. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology 2005;151(8):2551–2561. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0.
  21. Mojica FJ, García-Martínez J, Soria E. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol 2005;60(2):174–182. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3.
  22. Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C, et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46(W1):W246–W251. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky425.
  23. Makarova KS, Koonin EV. Annotation and classification of CRISPR-cas systems. InCRISPR. New York, NY: Humana Press; 2015. pp. 47–75.
  24. Evivie SE, Huo GC, Igene JO, et al. Some current applications, limitations and future perspectives of lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. Food & Nutrition Research 2017;61(1):1318034. DOI: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1318034.
  25. Klaenhammer TR, de Vos WM. An incredible scientific journey. the evolutionary tale of the lactic acid bacteria. In: Ledeboer A, Hugenholtz J, Kok J, et al. The 10th LAB symposium. Thirty years of research on lactic acid bacteria. Rotterdam: 24 Media Labs; 2011. pp. 1–11.
  26. Crawley AB, Henriksen JR, Barrangou R. CRISPRdisco: an automated pipeline for the discovery and analysis of CRISPR-cas systems. CRISPR J 2018;1(2):171–181.
  27. Makarova KS, Aravind L, Wolf YI, et al. Unification of cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Direct 2011;6(1):38. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-6-38.
  28. Sorek R, Kunin V, Hugenholtz P. CRISPR—a widespread system that provides acquired resistance against phages in bacteria and archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008;6(3):181. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1793.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.