In Vitro Evaluation of a Novel Derivative Combination Antimicrobial Ceftriaxone + Sulbactam + EDTA against Pan-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria at a 1,000-bedded Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Northern India
1–5,7,8Department of Microbiology, Army College of Medical Sciences, Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi, India
6Department of Pathology, Army College of Medical Sciences, Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi, India
9Department of Microbiology, Command Hospital (Central Command), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Corresponding Author: Anuradha Makkar, Department of Microbiology, Army College of Medical Sciences, Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi, India, Phone: +91 9810540843, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
How to cite this article Yadav S, Mangalesh S, Makkar A, et al. In Vitro Evaluation of a Novel Derivative Combination Antimicrobial Ceftriaxone + Sulbactam + EDTA against Pan-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria at a 1,000-bedded Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Northern India. J Med Acad 2020;3(1):11–13.
Source of support: Nil
Conflict of interest: None
Introduction: The global emergence of antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative (GN) species is a major public health concern. The emergence of pan-resistant superbugs has further led to a serious threat to global public health security. The infections with these bacterial strains are associated with prolonged hospitalization, disseminated infections, and mortality. Newer therapeutic strategies are urgently needed to be explored to avoid the problems of developing further resistance.
Aim and objective: Testing of a novel antibiotic combination regimen to investigate the effectiveness in in vitro sensitivity testing against pan-resistant superbugs.
Materials and methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, all pan-resistant, non-repeat, consecutive gram-negative bacteria identified through Vitek 2 compact (Biomerieux, France) automated microbiology system from intensive care unit, acute medical wards, and acute surgical wards were selected. And a novel derivative combination antimicrobial ceftriaxone 30 μg + sulbactam 15 μg + EDTA (CSE) was tested on pan-resistant microbes for possible susceptibility through Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion on Mueller–Hinton agar.
Results: Ceftriaxone + sulbactam + EDTA was found effective in vitro against pan-resistant GN bacterial strains (56.94%). Among these pan-resistant GN bacterial strains, pan-resistant Klebsiella and Proteus strains were found highly susceptible (91% and 87%, respectively) to CSE.
Discussion: Ceftriaxone + sulbactam + EDTA can be effective in treating pan-resistant GN bacterial strains as evident by in vitro susceptibility testing. Multiple centers involving both laboratories and patient care centers are required to coordinate and perform such types of studies to further augment the present knowledge and developing therapeutic options for these resistant superbugs.
Keywords: Ceftriaxone + sulbactam + EDTA, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Gram-negative bacteria, Minimal inhibitory concentrations, Mueller–Hinton agar.
A major breakthrough in medicine in the twentieth century was the discovery of antibiotics, the unguarded usage of which over decades has led to the current crisis of rising antimicrobial resistance. Pan-resistant microorganisms have the highest potential of causing the dreaded “microbial holocaust” of mankind. They are defined as microbes possessing resistance to all the available antimicrobials including colistin and tigecycline.1
The risks that these pan-resistant microbes pose to mankind include disseminated infections, delayed recovery, prolonged hospitalization, increased risk of transmission to other patients, and consequent morbidity and mortality. Moreover, they are capable of colonizing inanimate surfaces and create reservoirs, thus rendering all patients and healthcare professionals at risk.2
Pan resistance, being a global health problem, has been expounded upon by the Chennai declaration in 2013, National Treatment Guidelines in 2016, and Indian Council of Medical Research Guidelines in 2017. Steps have been taken at the global level too, under the aegis of WHO.3
Very few studies have defined and delineated the burden of pan resistance and therapeutic options in the scientific research literature. The rate at which newer molecules are being developed is slow and the ones claimed to be effective need to be evaluated for potential therapeutic options.4
The present study aimed toward in vitro evaluation of a novel derivative combination molecule ceftriaxone + sulbactam + EDTA (CSE) against pan-resistant superbugs at a 1,000-bedded tertiarycare teaching hospital in northern India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2019 to August 2019 at a 1,000-bedded tertiary-care teaching hospital after requisite approvals following all good laboratory sampling, storage, testing, and interpretation practices. All pan-resistant, non-repeat, consecutive gram-negative bacteria (GNB) identified through Vitek 2 compact (Biomerieux, France) automated microbiology system from the intensive care unit, acute medical wards, and acute surgical wards were selected. Patients having infections with susceptible bacteria, gram-positive bacteria, and repeat isolates were excluded.
Vitek 2 compact gram-negative identification cards (GNID) were correlated with respective minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) obtained by Vitek 2 compact antimicrobial susceptibility AST-280 cards for lactose fermenters and AST 281 cards for non-lactose fermenters according to the latest Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.
A novel derivative combination antimicrobial ceftriaxone 30 μg + sulbactam 15 μg + EDTA was tested on pan-resistant microbes for possible susceptibility through Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion on Mueller–Hinton agar. Ceftriaxone + sulbactam + EDTA zone ≥23 mm for Enterobacteriaceae, and ≥21 mm for Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas were considered susceptible.5 Data were analyzed under descriptive statistics using Microsoft Excel.
Pan resistance was observed in 114/2,533 (45%, 95% CI 37.6–53.8%) multidrug-resistant gram-negative (GN) pathogens. The distribution of pan resistance included Proteus mirabilis 44/114 (38.6%, 95% CI 30.2–47.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae 12/114 (10.53%, 95% CI 6.1–17.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 37/114 (32.46%, 95% CI 24.6–31.5%), and Acinetobacter baumannii 21/144 (14.58%, 95% CI 12.4–26.5%). The distribution of wards and samples have been depicted in Table 1 and Figure 1, 82/114 (56.94%, 95% CI 63.1–79.4%) were susceptible to CSE (Table 2).
|S. no.||Pan-resistant pathogen||Ward(s)||Source(s)/sample(s)|
|1||Proteus mirabilis (n = 44)||Intensive care unit, acute medical, acute surgical ward||Pus, necrotic tissue, biopsy tissue, endotracheal tube tip, bile, urine, tracheal aspirate, central venous pressure line|
|2||Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 12)||Intensive care unit, surgical ward||Bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum, central venous catheter tip|
|3||Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 37)||Intensive care unit, surgical ward||Pus, local swab, urine, tube tip, urine, pancreatic fluid|
|4||Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 21)||Intensive care unit||Urine, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage|
The study revealed an increasing incidence of pan resistance in GN Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenters which are increasingly causing healthcare-associated infections, especially encountered in tertiary-care teaching hospitals due to referrals and transfers across various healthcare facilities. Pan resistance develops clinically in vivo due to antimicrobial stress.6 The study is a pilot study for in vitro determination of susceptibility through Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion and can be augmented by microbroth dilutions as attempted for other antimicrobials using Vitek 2 compact for standardization and quality control.
Ceftriaxone + sulbactam + EDTA has been promising in vitro against Klebsiella and Proteus, which are emerging healthcare-associated pathogens. Ceftriaxone + sulbactam + EDTA has as it has EDTA as a cheating agent. Ceftriaxone + sulbactam + EDTA has the potential to become first-line therapy for serious and disseminated infections in tertiary care.7,8
There are limited treatment options for pan-resistant pathogens. Monotherapy in pan resistance is ineffective requiring combination-therapy with high-dose tigecycline and colistin, or imipenem–cilastatin with colistin. Taurolidine and fifth-generation cephalosporins (ceftobiprole, ceftolozane, ceftaroline, etc.) are some new and promising drugs for pan-resistant GNB. However, the supply of these newer antimicrobials against GN pathogens is discouragingly scarce.9
The advances being made toward global public health security are being threatened by rampantly emerging pan resistance. We must recognize this threat and construct an intensive strategy, develop infrastructure, foster expertise, and take coordinated steps to tackle it. The emerging global challenge of pan resistance requires stringent monitoring to control the spread of these organisms across geographical borders. An overwhelming patient population, limited access to health facilities, poor antimicrobial stewardship, and a rising immunocompromised population are the emerging problems faced by developing nations in the tropics. These settings are very significant, as they may form the cradle for emerging pan resistance in the world. There is an imminent need for continuous global surveillance across all geographical regions and serious political commitment.1,9,10
|S. no.||Pan-resistant pathogen||CSE|
|1||Proteus mirabilis (n = 44)||39||05|
|2||Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 12)||11||01|
|3||Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 37)||20||17|
|4||Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 21)||12||11|
Ceftriaxone + sulbactam + EDTA can be effective in treating pan-resistant infections by Enterobacteriaceae and Proteus, as evident by in vitro susceptibility. Multiple centers involving both laboratories and patient care centers are required to coordinate and perform studies to augment the present knowledge and conclude on emerging resistance.
1. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, et al. Multidrug resistant, extensively drug resistant and pan-drug resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infec 2012;18(3):268–281. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x.
2. Khan ID, Rajmohan KS, Jindal AK, et al. Panresistant superbugs: are we at the edge of a “microbial holocaust”. Int J Med Med Res 2017;3(2):39–44. DOI: 10.11603/IJMMR.2413-6077.2017.2.8012.
3. World Health Organization. WHO Model list of Essential Medicines. 20th List (March 2017). http://www.who.int.medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en/ .Accessed 20 Aug 2019.
4. Khan ID, Sahni AK, Bharadwaj R, et al. Emerging organisms in a tertiary healthcare set up. Med J Armed Forces India 2014;70(2):120–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.09.005.
5. Prabhu M, Arora M, Ruttonji Z, et al. Determination of susceptibility breakpoints of elores in ESBL and MBL producing Acinetobacter species. Int J Contemp Med Res 2017;4(2):393–399.
6. Khan ID, Basu A, Kiran S, et al. Device-associated healthcare associated infections (DA-HAI) and the caveat of multiresistance in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit. Med J Armed Forces India 2017;73(3):222–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.10.008.
7. Chaudhary M, Payasi A. Clinical, microbial efficacy and tolerability of elores, a novel antibiotic adjuvant entity in ESBL producing pathogens: prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Pharmacy Res 2013;7(4):275–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopr.2013.04.017.
8. Sathe P, Maddani S, Kulkarni S, et al. Management of ventilator associated pneumonia with a new antibiotic adjuvant entity (ceftriaxone+sulbactam+disodiumedetate) - a novel approach to spare carbapenems. J Crit Care 2017;41:145–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.002.
9. Jindal AK, Pandya K, Khan ID. Antimicrobial resistance: a public health challenge. Med J Armed Forces India 2014;71(2):178–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.04.011.
10. National Centre for Disease Control, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt of India. Revised Hospital Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines. www.ncdc.gov.in/mainlinkfile/file571.
© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.