Journal of Medical Academics

Register      Login

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Critical Evaluation of Role of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in Guiding Surgical Management of Clinically Negative Neck (CN0) in Carcinoma Oral Cavity

AK Tyagi, Abhishek Sharma

Keywords : Carcinoma oral cavity, Node-negative neck, Singlecenter prospective study, Supra-omohyoid neck dissection.

Citation Information : Tyagi A, Sharma A. Critical Evaluation of Role of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in Guiding Surgical Management of Clinically Negative Neck (CN0) in Carcinoma Oral Cavity. Journal of Medical Academics 2018; 1 (1):22-25.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10070-0005

License: NA

Published Online: 01-04-2018

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

Aim: Carcinoma oral cavity ranks third in the incidence of freshly detected cancers among both the genders. The most impactful prognostic factor in carcinoma oral cavity is the presence of cervical lymph node metastasis. Clinically node negative neck harbors occult metastasis in 06 to 46% of cases. The gold standard currently of managing cN0 neck is Supra Omohyoid neck dissection (SOHND). However, various imaging modalities are challenging the gold standard. The present NCCN guidelines incorporate clinical palpation, USG Neck and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in evaluating the nodal status of such patients. This study has critically evaluated, whether USG/CECT is sufficient in the clinically node-negative neck (cN0), in patients with an early stage carcinoma oral cavity or do we need to add other investigations in evaluating the nodal status. Materials and methods: A single-center prospective study of 51 patients of early stage carcinoma oral cavity with cNo neck underwent evaluation of the neck by ultrasonography (USG) and CECT in a tertiary care center. All patients subsequently underwent SOHND and the results were compared. Results: Fifty-eight neck sides were dissected (44 unilateral, 7 bilateral), involving a total of 885 lymph nodes (mean, 15.26 lymph nodes per neck side). Histopathologic analysis revealed occult lymph node metastases in 10 of 51 patients (19.6%) which equated to 10 of 58 neck sides (17.24%). The sensitivity and specificity of USG was 40% and 97.8% respectively with a diagnostic accuracy of 87.9%. CECT neck was found to be a better diagnostic modality with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 87.5%. Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is a better modality than USG and clinical palpation. However, we recommend further studies with other modalities like PET–CT, and lymphangoscinitigraphy.


PDF Share
  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013
  2. Shah JP. Patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg 1990;160:405-409.
  3. Po Wing Yuen A, Lam KY, Lam LK, et al. Prognostic factors of clinically stage I and II oral tongue carcinoma - a comparative study of stage, thickness, shape, growth pattern, invasive front malignancy grading, Martinez-Gimeno score, and pathologic features. Head Neck 2002;24:513–520
  4. Veness M, Morgan G, Sathiyaseelan Y, Gebski V: Anterior tongue cancer and the incidence of cervical lymph node metastases with increasing tumour thickness: Should elective treatment to the neck be standard practice in all patients? ANZ J Surg 2005;75:101-105.
  5. Weiss MH, Harrison LB, Isaacs RS. Use of decision analysis in planning a management strategy for the stage N0 neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:699-702.
  6. Van den Brekel MW, Castelijns JA, Stel HV, et al. Occult metastatic neck disease: detection with US and US-guidedfineneedle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1992;180:457-461.
  7. D'Cruz AK, Vaish R, Kapre N. et al, Elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in node-negative oral cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:521-529.
  8. Van den Hoogen FJA, Westerbeek BC, Joosten FB, Bruaset I, Marres HA. Supraomohyoid neck dissection in the ultrasonographically and clinically negative neck in oral carcinoma. Clin Otolaryngol 2001;26:340
  9. Keski-Säntti H, Atula T, Törnwall J, Koivunen P, Mäkitie A. Elective neck treatment versus observation in patients with T1/T2 N0 squamous cell carcinoma of oral tongue. Oral Oncol 2006;42:96-101
  10. Capote A, Escorial V, Muñoz-Guerra MF, Rodríguez-Campo FJ, Gamallo C, Naval L. Elective neck dissection in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma – does it influence recurrence and survival? Head Neck 2007;29:3-11.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.