Removal Efficiency of Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal Medicament with Er:YAG Laser: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

JOURNAL TITLE: International Journal of Laser Dentistry

Author
1. Ourania Pantelidou
2. Antonis Kallis
ISSN
2249-5614
DOI
10.5005/jp-journals-10022-1082
Volume
6
Issue
1
Publishing Year
2016
Pages
7
  • Article keywords

    Abstract

    Aim

    This ex vivo study compared the efficiency of Er:YAG laser to remove calcium hydroxide from root canal walls, especially from the apical third, with manual and ultrasonic irrigation technique by using a scanning electron microscopic (SEM).

    Materials and methods

    Sixty-four single-rooted teeth were divided into 3 groups of 20 teeth each. The rest 4 teeth were used as control groups (2 positive and 2 negative control group). After coronal access, all teeth were instrumented by Protaper Next rotary files (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) up to size F3, followed an irrigation protocol and filled with pure calcium hydroxide powder mixed with saline. Teeth were stored in an incubator for 7 days and then calcium hydroxide was removed using 3 techniques: Manually (group I), by ultrasonic irrigation (group II), by laser Er:YAG and x-pulse tip (group III). The teeth of control groups were instrumented as the experimental groups; no removal technique was applied in positive group, whereas in negative one, the root canals were left empty. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally and observed under SEM. Results were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test.

    Results

    The results showed significant difference between laser and the other two groups in coronal and middle root third, but no statistic difference in apical third.

    Conclusion

    Laser improved the removal of calcium hydroxide in comparison with conventional techniques.

    How to cite this article

    Kourti E, Pantelidou O, Kallis A. Removal Efficiency of Calcium Hydroxide Intracanal Medicament with Er:YAG Laser: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study. Int J Laser Dent 2016;6(1):24-30.

    © 2019 Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.   |   All Rights Reserved