Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems Using New-generation Adhesives

JOURNAL TITLE: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Author
1. Güliz Görgül
2. Bagdagül Helvacioglu Kivanç
ISSN
DOI
10.5005/jcdp-9-7-33
Volume
9
Issue
7
Publishing Year
2008
Pages
8
Author Affiliations
    1. Dr. Görgül is a Professor in department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics at the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of Gazi in Ankara, Turkey where she received her graduate training in Endodontics. She is a member of Turkish Endodontic Society and the European Endodontic Society. Dr. Görgül is the corresponding author for this paper. email: guliz@gazi.edu.tr
    1. Dr. Kivanç is a Teaching Assistant in the Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey. She is a member of the Turkish Endodontic Society and the European Endodontic Society. e-mail: bagdagul@gazi.edu.tr
  • Article keywords

    Abstract

    Aim

    The aim of this study was to investigate the fracture strength of three post systems cemented with a dual cure composite resin luting cement by using different adhesive systems.

    Methods and Materials

    In this study 63 extracted anterior teeth with single roots were endodontically prepared and filled. Teeth were randomly assigned to one of three post systems placed into the prepared canals: Group I - titanium posts (n=21) (Filpost); Group II - glass fiber posts (n=21) (Mirafit White); and Group III zirconia posts (n=21) (CosmoPost). Each group was again randomly divided into three subgroups according to the bonding materials used [Single Bond (n=7), Clearfil SE Bond (n=7), and Prompt L Pop (n=7)]. A dual cured resin cement (Rely X ARC) was used for bonding the posts into the root canals. Standard cores were made by a composite resin (Clearfil Photocore) using core build-ups. The samples were tested in the compression test machine for 1 mm/min and fracture resistance of the teeth were recorded. The data was analyzed by using twoway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's New Multiple Range Tests. A significance level of p<.05 was used for all comparisons.

    Results

    There was a significant difference in fracture resistance between the post systems (p<0.05) and the interaction of adhesive resins and post systems (p<0.05). Mirafit White was more resistant to fracture than other groups; Filpost showed the least resistance to fracture. CosmoPost post system bonded with Single Bond recorded the lowest fracture resistance (p<0.05).

    Conclusion

    Endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with glass fiber posts exhibited higher failure loads than teeth restored with zirconia and titanium posts. Self-etching adhesives are better alternatives to etch-andrinse adhesive systems for luting post systems.

    Clinical Significance

    Under the condition of this study, glass fiber posts are preferable to restore endodontically treated anterior teeth.

    Citation

    Kivanç BH, Görgül G. Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems Using Newgeneration Adhesives. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 November; (9)7:033-040.

    © 2019 Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.   |   All Rights Reserved