Prevalence of Additional Canals in Maxillary First Molars in a Nigerian Population

JOURNAL TITLE: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Author
1. Oluwole O. Dosumu
2. Iyabo M. Funmilayo Abiodun-Solanke
3. Peter O. Shaba
4. Deborah M. Ajayi
ISSN
DOI
10.5005/jcdp-9-7-81
Volume
9
Issue
7
Publishing Year
2008
Pages
8
Author Affiliations
    1. Dr. Dosumu is a Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Removable Prosthodontics in the Department of Restorative Dentistry of the Faculty of Dentistry, College of Medicine at the University of ibadan in ibadan, Nigeria. e-mail: smiledental@consultant.com
    1. Dr. Abiodun-Solank is a Lecturer/Consultant in the Department of Restorative Dentistry of the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. e-mail: abisolimf@yahoo.ca
    1. Dr. Shaba is a Senior Lecturer/Consultant in the Department of Restorative Dentistry of the College of Medicine at the University of Lagos in Lagos, Nigeria.
    1. Dr. Ajayi is a Lecturer/Consultant in the Department of Restorative Dentistry of the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Article keywords

    Abstract

    Aim

    The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of additional canals in maxillary first molars in a selected population in Nigeria.

    Methods and Materials

    One hundred extracted teeth were collected from the Pedodontic and Oral Surgery clinics of the University College Hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. The teeth were identified and their root planed to remove adherent soft tissues. Each tooth was sectioned at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and then again at 2 mm below the CEJ. The number of canals present in each root was noted. For the clinical aspect of the study, 30 patients with clinical and radiological evidence of pulpal involvement participated in the study. These patients had root canal therapy performed on their maxillary first molars and the number of canals was confirmed with periapical radiographs.

    Results

    In the laboratory phase of the study 77% of the teeth sectioned had three canals while 22% had four canals with the fourth canal being a second mesiobuccal canal. Only one tooth had five canals with two canals in the palatal root, two canals in the mesiobuccal root, and the remaining canal in the distobuccal root. For the clinical phase of the study, 29 (96.7%) out of 30 patients treated had three canals while only one (3.3%) had four canals with the fourth canal being a second mesiobuccal canal.

    Conclusion

    Clinicians should assume there are additional canals in each root when performing endodontic therapy on the maxillary first molar. Only after a thorough search for extra canals and after it is determined further preparation would be fruitless or could cause perforation should the clinician proceed with treating only one canal per root.

    Clinical Significance

    If root canal therapy fails, it may be due to the existence of an extra canal that was not located and treated in the first place. This should be considered carefully during re-treatment either by surgical or non-surgical methods.

    Citation

    Abiodun-Solanke IMF, Dosumu OO, Shaba PO, Ajayi DM. Prevalence of Additional Canals in Maxillary First Molars in a Nigerian Population. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 November; (9)7:081-088.

    © 2019 Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.   |   All Rights Reserved