Recent Advances in Pediatrics (Special Volume 15): Pediatric Nephrology Suraj Gupte
INDEX
×
Chapter Notes

Save Clear


Principles of Prenatal Diagnosis, Intervention and Neonatal Evaluation1

Carlos A Angel,
Jeffrey Spier,
Justin Green
 
INTROUCTION
Renal abnormalities represent approximately 17% of all prenatally detected anomalies. In order to place prenatal diagnosis of fetal urinary anomalies in the proper context, a brief review of the chronology of critical events that take place during the development of the fetal urinary tract is in order.1, 2
 
EMBRYOLOGY OF THE URINARY TRACT
While embryonic development in the first 10 weeks is devoted to organogenesis, the rest of the pregnancy is devoted to growth, maturation and the development of function. The ureteric bud, a diverticulum that arises from the lower portion of the mesonephric ducts, appears at the 5th week of gestation and interacts with the metanephric blastema (the sacral portion of the intermediate mesoderm) to induce nephrogenesis. This process continues throughout gestation and is completed by 36 weeks.
Failure of development of the ureteric bud results in renal agenesis. If the bud misses its target, abnormal nephrogenesis is induced resulting in a dysplastic kidney. It is theorized that abnormal induction of the metanephric blastema by a low ureteric bud that reaches the urogenital sinus too early results in lateral displacement of the ureteral orifices and vesicoureteral reflux due to a foreshortened submucosal tunnel. This explains the common association of reflux and renal dysplasia.
A bud arising higher on the mesonephric duct arrives at the urogenital sinus later in gestation, resulting in distal, ectopic ureters that are often obstructive and associated with renal dysplasia.3 Duplex kidneys, the most common of the renal anomalies, occur when two ureteric buds induce development of both an upper and a lower pole renal moiety. If a single bud divides close to its origin, the result is an incomplete duplication.
2
zoom view
Fig. 1.1: Sonographic appearance of a horseshoe kidney at 32 weeks
The embryonic kidney has a lobulated external appearance and ascends from its pelvic position during 6 to 9 weeks. This ascent results primarily from accelerated longitudinal (cephalocaudal) growth of the embryo. During its ascent, the pelvic kidney faces anteriorly and rotates about 90 degrees leaving the hilum facing anteromedially in the renal fossa. Ectopic kidneys fail to ascend, rotate, or both, and may have an anomalous blood supply.
If two kidneys come together in the pelvis during their development, they may fuse and fail to rotate. The most common anomaly of fusion is the horseshoe kidney (Fig. 1.1).
Partition of the cloaca begins at about 28 days of gestation, along with the appearance of the ureteric bud. This division is complete by the 6th week, separating the urogenital sinus, which is anterior, from the rectum, which is placed posteriorly. The upper part of this primitive urogenital sinus will form the bladder. By 13 weeks of gestation, the circular and longitudinal fibers of smooth muscle that form the trigone are discernible. This process continues to advance for three weeks during which the inner and outer longitudinal layers and the middle circular layer that will allow continence develop. By week 21, a definite urothelium is visible. In females, the distal part of the primitive urogenital sinus gives rise to the urethra and the vestibule of the vagina, and in males to the posterior urethra. The anterior urethra results from fusion of the urethral folds.
Anomalies of the urogenital membrane and partitioning of the cloaca may result in bladder extrophy, with a small, open bladder plate, diastasis of the pubic bones, anterior vagina in females, epipadias in males and a low umbilicus; extrophy of the cloaca, in which each of the lateral bladder plates is joined in the midline by the hindgut; or persistence of the cloaca with confluence of the genitourinary and digestive tracts into a common channel.4
3
 
BIOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF FETAL UROPATHY
Fetal urine composition is an indicator of renal function. During fetal life, nutrients are supplied to the fetus by the mother through the placental circulation and fetal homeostasis is assured without intervention of the fetal kidneys. Fetal urine, therefore, depends exclusively on fetal renal function and reflects renal potential.5 The pioneering work of Harrison’s group in the 1980s in the evaluation and treatment of fetuses with obstructive uropathy focused on the establishment of prognostic parameters to select the best candidates for inutero intervention.
Progressive renal deterioration with increased loss of electrolytes in fetal urine is associated with a poor prognosis.6 Transabdominal samples of fetal urine showed that renal function was good when sodium was below 100 mmol/L, chloride below 90 mmol/L, and osmolality below 210 mOsm/L. These cut-off values were later confirmed by other investigators.7-9 However, these values do not take into account changes seen in fetal urinary electrolytes with advancing gestation.10 A major source of error is contamination of fetal urine with gastrointestinal secretions or maternal urine. Potassium should always be measured, since values > 5 mmol/L indicate that the sample is of maternal origin and not reliable. Other constituents of fetal urine found to have predictive value in patients with renal dysplasia include calcium (> 8 mg/dl), beta 2-microglobulin, and cystatin C.
The beta 2-microglobulin concentration possibly provides the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity for establishing the prognosis of live-born infants with normal versus abnormal postnatal serum creatinine values. Levels > 4 mg/L are predictive of renal dysplasia and renal failure by 1 year of age, and levels >13 mg/L are uniformly associated with a fatal outcome.11,12 Cystatin C, with a molecular weight of 13.3 kD, does not cross the placenta and is normally absent from fetal urine since it is filtered by the glomerulus and reabsorbed and metabolized by the tubules. A significant correlation between fetal urinary cystatin C levels and postnatal serum creatinine concentration at one year has been established.6,13
 
IMAGING TOOLS IN PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
 
Sonography
Although fetal kidneys can initially be imaged starting at 9 weeks of gestation with transvaginal probes and about 80% can be identified by 11 to 12 weeks, most studies are performed in the second trimester (20–22 weeks) as part of the routine screening for fetal anomalies. By this time, the kidneys are visible during a transabdominal examination in >90% of the patients (Fig. 1.2 and Fig. 1.3).
4
zoom view
Fig. 1.2: Transverse sonographic view of normal kidneys at 31 weeks
zoom view
Fig. 1.3: Doppler study confirms the presence of bilateral renal arteries in the second trimester
Early in gestation fetal kidneys are uniformly echogenic; as gestation progresses, corticomedullary differentiation becomes visible and by 18 to 22 weeks the renal pelves and calyceal patterns can be identified. Fetal urine production begins at about 13 weeks of gestation, at which time the fetal bladder becomes apparent. Absence of the bladder at 15 weeks of gestation is considered abnormal.14
Although the spectrum of genitourinary anomalies that can be detected with prenatal ultrasound is quite broad, one must keep in mind that sonography provides only anatomical information and is of limited value in predicting fetal renal function. Estimation of amniotic fluid volume, however, is a reliable prognostic indicator. Oligohydramnios, especially when accompanied by pulmonary hypoplasia, is associated with decreased survival and poor renal function after birth.
By 12 to 14 weeks, detection of genitourinary conditions such as bilateral renal agenesis, hydronephrosis, muticystic dyspalstic kidneys, prune-belly syndrome, megacystis and pulmonary hypoplasia have been reported.
5
Table 1.1   Fitted 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th and 97th centiles of kidney anteroposterior diameter at 14 to 42 exact weeks of gestation with the number of fetuses for completed weeks of gestation.
Weeks of gestation
Fitted centiles
N
3rd
10th
50th
90th
97th
SD*
14
3
7.5
8.0
9.3
10.8
11.6
0.12
15
3
8.8
9.5
11.0
12.8
13.7
0.12
16
2
10.2
11.0
12.7
14.8
15.8
0.12
17
12
11.6
12.5
14.5
16.8
18.1
0.12
18
10
13.1
14.1
16.3
18.9
20.3
0.12
19
15
14.6
15.6
18.2
21.1
22.6
0.12
20
15
16.1
17.2
20.0
23.2
24.9
0.12
21
15
17.5
18.8
21.8
25.4
27.2
0.12
22
14
19.0
20.4
23.6
27.4
29.4
0.12
23
16
20.4
21.9
25.4
29.5
31.6
0.12
24
17
21.8
23.4
27.1
31.5
33.8
0.12
25
18
23.1
24.8
28.8
33.4
35.8
0.12
26
20
24.4
26.2
30.4
35.3
37.8.
0.12
27
24
25.6
27.5
31.9
37.1
39.7
0.12
28
18
26.8
28.7
33.4
38.7
41.5
0.12
29
19
27.9
29.9
34.7
40.3
43.2
0.12
30
19
28.9
31.0
36.0
41.8
44.8
0.12
31
23
29.9
32.1
37.2
43.2
46.3
0.12
32
23
30.8
33.0
38.3
44.5
47.7
0.12
33
22
31.6
33.9
39.4
45.7
49.0
0.12
34
19
32.4
34.7
40.3
46.8
50.2
0.12
35
20
33.1
35.4
41.1
47.8
51.2
0.12
36
23
33.7
36.1
41.9
48.7
52.2
0.12
37
14
34.2
36.7
42.6
49.4
53.0
0.12
38
17
34.7
37.2
43.2
50.1
53.8
0.12
39
13
35.1
37.6
43.7
50.7
54.4
0.12
40
14
35.4
38.0
44.1
51.2
54.9
0.12
41
26
35.7
38.3
44.5
51.6
55.4
0.12
42
17
36.0
38.6
44.8
52.0
55.7
0.12
Total
471
*SD: Standard deviation of log of measurement (constant)
From Chitty LS, Altman DG. Charts of fetal size kidney and renal pelvis measurements. Prenat Diagn 2003;23:891–7.Copyright John Wiley and Sons Limited. Reproduced with permission
Since many genetic syndromes can be diagnosed in the first trimester using biochemical, cytogenetic and molecular techniques, the addition of accurate sonographic data will facilitate counseling, particularly with respect to termination of pregnancy.15 A number of charts of fetal renal size are available (Tables 1.1 and 1.2).16,17 Prenatal identification and measurement of the kidney size early in gestation is particularly relevant in the diagnosis of unilateral functioning kidneys and in the presence of obstructive uropathy; compensatory renal hypertrophy (length >95% upper limit) has been demonstrated in association with unilateral renal agenesis and posterior urethral valves by sonography performed between 13 and 22 weeks of gestation.17
6
Table 1.2   Fitted 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th and 97th centiles of kidney antero-posterior diameter at 14 to 42 exact weeks of gestation with the number of fetuses for completed weeks of gestation.
Weeks of gestation
Fitted centiles
N
3rd
10th
50th
90th
97th
SD*
14
4
4.6
5.2
6.5
8.3
9.2
0.18
15
3
5.4
6.0
7.6
9.6
10.7
0.18
16
2
6.2
6.9
8.6
10.9
12.1
0.18
17
13
7.0
7.8
9.7
12.2
13.6
0.18
18
11
7.8
8.7
10.8
13.6
15.1
0.18
19
17
8.6
9.5
11.9
14.9
16.6
0.17
20
16
9.4
10.4
13.0
16.3
18.0
0.17
21
16
10.2
11.3
14.1
17.5
19.4
0.17
22
17
11.0
12.2
15.1
18.8
20.8
0.17
23
17
11.8
13.0
16.1
20.0
22.1
0.17
24
20
12.5
13.8
17.1
21.1
23.3
0.17
25
16
13.2
14.6
18.0
22.2
24.5
0.16
26
18
13.9
15.4
18.9
23.2
25.6
0.16
27
22
14.6
16.1
19.7
24.2
26.6
0.16
28
17
15.2
16.7
20.5
25.1
27.6
0.16
29
16
15.8
17.4
21.2
25.9
28.4
0.16
30
17
16.4
18.0
21.9
26.7
29.2
0.15
31
21
16.9
18.5
22.5
27.3
29.9
0.15
32
21
17.4
19.0
23.1
27.9
30.6
0.15
33
20
17.8
19.5
23.6
28.5
31.2
0.15
34
19
18.2
19.9
24.0
29.0
31.6
0.15
35
18
18.6
20.3
24.4
29.4
32.1
0.14
36
18
18.9
20.6
24.8
29.7
32.4
0.14
37
11
19.2
20.9
25.1
30.0
32.7
0.14
38
14
19.5
21.2
25.3
30.3
32.9
0.14
39
11
19.7
21.4
25.5
30.5
33.1
0.14
40
13
19.9
21.6
25.7
30.6
33.2
0.14
41
22
20.1
21.8
25.8
30.7
33.2
0.13
42
15
20.2
21.9
25.9
30.7
33.2
0.13
Total
445
*SD: Fitted standard deviation of log of measurement
From Chitty LS, Altman DG. Charts of fetal size kidney and renal pelvis measurements. Prenat Diagn 2003;23:891–7.Copyright John Wiley and Sons Limited. Reproduced with permission
Detection of alterations in the size and morphology of the kidney prior to birth may provide useful prognostic information. Unfortunately, it has not yet been conclusively demonstrated that prenatal diagnosis of renal anomalies decreases postnatal morbidity by allowing 7early intervention, and longitudinal studies to answer this question are sorely needed. It almost seems that a great number of minor anomalies of questionable clinical significance are being detected, posing a management dilemma for the pediatrician with respect to further investigation and follow-up of these conditions. Pelviectasis is the most common antenatally detected renal anomaly. At least in some cases, non-progressive pelviectasis detected in utero may be a different disorder than the obstructive uropathy discovered later in life is association with an abdominal mass, urinary tract infections, hypertension and other symptoms of renal dysfunction.18
 
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be ideally suited for prenatal diagnosis since it lacks ionizing radiation, provides excellent soft tissue contrast, and the images can be studied in various orientations. No adverse effects of the magnetic field have been reported in the developing fetus.19-21
However, most authors recommend limiting the examination time and avoiding MRI in the first trimester. Currently, MRI is utilized if a fetal anomaly is detected by sonography but cannot be clearly defined in spite of high-resolution ultrasound probes and Doppler techniques, and further diagnostic information is considered advisable. Using ultrafast, T2-weighted acquisition techniques, images can be obtained in the fetal axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. The study time is shortened and fetal motion artifact is largely eliminated. In many instances, sonographic information can be confirmed with great certainty on MRI studies and additional MRI data aids in prenatal counseling and in therapeutic decisions concerning the fate of the pregnancy.
MRI imaging has been superior to sonography when the pathology is located in the retroperitoneum, as in the evaluation of masses of renal and extrarenal origin, adrenal hemorrhage, mesoblastic nephroma, renal agenesis in association with oligohydramnios (that makes ultrasound evaluation difficult) and in cases of myelomeningocele where documentation of a connection of an extracorporeal cyst with the spinal canal is mandatory.19,22
 
PRENATALLY-DETECTED RENAL AND UROLOGICAL ABNORMALITIES
 
Pelviectasis
Pelviectasis is one of the most common findings on prenatal sonography. Mild fetal pelviectasis has been reported to have an association with aneuploidy, in particular Down’s syndrome,23 and postnatal genitourinary pathology. Chromosomal abnormalities are more likely 8when extrarenal malformations are also detected. The finding of a dilated renal pelvis in the fetus should prompt a careful and thorough investigation for markers of aneuploidy or other structural abnormalities. Pelviectasis detected in the second trimester should be reevaluated for progression in the third trimester.
Potential causes of antenatal pelviectasis or hydronephrosis include ureteropelvic junction obstruction, duplication with ectopic ureters or ureteroceles, ureterovesical junction obstruction, vesicoureteral reflux, and bladder outlet obstruction due to posterior urethral valves or urethral atresia. Often, mild pelviectasis represents physiologic dilatation or just a normal variant in the fetus. One study using transvaginal ultrasound found great variation in fetal hydronephrosis throughout gestation.24 Renal pelvis dilatation can also vary in the same child over a short time depending on the hydration status of the mother or the baby and the state of the bladder (full vs empty).25
On ultrasound, the anteroposterior (AP) diameter provides the most accurate measurement of the renal pelvis to document dilatation; this is easy to obtain and has excellent sensitivity (Figs 1.4 and 1.5). It is not yet clear as to what measurement should be considered abnormal. Traditionally, an AP diameter > 10 mm after 28 weeks of gestation was considered abnormal.26 Recent data suggest that the upper limit in late pregnancy for the AP diameter is 7 mm.18 Some authors advocate that by lowering the threshold to 4 mm before 33 weeks gestation and >7mm subsequently, more abnormalities are found, including a higher detection rate for vesicoureteral reflux.27,28
zoom view
Fig. 1.4: Bilateral pelviectasis with measurement of AP diameters in a fetus at 36 weeks
9
zoom view
Fig. 1.5: Bilateral pelviectasis with measurement of AP diameters in a fetus at 25 weeks
Characteristics on ultrasound that are associated with true pathology include progression of pelviectasis throughout gestation, AP diameter greater than 7mm in the 3rd trimester, increased cortical echogenicity with or without cysts, lower tract dilatation, and caliectasis.26,29 A recent study30 has also looked at the resistive index (RI) of fetal interlobar arteries since the RI is found to be increased with obstruction and is normal in cases of physiologic dilatation. These authors recommend further evaluation for a pathologic cause of obstruction if the RI is elevated.
As mentioned above, multiple studies have indicated a link between dilation of the renal pelvis and chromosomal abnormalities.23,31,32 A prospective trial evaluating this association31 focused on renal pelvic dilatation and other known risk factors for chromosomal abnormalities (advanced maternal age, low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein levels, other structural anomalies in the fetus) and found a 3.9 fold increased risk of Down’s syndrome over the maternal age risk in the presence of pelviectasis. Moreover, a 3.3-fold increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities in general was reported when isolated pelviectasis was 10present. An incidence of chromosomal anomalies ranging from 12 to 19% has been reported in patients with antenatal pelviectasis; three-fourths of these were trisomies, particularly trisomy 21 and trisomy 13. These data indicate that in the presence of pelviectasis, care must be taken to look for other structural abnormalities in the fetus (CNS, limbs, cardiac, etc.) that would suggest a chromosomal anomaly. This information is important given the greatly increased potential for perinatal loss in fetuses with chromosomal anomalies.
While perinatal mortality of children with isolated antenatal pelviectasis has been reported to range from 5 to 32%, the additional presence of chromosomal abnormalities increases the mortality rate above 70%. The risk of death is increased 11 fold if there is associated oligohydramnios.33,34
When deciding on the need for amniocentesis in a woman over 30 years of age who is carrying a fetus with pelviectasis, it is important to bear in mind that the risks of chromosomal abnormalities often exceed those of amniocentesis.
 
Vesicoureteral Reflux
Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), defined as abnormal retrograde flow of urine from the bladder into the upper urinary tracts, can be primary or secondary. Primary VUR can result from one or more of the following: a deficiency in the muscular backing of the intramural ureter, lateral insertion of the ureter into the bladder with a foreshortened submucosal tunnel so that a flap valve effect is lost when the bladder is full, an abnormal trigone, and an overly-enlarged ureteral orifice.35 Secondary reflux can be caused by elevated intravesical pressures as seen in patients with bladder outlet obstruction (posterior urethral valves, urethral atresia), or neurogenic bladders. VUR can also be associated with duplex systems, prune-belly syndrome, multicystic dysplastic kidneys (MCDK), or ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The incidence of postnatally-detected VUR associated with prenatal hydronephrosis ranges from 10 to 40%.36-39
 
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction, defined as obstruction between the renal pelvis and the ureter, is the most common cause of prenatal hydronephrosis40 with an overall incidence (detected by prenatal sonography) of 1 in 500 live births.41 UPJ obstruction is more common in males and is unilateral in 70% of the cases. Bilateral UPJ obstruction is usually asymmetric. The majority of UPJ obstructions appear to be caused by functional rather than anatomical factors.
11
zoom view
Fig. 1.6: Sonographic appearance of unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction at 31 weeks
Evaluation of obstructed segments by electron microscopy has shown abnormal arrangement of smooth muscle cell layers and replacement of muscle by abundant collagen.42 Less common causes of UPJ obstruction include fibrous adhesions, kinks in the ureter, ureteral valves, and aberrant vessels.43 Multicystic kidneys are believed to represent the far end of the spectrum of UPJ obstruction; these kidneys become dysplastic as opposed to hydronephrotic because of the severity of the obstruction.42 Associated urologic anomalies include vesicoureteral reflux, horseshoe kidney, contralateral renal agenesis, meatal stenosis and hypospadias.40 On prenatal ultrasound, UPJ obstruction appears as a dilated renal pelvis with normal ureter and bladder (Fig. 1.6). The degree of renal pelviectasis or pelvicalyectasis is variable. In severe cases, the calyces are severely blunted and there is thinning of the renal parenchyma. The amount of amniotic fluid is usually normal if the contralateral kidney is not involved. It is often difficult to prenatally determine the exact etiology of hydronephrosis, since one cannot rule out other causes such as vesicoureteral reflux until after birth. Serial scans during pregnancy are useful to monitor the progress of pelvic dilatation. Oligohydramnios, in association with bilateral involvement and increased echogenicity, indicates a poor prognosis.
 
Ureterovesical Junction Obstruction
Ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJ) refers to an anatomic or functional obstruction at the point of entry of the ureter into the bladder.12 UVJ obstruction is bilateral in 13% of the cases and predominantly affects males.44 These obstructions have been attributed to partial ureteral atresia or an abnormal angle of implantation of the ureter into the bladder.45,46 In many instances a functional obstruction is present, due to an abnormal arrangement of circular and longitudinal smooth muscle fibers and increased deposition of collagen in the distal ureter resulting in lack of effective peristalsis. UVJ obstruction is associated with duplicated renal systems and ureteroceles. Sonographically, the ureter is dilated and appears as a serpiginous, anechoic, cystic structure in the abdomen and behind the urinary bladder.40 The bladder usually appears unremarkable except in cases with intravesical ureteroceles. Amniotic fluid volume is normal. It is often hard to distinguish UVJ obstruction in utero from other causes of hydroureters such as vesicoureteral reflux, prune-belly syndrome, or posterior urethral valves, and further diagnostic studies are required after birth.
 
Posterior Urethral Valves
Posterior urethral valves (PUV), found exclusively in males, result form thin mucosal folds in the posterior urethra that obstruct the flow of urine at the bladder outlet. This condition is the most common cause of lower urinary tract obstruction in male infants and has a reported incidence between 1 in 8000 47 and 1 in 25,000 live male births.48 Patients with PUV develop renal and bladder dysfunction. The mortality rate in patients with PUV in earlier series was 50%, however, over the last two decades it has dropped to < 5% 49,50 and pulmonary hypoplasia is now the leading cause of death.51 Although the mortality rate has declined, approximately one-third of patients will develop chronic renal insufficiency.49,52 Differential diagnosis includes urethral atresia and prune-belly syndrome. Approximately 10 to 65% of PUV will be detected on prenatal ultrasound.52,53 Urologic anomalies resulting from PUV are usually not detected prior to 24 weeks gestation.54 On ultrasound, characteristic findings include bilateral hydronephrosis, hydroureter, a bladder that stays full or empties incompletely, thickened bladder wall, dilated posterior urethra and various degrees of oligohydramnios (Figs 1.7 to 1.9). Amniotic fluid volume is preser-ved in the first trimester, since prior to 16 weeks of gestation the fluid is not primarily of renal origin. In most large series, oligohydramnios is present in less than half of the cases of suspected urethral valves. A persistently dilated bladder with bilateral hydroureters is very suggestive of PUV and must be followed closely throughout pregnancy. With severe obstruction, progressive worsening of oligohydramnios and increased renal echogenicity with loss of corticomedullary differentiation is seen.
13
zoom view
Fig. 1.7: Dilated ureter seen in a second trimester sonogram in a patient with posterior urethral valves confirmed at birth
zoom view
Fig. 1.8: Unilateral hydronephrosis evident during second trimester sonogram in a patient with posterior urethral valves confirmed at birth
Renal dysplasia is often present in patients with posterior urethral valves and is characterized by increased renal echogenicity, loss of corticomedullary differentiation and subcortical cysts. The obstructed upper urinary tract may spontaneously decompress giving rise to urinary ascites or perinephric urinoma. PUV can be differentiated from prune-belly syndrome by the sonographic characteristics of the bladder, which is thick-walled and tense with PUV and floppy and thin-walled in prune-belly syndrome (Figs 1.10 and 1.11). Urethral atresia may be difficult to differentiate from PUV on prenatal ultrasound.55
14
zoom view
Fig. 1.9: Bilateral hydronephrosis detected in the second trimester in a patient found to have posterior urethral valves at birth
zoom view
Fig. 1.10: Prune-belly syndrome: Note a large, full and thin-walled bladder
Fetal surgery to treat PUV is controversial given the high complication rate and questionable effectiveness. In one study, prenatal intervention yielded 57% fetal mortality and a 63% incidence of chronic renal impairment in the survivors. This raises the question as to whether fetal intervention only allows the fetus to reach term, but does not reverse renal damage which was already present, at least theoretically, much earlier in gestation.55 To date, percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting has been the approach most frequently attempted. Under ultrasound guidance, a double pigtail catheter is placed with one end in the bladder and the other in the amniotic cavity.
15
zoom view
Fig. 1.11: Prune-belly syndrome, hydronephrosis, large, full, thin-walled bladder
Shunt placement has a 45% complication rate, including problems with the shunts themselves such as migration or obstruction, problems from violation of the maternofetal barrier including premature labor and chorioamnionitis, and from the presence of placenta previa.56 Given the difficulty in placing the shunts, multiple attempts are usually needed and this increases the risk of complications. Overall perinatal mortality after vesicoamniotic shunting approaches 47%,55 and 40% of the survivors have end stage renal disease.56 Intervention that is reserved only for those fetuses with good prognosis (see prenatal evaluation of fetal renal function above) appears to yield the best outcomes.55 New approaches include fetal cystoscopy in an antegrade fashion which allows for accurate diagnosis and disruption of the valves via YAG laser, hydroablation, placement of transurethral stents, or mechanical disruption with guide wires.55,57 These technically difficult procedures are still in the early stages of development.
 
Megaureter
Congenital megaureters are dilated ureters with or without associated pelviectasis or calyectasis and are classified as either primary or secondary. Megaureters may be refluxing or nonrefluxing and obstructive or non-obstructive. Primary megaureters refer to obstructive, non- refluxing megaureters resulting from an abnormal ureterovesical junction, thus the term ureterovesical junction (UVJ) obstruction (see above). Secondary megaureters result from high grade reflux, bladder outlet obstructions (PUV), neuropathic bladder, or systemic disorders such as prune-belly syndrome (Fig. 1.12).
16
zoom view
Fig. 1.12: Prune-belly syndrome, hydronephrosis and markedly dilated, smooth-walled ureter
Normally, ureters are not visualized in utero, thus, visualization of the one or both ureters is abnormal. On sonography, megaureters are characteristically serpeginous, anechoic, tubular structures that fill the fetal abdomen and retrovesical space.58 The ureters can be traced from its origin in the renal pelvis to its insertion in the bladder. In patients with primary megaureters, the volume of amniotic fluid is normal. The bladder is normal in appearance and there is varying degrees of hydronephrosis. The distinction between refluxing and non-refluxing megaureters is impossible by sonography alone, though the presence of an enlarged bladder will suggest the former. Dilated ureters must also be differentiated from bowel obstruction and mesenteric or adnexal masses.
 
Duplex Systems
Duplication of the collecting system is the most common renal abnormality and is seen in up to 4% of the population. In this condition, there are two distinct pelvicalyceal systems within the kidney with complete or partial duplication of the ureter. The condition is unilateral 70% of the time and is more common in females. The overall incidence of prenatally-diagnosed duplex systems ranges from 1 in 70 to 1 in 500.1 Hydronephrosis, renal cysts, polycystic kidneys and ureteropelvic junction obstruction need to be considered in the differential diagnoses.
17
zoom view
Fig. 1.13: Sonographic appearance during a second trimester study of a renal duplication with two distinct renal pelves
In duplex systems, the upper pole moiety is often obstructed due to an ectopic insertion of the ureter into the bladder neck, urethra or vagina, while the lower pole moiety refluxes because of a cephalad and lateral insertion of the ureter into the bladder.40 Several sonographic characteristics are useful in the diagnosis of duplex systems. These include separate and non-communicating renal pelves, hydronephrosis limited to one pole of the kidney, ipsilateral ureteral dilatation, and cystic structures within the bladder consistent with ureteroceles (Fig. 1.13).59 Asymmetric hydronephrosis of the kidney can be easily confused with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.40 Of special note is one report of a duplicated system diagnosed with prenatal MRI because the sonographic images were nondiagnostic.60
 
Renal Agenesis
This condition results from failure in the embryonic development of the metanephros. When bilateral, renal agenesis may be diagnosed as early as 12 weeks gestation 61 from the absence of paravertebral reniform masses in both the transverse and parasagittal planes, associated with anhydramnios (Fig. 1.14). Bilateral renal agenesis occurs infrequently with an incidence of approximately 1 in 4000 births. Although first recognized in 1671 by Wolfstrigel, this condition was extensively described by Potter in the 1940s and 1950s. The anomaly has a male predominance62 and the incidence appears to be influenced neither by maternal age nor by any specific complication of pregnancy or concurrent maternal disease. There is a genetic predisposition to this syndrome with a high level of penetrance, and an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance has been suggested.63
18
zoom view
Fig. 1.14: Bilateral renal agenesis diagnosed in the second trimester. Note a prominent, wedge-shaped adrenal gland located underneath the rib cage and anterior to the spine
The kidneys and renal arteries are usually completely absent, although dysgenetic vestiges may be noted at times.64 The bladder trigone, if present, is poorly- formed as a result of failure of incorporation of mesonephric duct structures into the base of the bladder. The bladder is hypoplastic and may be absent.
Potter extensively described the anomalies associated with bilateral renal agenesis. Amniotic fluid is minimal or absent. The face is prematurely senile, with a flat nose, large flattened and lowered ears, and a depression below the lower lip. A prominent skin fold covers the inner canthus of each eye. In addition, the legs are often bowed and the feet clubbed. This constellation of features, along with pulmonary hypoplasia, is known as Potter’s syndrome. It is thought that the characteristic facial abnormalities and limb features are the result of oligohydramnios and uterine compression, rather than an expression of a systemic anomaly with multiple organ system defects.65 Bilateral renal agenesis is incompatible with life. The characteristic Potter facies and presence of oligohydramnios are pathognomonic. Routine utilization of prenatal ultrasound has allowed diagnosis of this condition in the second and third trimesters with increased accuracy.
The incidence of unilateral renal agenesis (URA) is variable. This condition is more common than bilateral renal agenesis and predominantly affects males (1.8:1).66 Embryologically, unilateral agenesis is most likely caused by complete absence of the ureteral bud 19or aborted ureteral bud development which prevents maturation of the metanephric blastema into the adult kidney. The defect most likely occurs at the 4th or 5th weeks of gestation. Associated genital anomalies are seen more frequently in females and structures derived from the Mullerian or Wolffian ducts are the most affected. Anomalies of other organ systems are frequently observed, including the cardiovascular (30%), gastrointestinal (25%), and musculoskeletal systems (14%).67 Several syndromes are also associated with URA; Turner’s syndrome, Poland’s syndrome, DiGeorge’s anomaly, when associated with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the mother,68 Kallmann’s syndrome, and the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome have been described. Therefore, a comprehensive review of all organ systems should be performed when more than one anomaly is discovered.
 
Pelvic Kidney
The pelvic kidney lies within the confines of the bony pelvis and represents the most prevalent form of renal ectopia. Pelvic kidneys are located opposite the sacrum and below the aortic bifurcation. The presence of pelvic kidneys has been reported in 1/2100 to 3000 autopsies. Ectopic kidneys, on the other hand, are kidneys that never reached their proper position within the renal fossa. Solitary ectopic kidneys are seen in 1/22,000 autopsies.69 The exact mechanism for failure of renal ascent is unknown. Factors that might prevent normal migration of the kidney include maldevelopment of the ureteral bud,70 defective metanephric tissue that fails to induce ascent,71 genetic abnormalities, and maternal illnesses or teratogenic factors.72 Another theory is that a vascular barrier may exist secondary to persistent fetal blood supply.73 During sonographic examination, failure to identify the kidneys in the proper position should prompt a more careful examination of other sites. Although the diagnosis is usually possible with a transabdominal study, on occasion transvaginal sonography is helpful. Color Doppler assessment may identify the blood supply to an ectopic or pelvic kidney.
 
Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney
Multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) represents a severe form of non-genetic dysplasia and is a different entity from polycystic kidney disease. MCDKs are characterized by tense, non-communicating cysts with non-medial location of the largest cyst and absence of functioning renal parenchyma, usually in association with atresia or hypoplasia of the ureter and the renal artery. These kidneys have the appearance of a “bunch of grapes” and lack a reniform configuration. The condition is 20usually unilateral (76%) with the left side being more commonly involved.74 Contralateral renal abnormalities are commonly associated with MCDK, particularly vesicoureteral reflux, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, megaureter and dysplasia. MCDK is second only to hydronephrosis as a cause of abdominal masses in the neonate.75
Antenatal sonography allows the detection of most MCDKs. The appearance is that of a multiloculated abdominal mass with multiple, randomly distributed, thin-walled cysts separated by echogenic parenchyma. The involved kidney is typically larger than expected for gestational age (although in some forms of MCDK the kidneys are small, shrunken and dysplastic) and the amount of amniotic fluid is normal (Figs 1.15 and 1.16).
zoom view
Figs 1.15 and 1.16: Sonographic appearance of multicystic dysplastic kidneys in the second trimester. Note the presence of multiple, independent cysts of various sizes and increased parenchymal echogenicity
21
With bilateral involvement, oligohydramnios or anhydramnios and absence of the urinary bladder are noted. Differential diagnosis includes hydronephrosis and other intra-abdominal cystic masses.
 
Autosomal Recessive (Infantile) Polycystic Kidney Disease (ARPKD)
ARPKD has been referred as the “infantile” form of polycystic kidney disease. This description is somewhat misleading since ARPKD may manifest only at adolescence or in young adulthood, although with significantly less frequency. ARPKD has been reported to affect 1 of every 40,000 live births.76 Antenatally, ARPKD is characterized on sonography by symmetrical, bilateral enlargement of the kidneys with numerous corticomedullary cysts and marked parenchymal echogenicity. This echogenicity can be detected as early as 12 weeks but is more often evident by 22 to 24 weeks of gestation and results from sound waves reflecting off an extensive numbers of dilated tubules (Figs 1.17 and 1.18). Oligohydramnios may not be initially present, but may develop as the pregnancy progresses and carries a poor prognosis. Because of the variability in presentation, prenatal diagnosis is not always possible. When there is a high index of suspicion for this disease, genetic diagnosis is possible as early as 11 to 12 weeks of gestation using chorionic villous sampling since the locus of the mutation is well known.
 
Congenital Mesoblastic Nephroma
Congenital mesoblastic nephroma (CMN) is the most common (50%) renal neoplasm in patients younger than 6 months and constitutes 3 to 6% 77 of the renal tumors found in the first 15 years of life. This benign neoplasm arises from the renal mesenchyme and is usually associated with polyhydramnios, the cause of which is not known. It has been suggested that a mass effect that interferes with swallowing and gastrointestinal uptake of amniotic fluid, or that hypercalcemia resulting from increased prostaglandin production by the tumor results in increased fetal urine output. Prenatal diagnosis of CMN with sonography in the third trimester of pregnancy has been reported in less than 30 cases.22 Classically, CMN appears as a hypoechoic mass with an echogenic rim, the “ring sign”, or as a homogenous or heterogeneous mass without a rim; the latter presentation is impossible to differentiate from congenital Wilms’ tumor. Extrarenal masses arising form the liver or the adrenal gland (neuroblastoma) are included in the differential diagnosis. MRI has shown promise in difficult cases because it allows discrimination of the outline of the tumor from the kidney and adrenal gland.
22
zoom view
zoom view
Figs 1.17 and 1.18: Sonographic appearance of autosomal recessive (infantile) polycystic kidney disease as seen in second trimester sonograms. Note the typical bilateral involvement of the kidneys
 
Bladder Abnormalities
The bladder can be demonstrated in 80% of fetuses by 11 weeks gestation and in up to 90% by 13 weeks. The bladder fills and empties regularly during sonographic examination. Failure to identify the bladder should prompt a detailed fetal scan with particular emphasis on the kidneys. If the kidneys are present, there are no abdominal wall defects, and the bladder is not in an extra-abdominal location (as in bladder and cloacal extrophy), the issue is usually poor fetal growth associated with oligohydramnios. Absence of the bladder is also seen in patients with 23generalized neuropathy with associated contractures and abnormal fetal movements.
Megacystis is diagnosed when the bladder is persistently enlarged while scanning over a period of time, and can already be apparent in the first trimester with a prevalence of 1/400-1/6000. However, up to 60% of babies diagnosed with megacystis in the first trimenter have normal urinary tracts at neonatal evaluation. So, an enlarged and persistently full bladder in the first trimester should be re-evaluated later in pregnancy. Obstructive causes of megacystis include PUV, urethral atresia and extravesical tumors such as sacrococcygeal teratoma. Nonobstructive causes include prune-belly syndrome, high-grade vesicoureteral reflux, and the rare megacystis microcolon hypoperistalsis syndrome. Other causes include cloacal anomalies, neuropathy from spina bifida, intraspinal anomalies, and the caudal regression syndrome.
 
NEONATAL PROGNOSIS OF ANTENATALLY-DETECTED LESIONS
The number of neonates referred for uroradiological evaluation has risen dramatically since the advent of prenatal renal imaging. Most referrals are for prenatally-detected hydronephrosis, but other conditions such as complicated duplications, MCDK, megaureter, renal dysplasia and ectopia are also readily-detected by sonography and require neonatal screening. Another group includes infants with syndromes or multiple anomalies that involve the genitourinary tract such as the VATER or CHARGE associations. Sonographic evaluation is also performed in babies with severe hypospadias and in conditions associated with increased risk of renal malignancy such as the Beckwith- Wiedemann syndrome, aniridia and hemihypertrophy.
Nowadays, most neonates with antenatally-detected urinary abnormalities referred for urological evaluation are asymptomatic and without severely impaired renal function. There is a marked male predominance of 3:1. This is a reflection of the fact that the most common congenital anomalies of the urinary tract such as UPJ obstruction, UVJ obstruction, MCDK, and single-system ureteroceles are much more common in male infants and some conditions such as prune-belly syndrome and posterior urethral valves occur exclusively in males. Only duplex ureteroceles and ectopic ureters (in simple or duplex systems) are more common in females. In contrast to the pre-ultrasound era in which posterior urethral valves was the most common neonatal diagnosis, UPJ obstruction, UVJ obstruction and severe VUR are now being more frequently discovered.
24
 
Antenatal Hydronephrosis
The first step consists of confirming all antenatally-detected abnormalities after birth since this initial sonographic study will direct subsequent radiological evaluation. In studying pelviectasis or hydronephrosis, sonograms performed in the first 24 to 72 hours of life may yield false-negative results due to the relatively low physiologic urine output in the neonate in the first few days of life. The study should either be deferred for 5–7 days, or, if the initial study is normal, it should be repeated at 1 to 2 weeks. Immediate investigation is indicated in anuric or septic infants; again, the results should be confirmed by a repeat study one week later. In general, any infant with pelviectasis should also have a repeat ultrasound at 6 weeks of age. Although pelviectasis may be transient, dilatation of the calyx or its infundibular portion in the neonate is never normal. Physiologic distention of the fetal and neonatal urinary bladder may result in transient dilatation of the ureters or hydronephrosis which resolves after bladder emptying. The absolute significance of mild antenatal pelviectasis (<10 mm AP diameter) and its natural course throughout gestation has yet to be clearly defined. Retrospective studies have shown that approximately 9% of fetal hydronephrosis progresses and only 4% of fetuses with hydronephrosis have functionally-significant urologic lesions. Careful monitoring of patients with bilateral obstruction, low amniotic index, or both is advocated.
The proper management after birth of antenatally-detected pelviectasis has yet to be defined. It appears that, in the absence of infundibular or calyceal dilatation, antenatal pelviectasis is rarely progressive after birth and will resolve within the first year of life in most patients.78 Acute or chronic distention of the bladder will make pelviectasis more prominent. So, care must be taken to evaluate the degree of pelvic dilatation with an empty bladder.
Measurements of the renal pelvic AP diameter after birth are more useful than measurements of the pelvis in the sagittal or coronal planes. However, the Society for Fetal Urology asserts that AP diameter alone is not a sufficient prognostic indicator. The Society recommends that hydronephrosis should be divided into low (0–2) and high grades (3–4); low grades involve only pelvic dilatation whereas high grades are characterized by pelvic and uniform calyceal dilatation. A ten-year review of 464 cases (582 kidneys) with antenatally-diagnosed hydronephrosis showed that 69% of the patients could be managed by observation and radiologic monitoring alone, while the rest required surgical intervention. The latter group of patients had significantly higher grades of hydronephrosis (>3) and an obstructive pattern in diuretic renograms.79
25
 
Vesicoureteral Reflux
Vesicoureteral reflux will be present in 20 to 40% of neonates (with history of antenatal hydronephrosis) who are evaluated after birth. In more than half the reflux is bilateral.37,39 Although ultrasound has come a long way in detecting prenatal abnormalities, it is poor at diagnosing VUR in utero. This is why some have advocated obtaining a postnatal VCUG in all babies with antenatally-detected hydronephrosis, irrespective of the postnatal ultrasound findings.25
Although controversial, it is the authors’ belief that not all cases of antenatally-detected pelviectasis should be investigated with VCUG. Since hydronephrosis in neonates typically involves high -grade reflux, only cases with moderate to severe hydronephrosis should have this invasive study.
Unfortunately, as mentioned above, ultrasound is a poor screening test for VUR and the degree of hydronephrosis does not always correlate with the presence or severity of vesicoureteral reflux, which explains the contradicting recommendations.39 Certainly, male infants with history of significant antenatal unilateral or bilateral hydronephrosis (pelvic AP diameter >10 mm) (Figs 1.19 and 1.20), a persistently full bladder, or thickened bladder walls merit evaluation with VCUG to rule out posterior urethral valves.
The use of prophylactic antibiotics in neonates with hydronephrosis (until the absence of VUR has been demonstrated) is a topic of debate. Nevertheless, most would agree that these are indicated in patients with moderate and severe hydronephrosis.
zoom view
Fig. 1.19: Hydroureteronephrosis detected in the second trimester. In male infants this antenatal finding mandates evaluation with ultrasound and VCUG at birth to rule out posterior urethral valves
26
zoom view
Fig. 1.20: Severe unilateral hydronephrosis detected during routine second trimester ultrasound
Prognosis for children with VUR is good, given that in most cases it can be treated with observation and antibiotics. Even with high grades of VUR, operative correction is successful close to 98% of the time.
Unfortunately, correction of reflux does not always prevent progression of renal damage resulting from congenital renal dysplasia associated with higher grades of reflux, or from previous repeated episodes of pyelonephritis. In spite of this, it is imperative that severe VUR be detected as early as possible, since it remains a significant cause of chronic renal failure and hypertension in children and young adults.
 
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
Prognosis in children with UPJ obstruction is eminently good since severe, bilateral obstruction is rare. Majority of infants with incidentally discovered hydronephrosis are asymptomatic, have no palpable abdominal mass and normal renal function. Spontaneous improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis is frequent. In most fetuses with grade I hydronephrosis (pelvic AP diameter <10 mm.), hydronephrosis resolves before the first postnatal examination and these patients will not need pyeloplasty. The threshold value associated with an increased likelihood of the need for pyeloplasty is a pelvic AP diameter of 9 to 12 mm.26,80 Besides the degree of pelvicalyceal dilatation, other indicators that might prompt surgical intervention include the presence of cortical thinning (which is relatively easy to detect in postnatal sonograms) and increased echogenicity with loss of corticomedullary differentiation 27(which is suggestive of associated parenchymal dysplasia). However, sonographic criteria to discriminate between cortical thinning secondary to compression and the one due to irreversible loss of renal parenchyma are lacking. Worsening hydronephrosis in serial sonographic studies, progressive parenchymal thinning, and an obstructive pattern on diuretic renography with decrease in ipsilateral differential function are accepted criteria for surgical correction of UPJ obstruction. In general, the trend in radiographic and clinical data with serial evaluations is more helpful than relying on isolated imaging studies in making the decision of surgery vs. observation. It is reasonable, at least initially, to repeat sonography and diuretic renograms at 3 month intervals. The majority of children with a minimal or moderate degree of hydronephrosis can be treated conservatively without fear of progressive loss of renal function.81 When surgery is indicated, dismembered pyeloplasty carries high success rates and is well tolerated by most children.
 
Posterior Urethral Valves
Despite advances in neonatal care and prenatal detection, the long-term outcome in children with PUV is not clearly defined. Although some authors report no change in outcome in children with PUV detected on prenatal sonography, other studies have indicated a better prognosis if the anomaly was detected antenatally as compared to detection after birth.82 Four variables appear to be independent predictors of a poor outcome: oligohydramnios, need for ventilatory support, BUN > 40 mg/dl and bilateral vesicoureteral reflux.52 In addition, detection of PUV before 24 weeks of gestation portends a poor prognosis.83 On meta-analysis, unilateral vesicoureteral reflux was found to be prognostic of a better outcome.52 Renal dysfunction is the result of chronic obstruction, dysplasia and reflux nephropathy.54
Management of a neonate with suspected PUV should begin immediately with correction of electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities, antibiotic coverage and drainage of the bladder with a small catheter. The presence of urethral valves is confirmed with a VCUG, which will also provide valuable information on the existence and grade of associated vesicoureteral reflux. If the presence of PUV is confirmed, primary cystoscopic cold knife ablation can be performed in all but very small babies. If valve ablation is not feasible for technical reasons, cutaneous vesicostomy is an alternative mode of bypassing the obstruction. Sonography to assess the degree of hydronephrosis and dysplasia, and diuretic renal scans to evaluate differential function and/or obstruction should be performed after the period of relative 28physiologic oliguria of the neonate resolves (5–7 days). Distinct sonographic corticomedullary differentiation in infants < 6 months of age reliably predicts serum creatinine levels <0.8 mg/dl at follow-up 1–4 years later.84
 
Megaureter
Determination of the etiology of ureteral dilatation (obstructive vs refluxing) is only possible after birth. Initial management should involve placing the newborn on prophylactic antibiotics and performing a postnatal ultrasound and VCUG to determine the presence of reflux or obstruction. When high grade obstruction is suspected, a diuretic renogram is indicated. With primary megaureter, the ureter is often equally or more dilated than the collecting system since the ureter tends to dilate from the bottom up. Primary megaureter tends to be a non-progressive disorder. The prognosis following surgical correction, when indicated, is usually good in these children since procedures to reimplant the ureter are highly successful.
Ureteroceles, defined as cystic dilatation of the distal ureter, are a common cause of ureteral obstruction at the level of the ureterovesical junction. These ureteroceles are more common in females and occur in association with upper pole ureters in duplicated systems that drain ectopically, coursing through the bladder and ending at the bladder neck or urethra with resultant obstruction. Single-system ureteroceles are more common in boys and may be intravesical or ectopic; when ectopic they are usually associated with MCDK or UVJ obstruction. Ureteroceles are readily diagnosed with ultrasound, VCUG, or contrast-enhanced CT scan.
 
Duplex Systems
The clinical significance of the prenatal diagnosis of duplex systems is unknown. At the present time, there are no criteria for predicting who will remain asymptomatic and who will eventually develop complications. Prophylactic antibiotics are generally prescribed until the workup is complete.59,60 A VCUG is imperative to rule out associated vesicoureteral reflux and ureteroceles. Upper pole hydronephrosis, particularly in the absence of reflux, should be investigated with a diuretic renal scan to rule out obstruction.
 
Renal Agenesis
Prognosis of bilateral renal agenesis is understandably poor. Anuria beyond the first 24 hours of life without distention of the bladder should 29suggest renal agenesis. Almost 40% of affected infants are stillborn and most infants who are born alive do not survive beyond the first 24–48 hours because of pulmonary hypoplasia and respiratory failure.85 The diagnosis can be confirmed in the neonate by Doppler ultrasonography, renal scintigraphy, and, if necessary, umbilical artery catheterization with aortography.
There are no obvious clinical signs that suggest unilateral renal agenesis and, therefore, this condition may remain undetected. Prenatal sonography has increased the rate of detection of this condition and has shown an association with other fetal renal pathology including small echogenic kidneys, multicystic dysplastic kidneys, and various obstructive uropathies.86 Approximately one-third of women with unilateral renal agenesis have abnormalities of the internal genitalia.87 These defects are due to partial or complete nonunion of the Mullerian ducts which can result in obstructed hemivagina and bifid uterus, presenting later in life as a pelvic mass and menstrual irregularities or discomfort. The misdiagnosis of ovarian mass is commonly made in otherwise healthy menstruating young women.88 In males, the globus minor, vas deferens, seminal vesicles, ampulla, and ejaculatory ducts, all of which develop from the mesonephric duct, are frequently absent.89 Hypospadias and undescended testes have been reported.90 Cystic dilatations can be present in both males and females. In females these typically represent Gartner’s cysts, whereas in males seminal vesicle cysts, and occasionally prostatic cysts, are more commonly found.
Radiographic evaluation of the upper urinary tract of individuals with abnormalities of the external genitalia or urinary symptoms often leads to the diagnosis of an absent kidney. Investigations used to diagnose solitary kidney may include ultrasonography, excretory urography, radionuclide imaging, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Cystoscopy is no longer indicated to confirm the diagnosis of renal agenesis.
In individuals with URA, the contralateral solitary kidney does not appear to be more susceptible to pathologic complications than normal kidneys and URA is compatible with a normal life span. There is compensatory enlargement of the solitary kidney (hyperplasia) even in utero, providing a clue to the absence of the opposite kidney. Although patients with a solitary kidney are not at increased risk of developing inherent renal problems than individuals with two kidneys, the association of URA with VUR is well documented and voiding cystourethrography is indicated in these patients during neonatal evaluation.37,91
30
 
Pelvic and Ectopic Kidneys
Pelvic kidneys are no more susceptible to disease than normally-positioned kidneys except for the association with ureteral abnormalities, VUR and the propensity to form renal calculi. Causes of hydronephrosis in these kidneys may be malrotation, crossed-fused ectopia, vesicoureteral reflux, or dysmorphism. Thorough assessment of hydronephrosis should be performed before treatment is initiated due to the fact that nonobstructive dilatation may occur in up to 50% of cases.92
Anomalies associated with pelvic kidneys in males include undescended testes, duplication of the urethra, and hypospadias. In females, genital anomalies include bicornuate or unicornuate uterus with atresia of one horn, rudimentary or absent uterus and proximal and/or distal vagina, and duplication of the vagina.93 Complete physical examination and, if needed, examination under anesthesia with cystoscopy and vaginoscopy are in order. Other associated anomalies include those of the skeletal, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems. If necessary, the presence of an ectopic kidney can be confirmed by computed tomography with contrast or dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy.
 
Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney
A clear distinction between MCDK and a hydronephrotic kidney is not always possible prior to birth, though an identifiable renal sinus is usually consistent with hydronephrosis. Renal sonography in an infant with MCDK will show a somewhat random distribution of cysts of various sizes without a larger central or medial cyst and without visible communication between cysts. A DMSA renal scan can also be used to demonstrate non-function of the kidney in cases of MCDK, whereas a hydronephrotic kidney will show some function. As was mentioned earlier, contralateral renal abnormalities are commonly associated with MCDK, particularly vesicoureteral reflux, UPJ obstruction, megaureter and dysplasia. VCUG is therefore mandatory in the evaluation of these infants, and a diuretic renal scan is recommended if there is any degree of contralateral hydronephrosis.94
Complications associated with MCDK include hypertension, malignancy, nodular renal blastema,95 which is a precursor to Wilms’ tumor, and focal nephroblastomatosis.96 Hypertension is an infrequent occurrence in children with MCDK and may not resolve after nephrectomy. Perez and colleagues identified only five reported cases of Wilms’ tumor in the United States developing in MCDKs. 31Furthermore, in a study of 7500 Wilms’ tumor specimens reviewed over 18 years, only five occurred in MCDKs.97 Recent studies have shown that MCDK in children managed nonoperatively has shown complete regression after a few years.98 Currently, the indications for resecting a MCDK include a large kidney that interferes with respiratory or intestinal function in the neonate, or when the cysts contain solid elements that continue to grow on follow-up ultrasounds. Although a lively debate over the management of MCDKs is likely to persist for some time, the saving grace is that most children with MCDK are asymptomatic and healthy.
 
Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease
ARPKD has a spectrum of severity, with the most severe form presenting early in life. There is an invariable association with congenital hepatic fibrosis. The disease may present at birth and prove fatal in the neonatal period. Children in whom ARPKD manifests later in life develop renal failure and hypertension more slowly than those in whom ARPKD is manifest at birth, and may suffer more from liver disease than from the renal manifestations. Hepatic fibrosis leads to portal hypertension, esophageal varices, and hepatosplenomegaly.
A referral for genetic evaluation is recommended when ARPKD is suspected. Because the condition is transmitted as an autosomal recessive trait, neither parent may show evidence of the disease and siblings of either sex have only a 1 in 4 chance of being affected. An area of chromosome 6 has been identified as the genetic locus for the disease.99
An ultrasound showing small renal cysts and a liver biopsy which demonstrates bile duct proliferation and portal fibrosis are usually sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of ARPKD.100 Renal and hepatic transplantation is being increasingly utilized in the management of this other incurable condition.
 
Congenital Mesoblastic Nephroma
Confirmation of the nature of the mass at birth is performed with ultrasound, CT scan or MRI. Classical CMN has excellent prognosis following complete excision. Prognosis of the tumors with the cellular subtype remains controversial. In this group, in patients younger than 3 months, prognosis is excellent after removal, but close follow up is recommended. In patients older than 3 months at the time of diagnosis and in those younger than 3 months with positive surgical margins, chemotherapy may be considered.
32
REFERENCES
  1. Cuckow PM, Thomas DFM. Duplication and other anomalies of the kidney and ureter. In: Thomas DFM (ed) Urologic Diseases in the Fetus and Infant. 1st edn. Butterworth-Heinemann  Oxford:  1997: 223–236.
  1. Cuckow P, Nyirady, P. Embryology of the urogenital tract. In: Gearhart J, Rink, RC, Mouriquand, PDE (eds) Pediatric Urology. WB Saunders  Philadelphia:  2001: 3–13.
  1. Mackie GG, Stephens FD. Duplex kidneys: A correlation of renal dysplasia with position of the ureteral orifice. J Urol 1975; 114: 274–280.
  1. Maizels M. Normal and Anomalous Development of the Urinary Tract. WB Saunders  Philadelphia:  1998.
  1. Muller F. Fetal urine biochemistry: Prognostic factors of renal function pp 27–37. In: Gearhart J, Rink RC, Moriquand PD (eds) Pediatric Urology. WB Saunders  Philadelphia:  2001: 27–37.
  1. Qureshi F JS, Siefman B, Quintero RA et al. In utero urine analysis and renal histology do correlate with the outcome in fetal obstructive uropathies. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996; 11: 306–312.
  1. Glick PL, Harrison MR, Golbus MS, Adzick NS, Filly RA, Callen PW et al. Management of the fetus with congenital hydronephrosis II: Prognostic criteria and selection for treatment. J Pediatr Surg 1985; 20: 376–387.
  1. Grannum PA, Ghidini A, Scioscia A, Copel JA, Romero R, Hobbins JC. Assessment of fetal renal reserve in low level obstructive uropathy. Lancet 1989; 1 (8632): 281–282.
  1. Crombleholme TM, Harrison MR, Golbus MS, Longaker MT, Langer JC, Callen PW et al. Fetal intervention in obstructive uropathy: Prognostic indicators and efficacy of intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1239–1244.
  1. Nicolini U, Fisk NM, Rodeck CH, Beacham J. Fetal urine biochemistry: an index of renal maturation and dysfunction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 46–50.
  1. Berry SM, Lecolier B, Smith RS, Bercau G, Dombrowski MP, Puder KS et al. Predictive value of fetal serum beta 2-microglobulin for neonatal renal function. Lancet 1995; 345 (8960): 1277–1278.
  1. Schardijn GH, Statius van Eps LW. Beta 2-microglobulin: its significance in the evaluation of renal function. Kidney Int 1987; 32: 635–641.
  1. Mussap M, Fanos V, Pizzini C, Marcolongo A, Chiaffoni G, Plebani M. Predictive value of amniotic fluid cystatin C levels for the early identification of fetuses with obstructive uropathies. BJOG 2002; 109: 778–783.
  1. Chitty L, Masturzo, B. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal renal abnormalities. In: Gearhart J, Rink RC, Mouriquand PD (eds) Pediatric Urology. WB Saunders  Philadelphia:  2001: 58–59.
  1. Dugoff L. Ultrasound diagnosis of structural abnormalities in the first trimester. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 316–320.
  1. Zalel Y, Lotan D, Achiron R, Mashiach S, Gamzu R. The early development of the fetal kidney-an in utero sonographic evaluation between 13 and 22 weeks’ gestation. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 962–965.
  1. Chitty LS, Altman DG. Charts of fetal size: kidney and renal pelvis measurements. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 891–897.
  1. Zerin JM. Postnatal sonographic renal screening. In: Gearhart J, Rink RC, Mouriquand PD (eds) Pediatric Urology. WB Saunders  Philadelphia:  2001: 93–94.
  1. 33 Breysem L, Bosmans H, Dymarkowski S, Schoubroeck DV, Witters I, Deprest J et al. The value of fast MR imaging as an adjunct to ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1538–1548.
  1. Kanal E. Pregnancy and the safety of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 1994; 2: 309–317.
  1. de Certaines JD, Cathelineau G. Safety aspects and quality assessment in MRI and MRS: a challenge for health care systems in Europe. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 632–638.
  1. Chen WY, Lin CN, Chao CS, Yan-Sheng Lin M, Mak CW, Chuang SS et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital mesoblastic nephroma in mid-second trimester by sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 927–931.
  1. Benacerraf BR, Mandell J, Estroff JA, Harlow BL, Frigoletto FD, Jr. Fetal pelviectasis: A possible association with Down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 58–60.
  1. Bronshtein M, Yoffe N, Brandes JM, Blumenfeld Z. First and early second-trimester diagnosis of fetal urinary tract anomalies using transvaginal sonography. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10: 653–666.
  1. Moorthy I, Joshi N, Cook JV, Warren M. Antenatal hydronephrosis: negative predictive value of normal postnatal ultrasound—a 5-year study. Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 964–970.
  1. Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, Robitaille P, Homsy Y, Boutin H et al. Urinary tract dilatation in utero: Classification and clinical applications. Radiology 1986; 160: 645–647.
  1. Dudley JA, Haworth JM, McGraw ME, Frank JD, Tizard EJ. Clinical relevance and implications of antenatal hydronephrosis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997; 76: F31–34.
  1. Corteville JE, Gray DL, Crane JP. Congenital hydronephrosis: Correlation of fetal ultrasonographic findings with infant outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 384–388.
  1. Ismaili K, Hall M, Donner C, Thomas D, Vermeylen D, Avni FE. Results of systematic screening for minor degrees of fetal renal pelvis dilatation in an unselected population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 242–246.
  1. Kara SA, Noyan V, Karadeniz Y, Yucel A, Altinok D, Bayram M. Resistance index in fetal interlobar renal artery with renal pelvic dilatation up to 10 mm. J Clin Ultrasound 2003; 31: 75–79.
  1. Wickstrom EA, Thangavelu M, Parilla BV, Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE. A prospective study of the association between isolated fetal pelviectasis and chromosomal abnormality. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 379–382.
  1. Nicolaides KH, Cheng HH, Abbas A, Snijders RJ, Gosden C. Fetal renal defects: associated malformations and chromosomal defects. Fetal Diagn Ther 1992; 7: 1–11.
  1. Oliveira EA, Cabral AC, Pereira AK, Machado IN, Diniz JS, Lana AM et al. Outcome of fetal urinary tract anomalies associated with multiple malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 129–134.
  1. Stoll C, Clementi M. Prenatal diagnosis of dysmorphic syndromes by routine fetal ultrasound examination across Europe. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 543–551.
  1. Atala A. Vesicoureteral reflux. In: Walsh PC (ed). Campbell’s Urology, 8th edn. Saunders  Philadelphia:  2002: 2057.
  1. 34 Kitagawa H, Pringle KC, Stone P, Flower J, Murakami N, Robinson R. Postnatal follow-up of hydronephrosis detected by prenatal ultrasound: The natural history. Fetal Diagn Ther 1998; 13: 19–25.
  1. Zerin JM, Ritchey ML, Chang AC. Incidental vesicoureteral reflux in neonates with antenatally detected hydronephrosis and other renal abnormalities. Radiology 1993; 187: 157–160.
  1. Thomas DF. Fetal uropathy. Br J Urol 1990; 66: 225–231.
  1. Pal CR, Tuson JR, Lindsell DR, McHugh K, Hope PL, Ives K. The role of micturating cystourethrography in antenatally detected mild hydronephrosis. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28: 152–155.
  1. Patten RM, Mack LA, Wang KY, Cyr DR. The fetal genitourinary tract. Radiol Clin North Am 1990; 28: 115–130.
  1. Liang CC, Cheng PJ, Lin CJ, Chen HW, Chao AS, Chang SD. Outcome of prenatally diagnosed fetal hydronephrosis. J Reprod Med 2002; 47: 27–32.
  1. Hanna MK. Antenatal hydronephrosis and ureteropelvic junction obstruction: The case for early intervention. Urology 2000; 55: 612–615.
  1. Hanna MK, Jeffs RD, Sturgess JM, Barkin M. Ureteral structure and ultrastructure. Part II. Congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction and primary obstructive megaureter. J Urol 1976; 116: 725–730.
  1. Rickwood AM, Reiner I, Jones M, Pournaras C. Current management of duplex-system ureteroceles: Experience with 41 patients. Br J Urol 1992; 70: 196–200.
  1. Lebowitz RL, Griscom NT. Neonatal hydronephrosis: 146 cases. Radiol Clin North Am 1977; 15: 49–59.
  1. Brown T, Mandell J, Lebowitz RL. Neonatal hydronephrosis in the era of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 959–963.
  1. Casale AJ. Early ureteral surgery for posterior urethral valves. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17: 361–372.
  1. Atwell JD. Posterior urethral valves in the British Isles: a multicenter B.A.P.S. review. J Pediatr Surg 1983; 18: 70–74.
  1. Parkhouse HF, Barratt TM, Dillon MJ, Duffy PG, Fay J, Ransley PG et al. Long-term outcome of boys with posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol 1988; 62: 59–62.
  1. Pompino HJ, Bodecker RH, Trammer UA. Urethral valves during the first year of life—a retrospective, multicenter study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1995; 5: 3–8.
  1. Nakayama DK, Harrison MR, de Lorimier AA. Prognosis of posterior urethral valves presenting at birth. J Pediatr Surg 1986; 21: 43–45.
  1. Oliveira EA, Rabelo EA, Pereira AK, Diniz JS, Cabral AC, Leite HV et al. Prognostic factors in prenatally-detected posterior urethral valves: A multivariate analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2002; 18: 662–667.
  1. Dinneen MD, Duffy PG. Posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol 1996; 78: 275–281.
  1. Haecker FM, Wehrmann M, Hacker HW, Stuhldreier G, von Schweinitz D. Renal dysplasia in children with posterior urethral valves: A primary or secondary malformation? Pediatr Surg Int 2002; 18: 119–122.
  1. Agarwal SK, Fisk NM. In utero therapy for lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 970–976.
  1. Quintero RA, Shukla AR, Homsy YL, Bukkapatnam R. Successful in utero endoscopic ablation of posterior urethral valves: A new dimension in fetal urology. Urology 2000; 55: 774.
  1. Hofmann R, Becker T, Meyer-Wittkopf M, Tekesin I, Sierra F, Schmidt S. Fetoscopic placement of a transurethral stent for intrauterine obstructive uropathy. J Urol 2004; 171: 384–386.
  1. 35 Montana MA, Cyr DR, Lenke RR, Shuman WP, Mack LA. Sonographic detection of fetal ureteral obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 145: 595–599.
  1. Abuhamad AZ, Horton CE, Jr., Horton SH, Evans AT. Renal duplication anomalies in the fetus: Clues for prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 174–177.
  1. Sozubir S, Lorenzo AJ, Twickler DM, Baker LA, Ewalt DH. Prenatal diagnosis of a prolapsed ureterocele with magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 2003; 62: 144.
  1. Mackenzie FM, Kingston GO, Oppenheimer L. The early prenatal diagnosis of bilateral renal agenesis using transvaginal sonography and color Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13: 49–51.
  1. Parikh CR, McCall D, Engelman C, Schrier RW. Congenital renal agenesis: case-control analysis of birth characteristics. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: 689–694.
  1. Dicker D, Samuel N, Feldberg D, Goldman JA. The antenatal diagnosis of Potter syndrome (Potter sequence). A lethal and not-so-rare malformation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1984; 18: 17–24.
  1. Ashley DJ, Mostofi FK. Renal agenesis and dysgenesis. J Urol 1960; 83: 211–230.
  1. Potter EL. Bilateral renal agenesis. J Pediatr 1946; 29: 68.
  1. Doroshow LW, Abeshouse BS. Congenital unilateral solitary kidney: report of 37 cases and a review of the literature. Urol Surv 1961; 11: 219–229.
  1. Emanuel B, Nachman R, Aronson N, Weiss H. Congenital solitary kidney. A review of 74 cases. Am J Dis Child 1974; 127: 17–19.
  1. Wilson TA, Blethen SL, Vallone A, Alenick DS, Nolan P, Katz A et al. DiGeorge anomaly with renal agenesis in infants of mothers with diabetes. Am J Med Genet 1993; 47: 1078–1082.
  1. Delson B. Ectopic kidney in obstetrics and gynecology. N Y State J Med 1975; 75: 2522–2526.
  1. Cambell MF. Renal ectopy. J Urol 1930; 24: 187.
  1. Ward JN, Nathanson B, Draper JW. The Pelvic Kidney. J Urol 1965; 94: 36–39.
  1. Malek RS, Kelalis PP, Burke EC. Ectopic kidney in children and frequency of association with other malformations. Mayo Clin Proc 1971; 46: 461–467.
  1. Baggentoss AH. Congenital anomalies of the kidney. N Engl J Med 1951; 35: 987.
  1. Filmer RB. Renal dysplasia: Clinicopathological study. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg 1974; 66: 18.
  1. Griscom NT. The Roentgenology of neonatal abdominal masses. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1965; 93: 447–463.
  1. Zerres K, Hansmann M, Mallmann R, Gembruch U. Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. Problems of prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1988; 8: 215–229.
  1. Siemer S, Lehmann J, Reinhard H, Graf N, Loffler G, Hendrik H et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital mesoblastic nephroma associated with renal hypertension in a premature child. Int J Urol 2004; 11: 50–52.
  1. Morin L, Cendron M, Crombleholme TM, Garmel SH, Klauber GT, D’Alton ME. Minimal hydronephrosis in the fetus: Clinical significance and implications for management. J Urol 1996; 155: 2047–2049.
  1. Maizels M, Mitchell B, Kass E, Fernbach SK, Conway JJ. Outcome of nonspecific hydronephrosis in the infant: a report from the Registry of the Society for Fetal Urology. J Urol 1994; 152 (6 Pt 2): 2324–2327.
  1. Zerin J. Postnatal sonographic renal screening. In: Gearhart J, Rink RC, Mouriquand PD (eds) Pediatric Urology. WB Saunders  Philadelphia:  2001: 93–108.
  1. 36 Homsy YL, Saad F, Laberge I, Williot P, Pison C. Transitional hydronephrosis of the newborn and infant. J Urol 1990; 144 (2 Pt 2): 579–584.
  1. Dinneen MD, Dhillon HK, Ward HC, Duffy PG, Ransley PG. Antenatal diagnosis of posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol 1993; 72: 364–369.
  1. Hutton KA, Thomas DF, Arthur RJ, Irving HC, Smith SE. Prenatally detected posterior urethral valves: Is gestational age at detection a predictor of outcome? J Urol 1994; 152 (2 Pt 2):698–701.
  1. Hulbert WC, Rosenberg HK, Cartwright PC, Duckett JW, Snyder HM. The predictive value of ultrasonography in evaluation of infants with posterior urethral valves. J Urol 1992; 148: 122–124.
  1. Davidson WM, Ross GI. Bilateral absence of the kidneys and related congenital anomalies. J Pathol Bacteriol 1954; 68: 459–474.
  1. Mandell J, Paltiel HJ, Peters CA, Benacerraf BR. Prenatal findings associated with a unilateral nonfunctioning or absent kidney. J Urol 1994; 152: 176–178.
  1. Thompson DP, Lynn HB. Genital anomalies associated with solitary kidney. Mayo Clin Proc 1966; 41: 538–548.
  1. Yoder IC, Pfister RC. Unilateral hematocolpos and ipsilateral renal agenesis: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Am J Roentgenol 1976; 127: 303–308.
  1. Ochsner MG, Brannan W, Goodier EH. Absent vas deferens associated with renal agenesis. JAMA 1972; 222: 1055–1056.
  1. Kaneti J, Lissmer L, Smailowitz Z, Sober I. Agenesis of kidney associated with malformations of the seminal vesicle. Various clinical presentations. Int Urol Nephrol 1988; 20: 29–33.
  1. Song JT, Ritchey ML, Zerin JM, Bloom DA. Incidence of vesicoureteral reflux in children with unilateral renal agenesis. J Urol 1995; 153: 1249–1251.
  1. Gleason PE, Kelalis PP, Husmann DA, Kramer SA. Hydronephrosis in renal ectopia: incidence, etiology and significance. J Urol 1994; 151: 1660–1661.
  1. McCrea LE. Congenital solitary pelvic kidney. J Urol 1942; 48: 58.
  1. Kuwertz-Broeking E, Brinkman, H, Von Lengerke, J, Sciuk, J, Fruend, S, Bulla, M, Harms, E, Hertle, L. Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: Experience in children. BJU International 2003; 93: 388–392.
  1. Dimmick JE, Johnson HW, Coleman GU, Carter M. Wilms tumorlet, nodular renal blastema and multicystic renal dysplasia. J Urol 1989; 142 (2 Pt 2):484–485;discussion 489.
  1. Vinocur L, Slovis TL, Perlmutter AD, Watts FB, Jr., Chang CH. Follow-up studies of multicystic dysplastic kidneys. Radiology 1988; 167: 311–315.
  1. Beckwith J. Editorial comment. J Urol 1997; 158: 2259.
  1. Wacksman J, Phipps L. Report of the multicystic kidney registry: Preliminary findings. J Urol 1993; 150: 1870–1872.
  1. Zerres K, Mucher G, Bachner L, Deschennes G, Eggermann T, Kaariainen H et al. Mapping of the gene for autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) to chromosome 6p21-cen. Nat Genet 1994; 7: 429–432.
  1. Shaikewitz ST, Chapman A. Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: Issues regarding the variability of clinical presentation. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993; 3: 1858–1862.