Preventive Genetics Sharad Gogate
INDEX
×
Chapter Notes

Save Clear


1Introduction Public Health Aspects2

Preventive Genetics—Holistic Healthcare1

Sharad Gogate
 
INTRODUCTION
All over the world, particularly in developed and developing countries standard of living and healthcare are improving. As a result nutritional deficiencies, infections and other preventable causes of morbidity and mortality have been controlled to great extent. Hence nonpreventable causes like genetic disorders, congenital anomalies have assumed importance as significant cause of morbidity and mortality at all stages of life. With completion of the Human Genome Project our understanding of human genome and it’s role in human body has undergone sea change.
The ancient Indian medical system of Ayruveda is the epitome of preventive aspect of healthcare. The definition of health according to this system is given by the following verse from Sushruta (ancient Indian sage).
zoom view
It means when all three Doshas (proximate principles), Agni (metabolic driving forces), all seven Dhatu (body tissues) and Malakriya (body waste disposal systems) are evenly balanced and when Atma (soul), Indriyas (body organs) and the Manas (mind) are happy and contended then one is said to be healthy. This is the most positive and encompassing definition.
It is true that our Genetic blue print is beyond our control and comprehensively regulates the development, functioning of human body in health and disease at all stages of life. Contrary to belief, our Genetic Destiny is not totally preordained!
By implementing multispecialty, holistic, preventive approach at all stages of life we can make a lot of difference in incidence of genetic disorders, their severity, the chances of survival, quality of life of our patients and their families. Community health planners are becoming well aware about these facts and a new specialty of Preventive Genetics is emerging rapidly to tackle these problems.
Importance of genetic disorders in clinical practice is seen in Table 1.1.
4
Table 1.1   Importance of genetic disorders in clinical practice
  • Increased importance of genetic factors in clinical medicine is very apparent, almost 20-30 percent disorders seen in day to day practice have some genetic components as a causative/aggravating pathology.
  • Definite risk of recurrence in relatives.
  • Varied and confusing presentation and inheritance patterns of genetic disorders makes the diagnosis and management more challenging.
  • It is more advantageous to prevent occurrence of a genetic disorder, diagnose and treat it at preclinical stage than to wait for the birth of a baby with serious genetic disorder.
 
THE BURDEN OF GENETIC DISORDERS AND CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS
Various measures reflect the population burden of genetic disorders and congenital anomalies. These include the incidence or prevalence of these disorders, associated morbidity and mortality, life expectancy and the economic burden on the family and society. Oocytes and sperms show aneuploidies in 18-19 percent and 3-5 percent respectively, as a result 1 in 13 conceptions show chromosomal anomalies. Fifty percent of first trimester abortions are due to chromosomal disorders. Still births and neonatal deaths show chromosomal defects in 5.6-11.5 percent cases.1
The exact incidence of various categories of genetic disorders is not known, Table 1.2 shows the incidence of these disorders from a very large study by Baird et al, 1988.2
Table 1.2   The frequency of genetic disorders in 1,169,873 births
Category
Rate per million live births
% of total births
Autosomal-recessive
1395.4
0.14
Autosomal-dominant
1665.3
0.17
X-linked
532.4
0.05
Chromosomal
1845.4
0.18
Multifactorial
46582.6
4.64
Genetic unknown
1164.2
0.12
Total
53175.3
5.32
All congenital anomalies
52808.2
5.28
(Source: Baird et al, 1988)
The incidence of genetic disorders in India was found to be 2.3 percent in a study by IC Verma.3
5
 
PREVENTIVE GENETICS AT MACRO-LEVEL
As a result of this big impact of genetic disorders on community, attention of public health workers has been focused on this problem. As the genetic disorders affect all strata of society irrespective of the social or economic status, it is essential for healthcare policy planners to have a macro-level plan for devising and implementation of Preventive Genetic program. Only then the full benefit of this program will reach all strata of society in all geographic locations.
Important components of such a program should include:
 
Baseline Epidemiological Studies in the Target Population
Incidence of various congenital and genetic disorders varies in different communities, castes and it is essential to study the epidemiology of these disorders in a particular region/community so as to decide the priorities in the program. This will help in identifying specific details of particular disorder like incidence, mutation details, inheritance patterns and clinical presentation and help in finding out information about any high risk sub-population. It is essential to know the natural history of the disorder, impact on morbidity and mortality, epidemiological and cultural effects. Only after this is achieved then appropriate program for efficient screening, diagnosis and management of the target disorders can be finalized.
 
Increase Awareness About Genetic Disorders
Unfortunately there is very little awareness about the importance of genetic, congenital disorders in healthcare at all levels. There are lots of myths, misconceptions about this in general population in most of the developing countries. High level of awareness in the entire target population about the genetic program and the target disorder is essential for it’s success. We require sensitization of the policy makers, administrators as only then preventive genetics will receive the required importance, funds and support. Awareness in the medical, paramedical and other health workers is also far from adequate. This requires due changes in the medical education as well, so as to cover the latest advances in the field of clinical genetics and fetal medicine. Active, co-ordinated participation of government agencies, private practitioners, professional bodies, NGOs, religious and social groups and student bodies will ensure that the program percolates to all regions and communities adequately. It is necessary to inculcate better health seeking behavior in the general population about genetic disorders. 6Campaign for increased awareness in the populace about the target disorder and the program should also receive top priority.
 
Establish/Strengthen Efficient Two-way Referral System
It is essential to cover the entire population and integrate preventive genetics in healthcare system in the national healthcare programs like Maternal and Child Health. The existing healthcare delivery systems in public as well as private sectors should be fully utilized so as to reach the entire population of the country. This will ensure coverage of the entire target population, better utilization of healthcare facilities at all levels and to provide efficient, patient-friendly, easily available quality healthcare at all levels.
 
Organize Genetic Centers of Excellence
As Preventive Genetic program requires specialized facilities for counseling, sophisticated laboratories and multispecialty teams for clinical management of these complex disorders, it is essential to develop such well-conducted centers of excellence at district levels at least. Such centers should be housed in hospitals affiliated to medical colleges, district level multispecialty hospitals as well as private sector multispecialty hospitals to make utilization of academic facilities and trained medical and paramedical personnel. Proper conceptualization, organization of such centers and multispeciality approach are essential. Components of such a center should include: (1) clinical facilities (indoor and outdoor) for management of high risk cases, (2) counseling, social support, (3) laboratory facilities, viz. cytogenetics, molecular genetics, metabolic studies, assisted reproduction and onco-genetics. Phased manner of development is needed depending upon availability of resources, needs and priorities of the society so as to optimize the utilization of resources. These centers should be used as nodal facilities for starting academic programs to start courses pertaining to the field so as to train personnel to run such facilities, carry out epidemiological studies and research. Proper data collection and compilation along with periodic reviews of the center’s activities with work audits should be done.
 
Devise and Conduct Appropriate Genetic Screening Programs
Genetic screening tests are very useful as we can cover very large population quickly and cost-effectively so as to identify high risk sub-population from the low risk general population. They help reducing need of costly, potentially harmful diagnostic tests; ensure better utilization of costly, labor intensive techniques, save costs while helping the down-staging of the target disease. At the same time there are certain disadvantages like additional costs and efforts to the patients, problem of false positivity, low sensitivity and specificity and ethical, social issues.
7
Table 1.3   Requirement of a good genetic screening program
  • The target disorder should be well-defined, have significant incidence and severity to affect the population.
  • Screening test should be simple, safe (preferably non-invasive), affordable, easily available and with acceptable false positivity and sensitivity.
  • Availability of accurate diagnostic test to confirm the diagnosis in screen positive individuals.
  • Follow-up management options should be there for the high risk population identified by the screening test.
Requirements of a good screening program are shown in Table 1.3.
Developing countries like India face some major problems in setting-up of genetic screening programs like very large population, lack of awareness, late antenatal registration. Genetic screening is not mandatory even in high risk pregnancies. Cost factor is very important as 40 percent deliveries are conducted in public sector, where totally free services are provided. The meager funds are not adequate to cover even higher priorities like malnutrition, prematurity, infectious diseases hence priority for such screening programs is quite low. On the other hand 60 percent deliveries are conducted by private sector, which is self-funded by the patients as insurance coverage is still very low, due to lack of awareness and high costs the acceptance of screening tests is still quite low. All the same screening programs like NTD, Down’s syndrome, thalassemia/sickle cell disorders have become quite popular in urban and semi-urban areas. Though neonatal metabolic screening program has not yet been that well- accepted. The author’s center was one of the first clinic to set-up second trimester screening for Down’s syndrome in Mumbai city almost a decade back. Limitations of genetic screening programs are low positive predictive value, false positivity, confusing risk assessment, need for confirmatory tests and ethical issues which make the implementation of these screening programs quite challenging.
 
Networking of All Tertiary Level Institutions
It is highly essential to have close networking of all regional, national and global institutions/laboratories involved in preventive genetics program as knowledge and technology in field of clinical genetics is very rapidly expanding. Establishing of such centers of excellence requires very high financial investments, costly equipment and highly skilled personnel. As 8there are literally thousands of tests needed to diagnose the large number of genetic disorders all the centers can not perform all the tests as duplication is quite wasteful and unnecessary. Hence it is vital to have close networking of all centers at regional and national level so as to allow free sharing of specialized facilities, training programs, clinical material, information and research data. This will result in proper utilization of scarce resources and provide better coverage of entire population.
 
PREVENTIVE GENETICS AT MICRO-LEVEL (INDIVIDUAL PATIENT’S LEVEL)
To be really effective in this aspect we have to improve the health seeking behavior of entire family, so as to report to the clinician for timely counseling and investigations for possible genetic disorder. It is also necessary for every family to record details of ethnic background, medical, genetic disorders and any unexplained death or deformity and report the same to the clinicians. It is also necessary for the clinicians to have high index of suspicion so as to pick-up more subtle symptoms and signs suggestive of possible genetic causes. Preventive genetic evaluation should begin right from birth till the old age!
 
Neonatal Period
Along with usual neonatal evaluation for wellbeing of the newborn, we must look for subtle signs, symptoms of chromosomal, monogenic disorders and metabolic disorders. This should follow necessary investigations and management. It is also essential to screen all newborns for Inborn Errors of Metabolism by day three/four of life. It is possible to screen for a large number of such disorders fairly, quickly and accurately, which will help in the identification of children at risk so that medical interventions like pharmacotherapy, specific diets, etc. can be instituted so as to avoid deleterious effects on the physical and mental development of the child and preserve quality of life whenever possible. As incidence of many of these disorders is quite low and varies in different ethnic, geographical sub-groups, it is necessary to identify the target disorders by epidemiological studies before finalising such screening programs.
 
Adolescent Period
This period is vital as it involves individuals who are more receptive to new ideas and suggestions, who will be the future parents. Inclusion of genetic evaluation and screening along with sex education, nutritional 9advice and contraception will be helpful in imparting awareness about genetic factors in healthcare, which will help them in seeking timely advice from their clinicians at the appropriate time.
 
Premarital Stage
Detailed history, thorough examination, follow-up testing done at this stage will certainly go a long way in preventing quite a few genetic disorders. Important areas to be covered are shown in Table 1.4.
Table 1.4   Areas to be covered at premarital stage
  • Family/ethnic history of genetic disorder
  • Chromosomal anomalies in either partners
  • Blood group incompatibility like Rh, hemoglobinopathy
  • Familial cancers, coronary heart disease
  • Reproductive tract anomalies in either partners
  • Occupational hazards
History of genetic disorders like thalassemia, hemophilia, muscular dystrophy, etc. will immediately prompt the clinician to advice appropriate screening tests to both partners so as to advice them about risk of recurrence, specific tests for prenatal diagnosis and management.
Although most of the conceptions with chromosomal defects are lost during antenatal stage, 0.6-0.8 percent of live born show chromosomal defects. Of these 0.4 percent is severe defects diagnosable at birth while 0.3 percent can be more subtle and have effect on child bearing. It is essential to have appropriate cytogenetic tests to be done in such individuals and counsel them accordingly.4
Blood group testing is now universally done in antenatal period but it should be done routinely at premarital stage itself. As it will give timely information in discordant couples so that necessary preventive measures can be taken up.
Certain cancers are caused by specific defective genes like BRCA-1 gene which is responsible for breast cancers. Cancers of breast, ovaries, colon and prostate are known to occur in families with presence of such abnormal genes. Some of the genetic disorders are more prone to cancers like leukemia in Down’s syndrome babies, Fanconi anemia while gonadal malignancies are more likely in undescended testes and residual gonads in Turner’s syndrome.
10
 
Prior to Conception
This is the most vital stage at which proper evaluation and guidance can go a long way in preventing genetic disorders. Unfortunately majority of conceptions are unplanned and thus a valuable opportunity of pre-conception evaluation is lost in such couples. Full documentation of medical, obstetric and genetic history, construction of family pedigree and complete medical check-up of both partners is essential. All tests for confirmation of underlying genetic/medical factors should be done at this stage only.
Consanguinity should be investigated and proper counseling offered about the increased risk of genetic diseases. The problem of consanguinity is quite common particularly in Muslims and certain ethnic communities in southern states in India.
Certain genetic disorders and concurrent pregnancy can have mutually deleterious effects. Increased risk of thrombophlebitis, embolic episodes is seen during pregnancy and childbirth in homocystinuria.5 Ehler-Danlos syndrome and Marfan’s syndrome have higher risk of aortic/vascular rupture and uterine rupture during pregnancy and childbirth.6 Sickle cell, epilepsy, SLE and myotonic muscular dystrophy and untreated maternal phenylketonuria increase risk of pregnancy losses, birth defects considerably. Hence proper control of these prior to conception and close monitoring of maternal and fetal health all through the pregnancy is essential.
Many of the maternal medical disorders like diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorders, epileptic convulsions, psychotic disorders and autoimmune disorders pose a risk of genetic/birth defects, hence proper control of these with use of safer therapeutic options should be achieved prior to planning a pregnancy. It has been shown that strict metabolic control of diabetes prior to conception reduced the risk of congenital malformations in the fetus was 0.8 percent as compared to 7.55 when the metabolic control achieved after completion of 8th week.7
Environmental factors like illicit drugs, smoking, alcohol, exposure to excessive heat and occupational exposure to potential teratogens should be curtailed where ever possible.
Prophylactic immunization against rubella, hepatitis-B, E and screening for potentially teratogenic maternal infections like TORCH group, HIV-AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections is equally important prior to conception.
Pre and periconception supplementation of folic acid, zinc will go a long way in NTD, facial clefting and certain inborn errors of metabolism prophylaxis as well as to reduce risk of pregnancy losses from miscarriages. 11For maximum benefit the supplementation should be started a menstrual cycle before couple stops contraception and continues till 16-18 weeks of conception. Low dose aspirin prophylaxis is of some benefit in autoimmune disorders like SLE, APL syndrome, unexplained IUGR/still births and higher risk for PIH. Low dose glucocorticoids have been also used for indications like SLE, APL syndrome, unexplained pregnancy wastages with variable results.
 
POSTCONCEPTION STAGE
Preimplantation stage evaluation and diagnosis has assumed tremendous importance as more women are subjected to assisted reproductive technologies like IVF, ICSI, ZIFT, etc. and can be benefited by PGD as it improves the success rate of these techniques and ensures birth of a healthy child.
Postconception stage is the time when majority of women present themselves to the obstetrician. Early enrollment, preferably as soon as pregnancy is diagnosed, is essential as it gives the clinician adequate time to do various screening tests and offer appropriate diagnostics tests and management options.
 
First-Three Months
Every woman should try and report to the gynecologist as soon as she misses the menses, confirm pregnancy by urinary/blood beta HCG test. Periconceptional folic acid, multivitamin supplementation, if not already started, should be given to each pregnant woman. Avoiding very hot baths (hot tub bath/saunas increase the risk of NTDs by several folds).8 Light diet, small frequent feeds, avoid very spicy, unhygienic food is also helpful in ensuring proper health at this stage. As most of the medications, except calcium and multivitamins preparations have potential risk of teratogenesis one should avoid any unnecessary/self medication, consult your doctor for any medical problem. As women are more likely to be exposed exanthematous infections from the other children in their families they should avoid contact with persons suffering from exanthematous fevers (measles, mumps, etc.). If such exposure is inevitable it should be reported to the medical personnel immediately. It is also important to avoid exposure to toxic chemicals, and exposure to X-rays, stop alcohol, smoking, etc. as soon as pregnancy is diagnosed.
12
 
Screening for Chromosomal and Structural Anomalies
Neural Tube Defects are one of the most common birth defects affecting the human fetus with significant morbidity and mortality and Trisomy 21 is the most common aneuploidy with significant impact on the fetal and neonatal wellbeing in form of moderate to severe mental retardation and several genetic deformities. Hence these are the two disorders targeted for developing screening and diagnostic programs in pregnant women.
The emphasis in antenatal screening has been to develop earlier, more reliable, cost effective and safer screening tests so as to cover maximum low risk population to identify the high risk sub-group. As a result diagnostic testing like fetal tissue sampling and confirmatory tests (which are potentially harmful, labor intensive and expensive) can be offered to a smaller sub-population with maximum pick-up of affected fetuses.
 
First Trimester Screening and Diagnostic Procedures
  • 10-14 week ultrasonography
  • Combined screening with maternal serum and sonographic markers
  • Chorion villous sampling for genetic testing.
With improvement in the resolution of USG equipment and intensive training of operators, 10-14 week scan by abdominal and vaginal route has become the first anomaly scan. Apart from confirming the viability of the pregnancy, almost 70-80 percent of major structural anomalies can be picked up at this scan. This gives enough time to the clinician to perform any confirmatory tests, offer counseling and start antenatal therapy (where ever feasible) at an early stage. In cases with lethal anomalies an easier and more private option of first trimester can be offered.
Use of serum markers for screening for NTD and Down’s syndrome started with the advent of Triple Test in early 1980s. Age as screening parameter is not enough as it can pick-up only one-third of Down’s babies. To bring forward the screening in the first trimester attempts were started and two molecules, viz. free beta hCG and PAPP-A were used by Nicolaides and his group in 1995. Together they had detection rate of ~60 percent at 5 percent false positive. With combination of maternal age, nuchal translucency and these two serum markers the detection rate jumped to almost 90 percent.9 To achieve this spectacular success nuchal translucency measurement has to be accurately done on a high resolution scanner by a trained operator and software for risk assessment has to be used as well. With additional USG markers of nasal bone and Doppler flow studies of ductus venosus the detection rate can be further improved. The author 13set-up combined first trimester screening program in Mumbai city in 2002 analysis of first 300 tests showed a detection rate of 85 percent at 5 percent false positivity. Out of these 22 cases were screen positive. After post-test counseling 18 underwent fetal tissue sampling and karyotyping, 10 had normal karyotype, while 8 showed aneuploidy.10 To improve the detection rate sequential screening of 11-14 weeks combined testing followed by a Quadruple Test at 16 to 18 weeks has been tried with some improvements (DR 92%).
Chorion villous sampling for confirmation in screen positive cases has emerged as the logical choice. The chorionic tissue is suitable for cytogenetic tests, DNA testing as well as metabolic studies. Though amniocentesis is the most commonly performed prenatal diagnostic procedure CVS has the advantage of early and rapid diagnosis in first trimester thus reducing anxiety, keeping the pregnancy private and also to offer the safer first trimester termination option. To achieve the high safety and success of CVS it is essential to have properly trained operator with experience of at least 300-400 tests and should be well versed in embryology and first trimester USG. Good resolution ultrasound machines also makes the procedure quick and safe. Major clinical experiences in first trimester CVS is shown in Table 1.5.
Table 1.5   Clinical experience of CVS
Author
Technique
No of cases
Gest weeks
Success %
Preg loss %
1. Brambati et al11
TC
1305
8-12
99.2
3.9
2. Brun et al12
TA
10741
8-38
99.9
1.7
3. Jackson and Wapner13
TA
11600
9-12
99.7
1.9
4. Williams et al14
TC
2949
9-12
99.7
1.9
5. Brambati et al15
TC/TA
10000
8-32
99.7
2.6
6. Gogate et al16
TC/TA
10050
9-28
98.8
2.1
Doubt about the safety of CVS was raised after the cluster of severe Limb Reduction Defect anomalies (LRD) reported by Firth et al in 1991. WHO statement based on the complete follow-up of 76476 cases by the WHO-CVS registry did not show any increased risk of LRD following CVS performed by well experienced operators and performed only after eighth completed week of pregnancy. The risk of bleeding, feto-maternal hemorrhage, infection and pregnancy loss is more than amniocentesis but due to it’s advantage of early diagnosis the test is becoming more popular.17
14
 
Fourth-Six Months
This is a very vital period when the organogenesis is complete and growth phase has started. Comprehensive antenatal care with adequate and balanced diet, regular antenatal exercises and multivitamin, iron and calcium supplementation should be provided to ensure proper fetal development. Those women who enroll late should be evaluated and counseled for risk of any genetic/birth defects.
Basic requirements of a worthwhile screening program are shown in Table 1.6.
Table 1.6   Basic requirements of good screening program
Disorder
Well defined
Prevalence
Known and significant
Natural history
Medically important disorder, no effective cure available
Financial
Cost effective
Facilities
Available or easily installable
Ethical
Procedures after screen positive result are agreed, acceptable to patients and service provider
Test performance
Test should be simple and safe, distribution of test values in affected and normal individuals should be known and with sufficiently small overlap and a suitable cut-off
Access
The test should be available to the entire population
There is no screening program that meets these criteria fully, but NTD screening by combined maternal screening and Ultrasonography comes fairly close. Maternal serum screening for Down’s and NTD was introduced in seventies. Initially double, then triple and quadruple tests were offered to patients. After introduction of first trimester maternal serum screening with/without NT measurements first and second trimester combined screening was offered to improve the detection rate and reduce the need for the interventional tests. The efficacy of various screening tests is shown in following graph (Fig. 1.1).
Although maternal serum screening for NTD and Down’s syndrome should be offered to all women at 16-18 weeks, we in developing country like India face some vexing problem in prenatal screening for NTD and Down’s syndrome. Significant percentage of women deliver at home and do not receive comprehensive antenatal care, the time of enrollment is also late (mostly by 5-7th month) thus missing the chance for such screening. In Mumbai city 40 percent deliveries take place in public sector hospitals at almost free of charge, due to resource limitations such screening can not be provided. Remaining 60 percent deliveries take place in private nursing homes and hospitals most of these are paid for by patients 15themselves, which adds to the cost.
zoom view
Fig. 1.1: Relative efficacy of various maternal serum screening tests for Down’s syndrome
Low demand for these tests keeps the cost per test high which has a negative effect on the acceptance of the tests and coverage of entire population. The incidence of NTD in India varies from 1.7-12.2/1000 live births (BDR news bulletin vol. 5 issue 2: April 2005). There is no national data on incidence of Down’s syndrome but it varies from 1:800-1000 live births.18 With the annual deliveries of over 25 million the load of these anomalies is really quite huge. In spite of these difficulties attempts have been made to offer this screening program to antenatal patients and over last 5-7 years the acceptance has improved and more and more obstetricians are including second trimester (for last couple of years even the first trimester test) in their antenatal program. The performance of our center in Mumbai for second trimester test is shown in Table 1.7.
Table 1.7   Second trimester screening for Down’s syndrome and NTD
99-00
01-02
02-03
03-04
Total
Screen +ve
46 (5.1%)
50 (5.7%)
71 (4.7%)
134 (5.6%)
301
Screen −ve
826
936
1500
2240
3502
NTD +ve
17 (1.8%)
24 (2.3%)
36 (2.2%)
59 (2.45%)
136
Trisomy 18
11
7
6
15
39
Unevaluable
14
9
12
17
52
Total
897
1010
2391
2391
5897
Source: Gogate SG et al19
16Anomaly scan at 18-20 weeks is vital as it should be able to pick-up most of the structural anomalies, except some of the anomalies like renal, musculoskeletal and growth-related defects which appear later. Study of various ultrasonography markers associated with chromosomal anomalies like nuchal thickness, duodenal atresia, choroid plexus cysts, etc. is equally vital to pick-up the high risk cases and offer prenatal diagnostic testing to them. In view of this some workers are shifting the anomaly scan to 22 weeks.
 
Fetal Tissue Sampling in Second Trimester
In spite of the screening tests, ultrasonography and other noninvasive tests certain high risk patients have to undergo fetal tissue sampling for confirmation and prognostication of the fetal disorders like chromosomal anomalies, single gene disorders, IEM, fetal infections, etc. To carry out these interventional tests reliably and safely we have to have genetic centers of excellence with well-trained clinical and laboratory facilities, multi-specialty fetal medicine program.
Amniocentesis is the most prevalent test and is considered as a gold standard. Genetic amniocentesis is conventionally done between 15-24 weeks of pregnancy. The amniotic fluid is tested for chromosomal evaluation by study of cultured/uncultured amniocytes (conventional karyotyping, FISH/QF-PCR), study of single gene disorders by DNA diagnostic tests and evaluating errors of metabolism by study of supernatant fluid or amniocytes. Fetal involvement in maternal infections can be verified by DNA testing, immunological work-up. The clinical safety and success of amniocentesis depends upon: (1) experience of the operator performing the procedure, (2) characteristics of the amniotic fluid (blood staining/discolored fluid) (3) direct ultrasonography supervision and (4) indication for the procedure.20 The clinical efficacy of this test performed in over 500 cases last year by our center was success rate of 99.6 percent and pregnancy loss rate of 0.4 percent. The efficacy of the laboratory testing was over 99 percent with failure to grow AF culture in less than 1 percent.21
Fetal blood sampling for prenatal diagnosis is most likely to be done for rapid fetal karyotyping, evaluation of fetal hematological disorders and fetal infections, DNA diagnosis. Therapeutic procedures like intrauterine transfusions, drug therapy and stem cell transfer are also performed through cordocentesis. Direct ultrasound-guided cord blood sampling is the most commonly preferred technique. Safety of the procedure is acceptable with uncorrected pregnancy loss rate of 1.6 percent in a large collaborative data 17from 14 North American centers.22 In a similar multicentric study by the author, 1216 cordocentesis were evaluated from seven centers in India with success rate of 93.2 percent and uncorrected pregnancy loss of 2.3 percent.16
The extension of transabdominal CVS in second and third trimester is a very convenient, safe alternative to amniocentesis and fetal blood sampling particularly as an alternative to early amniocentesis, when patient presents late or an anomaly diagnosed beyond 26 weeks or when amniocentesis or cordocentesis is confounded by unfavorable conditions like severe oligohydramnios.23,24 We have also been using late CVS in second and third trimesters as an alternative to fetal blood sampling and amniocentesis with gratifying results.
 
Antenatal Learning
This is a new concept which has been pursued by many workers. The human fetus is aware about it’s surrounding milieu and can interact with it, this can be appreciated after 16 weeks of pregnancy. Based on the ancient Hindu concept of prenatal education, an on-going study has been going on in an educational community near Mumbai, India for last three decades. In this study positive inputs like better dialogue with mother (of course the father as well) and the fetus, welcome the baby with good thoughts, use of Vedic chants and music were given to the pregnant woman. Efforts were made to improve the physical and emotional status of the mother during pregnancy and delivery. The impact of these on the fetus was studied by stroboscope tests, fetal Doppler and ultrasound. This study showed there was statistically significant difference in the study group in the form of better emotional bonding, alertness, receptivity and more stable temperament.25 Attempts are on to test this concept on fetuses diagnosed to have physical/mental disorders and evaluate the impact on fetal development in these affected babies. (Refer to chapter 24 on Antenatal Learning.)
 
Seventh-Nine Months
Problems encountered during last three months of pregnancy are:
  1. Certain congenital defects which can manifest/ are diagnosed in third trimester or follow-up of anomalies detected earlier and pregnancy continued.
  2. Intrauterine growth restriction due to various genetic and environmental causes.
  3. 18Premature rupture of membranes and preterm labor with risk of lethal pulmonary hypoplasia.
 
Diagnosis, Management of Fetal Anomalies
Anomaly scan done in first and second trimester can detect most of the anomalies, but some times patients present late or certain anomalies like obstructive uropathies like PUJ obstruction/posterior urethral valve, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, nonimmune hydrops due to cardiac anomalies or rhythm disturbances, certain CNS anomalies like late onset hydrocephalus or agenesis of corpus callosum and amniotic fluid volume problems appear quite late. Hence indication based ultrasound examination is needed with joint consultation with pediatric surgeons, cardiologist and neonatologist so as to arrive at correct diagnosis and prognostication. In many of these problems it is worth while doing invasive testing in third trimester by amniocentesis or fetal blood sampling so as to look for associated chromosomal/single gene disorders. This will help in proper counseling.
The whole exercise is worth as it gives the woman range of options like intrauterine therapy, postnatal therapy, medical termination (when ever feasible and possible) and plan the place, time and mode of delivery so as to give best chance to the high risk fetus. We have been conducting a Multispecialty Fetal Medicine Consultancy Services in Mumbai for last three years. We have managed over 350 high risk pregnancies with good results.26
 
Intrauterine Growth Restriction
This is an important problem as it is associated with increased pregnancy wastage, increased risk of acute and chronic fetal distress, impaired neurologic development and long term complications like obesity, type-2 diabetes, coronary artery disease and certain genetically determined malignancies. By definition IUGR is sub-optimal hyperplasia and hypertrophy in second and third trimesters of pregnancy with deficient fetal growth, weight gain, size and maturation of the fetus.27 The etiology of IUGR is very varied and includes genetic factors like placental confined mosaicism involving chromosomes 4 and 7, uniparental disomy involving chromosome 16. Many of the structural anomalies like cardiac defects, musculoskeletal anomalies and aneuploidies like Down’s syndrome are also associated with moderate to severe IUGR.28 Chronic/acute malnutrition in pregnant mother is also an important cause particularly in developing 19country like India with more than 50 percent population below poverty line, lack of comprehensive antenatal care and unsupervised home delivaries in significant sections of pregnant women in rural areas. The incidence of IUGR/LBW babies in India ranges from 22-40 percent with resultant impact on child survival, development and long term complications like hypertension, diabetes and coronary heart diseases. Prevention of such nutritionally caused IUGR is a major concern in public health workers and obstetricians from India.
Diagnosis of IUGR depends upon:
  • Detailed history elicitation and examination for any of the underlying causes as well as appropriate investigations,
  • Accurate dating of the pregnancy by history and early scan in first trimester,
  • Regular antenatal check-up with meticulous record of maternal weight gain, fundal hight,
  • Ultrasonography parameters like upper abdominal circumference, cerebellar diameter, Amniotic Fluid Index (AFI) and Doppler studies.
Management of IUGR is far from satisfactory, particularly when ever it is idiopathic. In spite of many claims there is no effective treatment for such cases. Early diagnosis and amelioration of causative pathology, improving maternal nutrition (especially preconceptional stage onwards), and close monitoring of high risk cases by a team approach so as to decide the optimum time, place and mode of delivery yield best results. These fetuses require close neonatal and long term follow-up so as to manage various problems in a preventive manner.
 
Premature Rupture of Membranes/Preterm Labor
Causes of these problems are quite varied and not well-understood. Infections like STIs, chorioamnionitis play important role. Certain genetic/structural birth anomalies are more prone to preterm labor and rupture of membranes. The high perinatal mortality is mainly due to pulmonary hypoplasia with resulting respiratory distress though infections, other organ immaturity with metabolic disturbances also play important role. The treatment depends on the timely diagnosis and management of underlying causative factors. Prenatal prediction of pulmonary hypoplasia is highly desirable as it can influence the antenatal, postnatal management and give valuable help in deciding place and mode of delivery. The best prediction is achieved by combination of clinical, ultrasonography and biometry parameters, biochemical (L/S ratio) and Doppler flow studies of pulmonary circulation.30
20
 
Amniotic Fluid Volume Disorders
Amniotic fluid is essential for proper development of fetal respiratory, gastrointestinal tract, urinary and musculoskeletal systems as well as for proper fetal growth. Amniotic fluid is formed from various sources like fetal urine, tracheal secretions and transfer of fluid from the maternal blood across the placental surface as well as across fetal membranes. While fetal swallowing removes the amniotic fluid. Any change in the amniotic fluid volume can be because of any of these factors. 31 Hence careful assessment of amniotic fluid volume is vital part of anomalies scan. Oligohydramnios is caused mainly by fetal anomalies involving urinary tract, premature rupture of membranes and intrauterine growth restriction. Moderate to severe oligohydramnios causes lung hypoplasia, compression of fetal body as well as interfere in proper fetal anomalies scan. There is appreciable increase of fetal losses, morbidity. Polyhydramnios is caused by a variety of pathologies, both maternal and fetal, like maternal diabetes, iso-immunization, fetal anomalies (mainly gastrointestinal, central nervous system and urinary), chromosomal disorders, multiple gestations, hemoglobinopathy like alpha thalassemia and infection by parvovirus. It poses the risks of preterm labor, accidental hemorrhage, PIH, etc.
 
During and After Delivery
It is vital to evaluate the high risk pregnancies with suspected genetic/birth defects prior to the delivery. It is better to have a multispecialty team approach to evaluate the condition of the fetus, it’s maturity, any high risk factors about the neonatal resuscitation and any need for specialized facilities required so that the place, time and mode of delivery can be decided. It is always better to transfer a high risk fetus in situ to a appropriately equipped and staffed facility rather than transferring a critically ill fetus after delivery. The couple as well as the family should be properly counseled about the natural history of the disorder, special facilities like special diet/medication needed and the nature of post-delivery management.
In case of sad outcomes like termination of an affected pregnancy, stillbirths/neonatal death it is utmost important for the treating physicians to put across the need for confirmatory tests like postmortem, genetic/metabolic tests in a sympathetic but firm manner. The couple and the family are in a state of grief and shock and are unable to grasp the importance of such studies from future preconception counseling and evaluation. Properly conducted studies like these can be very valuable for confirmation of 21antenatal diagnosis, risk assessment, preconception evaluation and appropriate tests to be done in future pregnancies. Imaging modalities like MRI can be used in cases where the request, for postmortem is refused to get better idea about the details of structural anomalies diagnosed antenataly.
 
Presymptomatic and Predictive Genetic Diagnosis
After the advancements in laboratory technologies, better understanding of the structure and functioning of human genome achieved by the completion of Human Genome Project, we are able to diagnose or do screening of asymptomatic carriers in a large number of medical disorders at molecular level. This way it is possible to pick-up the disorder at an overt stage so that early pre-emptive treatment can be started so as to increase chances of survival and preserve quality of life. Identification of carriers in other family members can enable required surveillance tests which will permit timely diagnosis and appropriate therapy. Several familial cancers (familial adenomatous polyposis, breast cancers, retinoblastoma, von Hippel-Lindau disease, etc.), adult polycystic kidney disease and Huntington’s disease are some of such disorders.32
Of course such testing has it’s own ethical dilemmas like confidentiality of the client versus right of relatives to know the lab results, misuse of such information by third parties like insurers, employees governments with discrimination against the individual and prolonged period of anxiety when there is no clinical disease as yet.
 
CONCLUSIONS
The twenty first century already is and will be further dominated by genetics. With vast knowledge generated, by the recently completed Human Genome Project about the structure and function of Human Genome in health and disease, we are on the threshold of a revolution in field of screening, diagnosis and management of large number of genetic anomalies. As most of the genetic disorders/birth anomalies are not curable once they are manifested fully, only preventive genetics initiative will be more effective in alleviation of the significant pregnancy wastage, morbidity and mortality due to such genetic disorders.
It will take a shift in the mind set of general population and medical and paramedical workers and a concerted, multispecialty approach spanning all streams and branches of medicine and other related faculties that will yield the desired results. The spectacular advances in the fields of 22biotechnology, genetic engineering and pharmacogenetics are double-edged weapons and should be handled in a responsible and far sighted manner to avoid problems of eugenics, discrimination, ethical and religious insensitivity. The clash of maternal and fetal interests will also pose significant problems requiring adroit handling.
In spite of all these problems it is necessary for all of us to move ahead in making preventive genetics as an essential part of. The rewards will be worth the efforts healthcare.
REFERENCES
  1. Milunsky A, Milunsky J. Genetic counseling: preconception, prenatal and perinatal: population study. In: Milunsky A, John Hopkins (Eds). Genetic Disorders and the Fetus. Fifth edition 2004; 1.
  1. Baird PA, Anderson TW, Newcomb HB, et al. Genetic disorders in children and young adults. Am J Hum Genet 1988; 42:677.
  1. Verma IC. Burden of genetic disorders in India. Indian J Pediatr 2001; 67:893.
  1. Benn PA, Hsu LYF. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities through amniocentesis. In: Milunsky A, John Hopkins (Eds). Genetic Disorders and the Fetus. Fifth edition2004;214-15.
  1. Parris WCV, Quimby CW. Anesthetic considerations for the patient with homocystinuria. Anesth Analg 1982; 61:708.
  1. Lipscomb KJ, Smith JC, Clarke B, et al. Outcome of pregnancies in women with Marfan’s syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 104:201.
  1. Fuhrmann K, Reiher H, Semmler K, et al. Prevention of malformations in infants of insulin dependant diabetic mothers. Diabetic Care 2001; 24:1904.
  1. Milunsky A, Ulcickas M, Rothman KJ, et al. Maternal heat exposure and neural tube defects. JAMA 1992; 268:882.
  1. Nicolaides KH, Sebire NJ, Snijders JM. Nuchal translucency and maternal serum biochemistry. The 11–14 weeks scan. Parthenon Publishing. 1999; 38-41.
  1. Gogate SG, Purandarey HM, Talwalkar SC, Phadke AA, et al. First trimester combined screening for Down’s syndrome. Unpublished data presented at International Fetoscopy Group Meeting in Greece 2005.
  1. Brambati B, Lanzani A, Tului L. Transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villous sampling: efficiency and risk evaluation. Am J Med Genet 1990; 35:160.
  1. Brun JL, Mangione RGangho F, et al. Feasibility, accuracy and safety of chorionic villus sampling: a report of 10741 cases. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23:295.
  1. Jackson L, Wapner RJ. Chorionic villus sampling. In: Simpson JL, Elias S (Eds). Essentials of Prenatal Diagnosis. Churchil Livingston.  New York:  1993:
  1. Williams III J, Wang BB, Rubin CH, et al. Chorionic villus sampling: experience with 3016 cases performed by single operator. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:1023.
  1. Brambati B, Tului L, Cislaghi C, et al. First 10000 chorionic villus samplings performed on singleton pregnancies by a single operator. Prenat Diagn 1997; 18:255.
  1. Gogate SG, et al. Fetal tissue sampling for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes: an Indian experience. In: Chakravarty A, Purandarey HM, Gogate SG(Eds).Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy. Jaypee Brothers.  New Delhi:  1998:80-83.

  1. 23 Brambati B, Tului L. Prenatal Genetic diagnosis through chorionic villus sampling. In: Milunsky A (Ed). Genetic disorders and the fetus. Johns Hopkins University Press  Baltimore:  2004: 179-213.
  1. Proceedings of the BDR meeting. BDR News. Ed. Fetal Care Research Foundation;  Chennai, India  2005; 5: 1.
  1. Gogate SG, Talwalkar SC, Purandarey HM, Phadke AA. Second trimester screening for Down’s and NTD in Mumbai city. Unpublished data presented at the International Foetoscopy Group Meeting in France. 2003.
  1. Elias S, Simpson JL. Amniocentesis and fetal blood sampling. In: Milusky A (Ed). Genetic Disorders and the Fetus. John Hopkins University Press.  Baltimore:  2004: 81.
  1. Gogate SG, Purandarey HM, Shah PS, et al. Amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis: experience of over 500 cases. Unpublished data presented at the annual meeting of International Fetoscopy Group Meeting in Greece 2005.
  1. Weiner CP, Okamura K. Diagnostic fetal blood sampling related fetal losses. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996; 11: 169.
  1. Holzgreve W, Miny P, Schloo R, et al. Late CVS Registry: compilation of data from 24 centers. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10: 159.
  1. Podobnik M, Ciglar S, Singer Z, et al. Transabdominal chorionic villus sampling in the second and third trimesters of high risk pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 125.
  1. Kelkar GS. A Prenatal project in India. J of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health 2002; 16 (4): 331-39.
  1. Gogate SG, Rege V, Utture A, et al. Multispecialty fetal medicine program in Mumbai, first year’s experience. Unpublished data presented at International Foetoscopy Group meeting in France 2002.
  1. Gogate SG. Intrauterine growth restriction: obstetrician’s perspective. International J of Diabetes in developing countries 2001; 21 (1): 51-54.
  1. Wladimiroff JW. Prenatal diagnosis and management of abnormal fetal development in third trimester of pregnancy. In: Milunsky A (Ed). Genetic disorders and the fetus. John Hopkins University Press  Baltimore:  2004: 901-43.
  1. Sachdev HPS. Low birth weight in South Asia. International J of Diabetes in developing countries 2001; 21 (1): 13-27.
  1. Laudy JAM, Tibboel DG, Robben SGF, et al. Prenatal prediction of fetal lung hypoplasia: clinical biometric and Doppler velocity correlates. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 259.
  1. Brace RA. Physiology of amniotic fluid regulation. Clin obstet Gynecol 1997; 40: 280.
  1. Milunsky A. Presymptomatic and predictive genetic diagnosis. In: Milunsky A (Ed). Perseus Publishing:  Your genetic destiny 2001: 309-22.