INTRODUCTION
Corneal dystrophies are a heterogenous group of rare, inherited corneal diseases that are typically bilateral, symmetric, noninflammatory, slowly progressive, and usually bear no relationship to environmental or systemic factors. The word dystrophy is derived from Greek literature (dys = wrong, difficult; trophe = nourishment). Clinically, the corneal dystrophies are divided into three groups-based on the principal anatomic location of the abnormalities. It may affect the corneal epithelium and its basement membrane or Bowman layer and the superficial corneal stroma (anterior corneal dystrophies), the corneal stroma (stromal corneal dystrophies), or Descemet's membrane and the corneal endothelium (posterior corneal dystrophies). Most corneal dystrophies have no systemic manifestations and present with variable shaped corneal opacities in a clear or cloudy cornea and they affect visual acuity to different degrees.
PREVALENCE
Most of the published reports derive their prevalence data from the number of cases of corneal dystrophy undergoing keratoplasty. Some of the recent reports are summarized in the Table 1.1. While this may be an indicator of the prevalence of cases severe enough to warrant a corneal graft, it is not a true estimate of the prevalence of corneal dystrophy in the entire population.
CLASSIFICATION OF CORNEAL DYSTROPHIES
The increasing availability of genetic analyses highlighted the shortcomings of the phenotypic method of classification of corneal dystrophy. Abnormalities in different genes may produce a single phenotype, whereas various defects in a single gene can manifest as varying phenotypes.1 The International Committee for Classification of Corneal Dystrophies (IC3D) was developed to incorporate the traditional classification of corneal dystrophies with new genetic, clinical, and pathologic information.2 The anatomic classification continues to group dystrophies according to the structures predominantly involved. Each dystrophy carries a template summarizing genetic, clinical, and pathologic information.2
|
A category number from 1 through 4 is assigned depicting the level of evidence supporting the existence of the particular dystrophy. The most defined dystrophies belong to category 1 (a well-defined corneal dystrophy with a gene that has been mapped, identified and specific mutations are known) and the least defined belong to category 4 (a suspected dystrophy without substantial genetic evidence).2
Category 1: A well-defined corneal dystrophy in which the gene has been mapped and identified and specific mutations are known.
Category 2: A well-defined corneal dystrophy that has been mapped to 1 or more specific chromosomal loci, but the gene(s) remains to be identified.
Category 3: A well-defined corneal dystrophy in which the disorder has not yet been mapped to a chromosomal locus.
Category 4: This category is reserved for a suspected new, or previously documented, corneal dystrophy, although the evidence for it, being a distinct entity, is not yet convincing.
The category assigned to a specific corneal dystrophy can be expected to change over time as knowledge progressively advances. Eventually, all valid corneal dystrophies should attain the classification of category 1 (Table 1.2).
As clinical manifestations widely vary with the different entities, corneal dystrophies should be suspected when corneal transparency is lost or corneal opacities occur spontaneously, particularly in both corneas, and especially in the presence of a positive family history or in the offspring of consanguineous parents.
The management of the corneal dystrophies varies with the specific disease. Some are treated medically or with methods that excise or ablate the abnormal corneal tissue like phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK). Corneal transplantation—penetrating or lamellar—may be required for visual rehabilitation in advanced cases. Other less debilitating or asymptomatic dystrophies do not warrant treatment. The prognosis varies from minimal effect on the vision to corneal blindness, with marked phenotypic variability.
EPITHELIAL AND SUBEPITHELIAL DYSTROPHIES
Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy (EBMD)
Alternative names: Map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy, Cogan microcystic epithelial dystrophy, Anterior basement membrane dystrophy, Dystrophic recurrent erosion.3
|
Epithelial basement membrane dystrophy is characterized by recurrent corneal erosions (Fig. 1.1) as a result of abnormal epithelial basement membrane adhesion complexes.9 This dystrophy is the most commonly encountered anterior corneal dystrophy in clinical practice.
Inheritance
Most cases have no definite hereditary pattern. Autosomal dominant inheritance has been documented in a few cases.10
Genetic Locus
The genetic locus has been mapped to chromosome 5 (5q31); gene TGFBI has been isolated in a minority of cases.11,12
Symptoms
The disease manifests in adult life around 30 years of age. Familial cases may manifest earlier in childhood.
Patients may remain asymptomatic or develop recurrent erosions with pain, lacrimation, and blurred vision. Visual acuity is usually not affected. Irregular astigmatism and increase in higher-order aberration may cause blurred vision.
Signs5
This disease is characterized by the appearance of maps, dots and fingerprint lines.
Maps appear as gray geographical patches, best observed on broad tangential illumination (Fig. 1.2).
Dots (Cogan) are irregular round, oval or comma-shaped gray-white intraepithelial opacities; clustered like an archipelago in the central cornea. These occur in combination with other signs, especially with maps.5
Dots (Blebs of Bron and Brown) are small clear round dots clustered together, visible only on retroillumination.
Fingerprint lines are parallel, curvilinear branching lines with club shaped terminations. Refractile lines are seen on retroillumination.
Histopathology
The major pathology lies in the abnormal synthesis of the epithelial basement membrane. Recurrent erosions occur due to lack of hemidesmosomal connections between the epithelial cells and the abnormal basement membrane.
Maps are areas of projections of the abnormal multilamellar basement membrane into the epithelium; fingerprint lines represent rib-like intraepithelial extensions of basal laminar material; dots represent intraepithelial pseudocyst containing cytoplasmic debris.13
In vivo confocal microscopy images document the abnormal epithelial basement membrane protruding into the corneal epithelium, epithelial cell abnormalities, and microcysts.14 No abnormalities are observed in superficial epithelial cells or the stroma. Confocal microscopy has been reported to assist in the diagnosis of EBMD in patients suffering from recurrent erosion syndrome, particularly in patients with no corneal changes visible biomicroscopically.
Management
Corneal scrapping may be performed in cases of recurrent corneal erosions. Following the procedure, a soft contact lens is placed for 24 to 48 hours and topical antibiotics instilled. A five-year cumulative probability of recurrence of up to 44.7 percent has been reported following epithelial debridement for anterior basement membrane dystrophy.7
Conservative therapy with hypertonic sodium chloride (to dehydrate the epithelium, allowing it to adhere better) along with lubricating eye drops may be useful in reducing the frequency and severity of attacks. Torres Perez et al15 suggested that treatment of recurrent corneal erosions with erosion debridement may be better than stromal punctures with a 23 to 25 gauge needle since it implies less potential risks. Anterior stromal puncture by Nd:YAG laser has been reported to be an effective and simple procedure to treat recurrent corneal erosion with minimal complications.16
Phototherapeutic keratectomy using an excimer laser with low pulse energy and low number of pulses has been reported as an effective and minimally invasive treatment modality to achieve a fast and durable epithelial closure, to prevent recurrent corneal erosions, and to increase visual acuity in most patients. A success rate of 84.6 to 100 percent has been reported by various authors.17–20 Shallow ablations (mean ablation depth 4.6 microns) have been recommended by Zaidmman et al in view of decreased complications.18,19
Epithelial Recurrent Erosion Dystrophy (ERED)
Alternative name: Franceschetti recurrent epithelial dystrophy21
Variant: Dystrophia Smolandiensis.
Inheritance
Inheritance pattern is autosomal dominant. The genetic locus remains unknown.22
Symptoms
Most patients experience attacks of redness, photophobia, epiphora, and ocular pain due to corneal erosions (Fig. 1.4). Some may complain of sensitive eyes for years. Exposure to sunlight, dust and smoke and lack of sleep can precipitate attacks. Attacks generally decline in frequency and intensity and cease by the age of 50 years.7
Signs
Recurrent corneal erosions appear typically at 4 to 6 years of age but occasionally as early as 8 months of age. These may be precipitated by minimal trauma or may be spontaneous. The cornea may develop subepithelial haze or blebs between attacks. The Smolandiensis variant is characterized by recurrent corneal erosions, followed by the formation of central corneal keloid like opacities.23
Histopathology
Light microscopic examination reveals epithelial hyperplasia, absence of Bowman's layer and subepithelial fibrosis in cases with dystrophia Smolandiensis; the specimen being positive for Congo red, suggesting an amyloid deposit. The general morphological pattern of pathology (true keloid formation, absence of Bowman's layer, subepithelial fibrosis and abnormal subbasal nerves) probably reflects a novel phenotypic expression of the healing response to recurrent erosion of the corneal epithelium.23
Management
Recurrent erosions are managed similar to cases with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy.
In the Smolandiensis variant, a quarter of patients eventually require corneal grafts at mean age of 44 years. The opacities recur within 15 months in the graft periphery, but the central graft can remain clear for many years.8
Subepithelial Mucinous Corneal Dystrophy (SMCD)
Inheritance
This dystrophy has an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Genetic locus and gene remain unknown.24
Symptoms
The onset is characterized by frequent, recurrent corneal erosions in the first decade. These subside during adolescence with the formation of subepithelial opacities, causing progressive decreased vision.24
Signs
Bilateral, homogenous subepithelial haze is noted. The haze is most dense centrally, and fades towards the periphery.
Histopathology
Light microscopy reveals a subepithelial band of eosinophilic, periodic acid Schiff-positive, Alcian blue-positive, Masson trichrome-positive hyaluronidase-sensitive material anterior to the Bowman's layer. The overlying epithelium is thinned out. Immunohistochemistry staining is positive for combination of chondroitin-4-sulfate and dermatan sulfate.24
Management
Initial treatment includes management of recurrent corneal erosions. The superficial location of the pathology makes PTK a potential treatment modality.
Meesmann Corneal Dystrophy (MECD)
Alternate name: Juvenile hereditary epithelial dystrophy.
This bilateral, diffuse corneal dystrophy involves the accumulation of intracytoplasmic debris in the corneal epithelium, manifesting clinically with the formation of epithelial cysts.
Historical Perspective
This dystrophy was first described clinically by Pameijer.25 The histopathological description was given by Meesmann.26
Inheritance
Autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance and variable expressibility is seen in a majority of cases. Autosomal recessive form has been reported by Stocker and Holt.27
Genetic locus has been mapped to chromosome 12q13 (KRT3); and the gene Keratin K3 (KRT3) has been implicated.28 Locus 17q12 (KRT12) and gene Keratin K12 (KRT12) has been isolated in cases with the Stocker-Holt variant.29 These genes are known to encode cytoskeletal proteins.
Onset and Course
The dystrophy follows a slowly progressive course and majority of the patients may remain asymptomatic till the fourth or fifth decade of life.30,31 Patients with the Stocker-Holt variant demonstrate more severe signs and symptoms with earlier onset compared with classic Meesmann corneal dystrophy.27
Symptoms
Patients are usually asymptomatic till the fourth or fifth decade of life. Photophobia, redness and pain may occur due to recurrent corneal erosions with the rupture of the epithelial cysts. Most patients retain good functional vision, few may complain of blurred vision secondary to corneal irregularity and scarring.
Signs
Corneal involvement is usually bilateral. Multiple, tiny epithelial vesicles extend to the limbus and are most numerous in the interpalpebral area with clear surrounding epithelium. These appear as white spots on focal illumination and are seen as refractile cysts of retroillumnation. Cysts may coalesce to form refractile linear opacities with intervening areas of clear cornea.
Stocker-Holt variant encompasses the entire cornea. Fine, grayish punctate epithelial opacities that take up fluorescein and fine linear opacities in whorl-like pattern are visible.27
Histopathology
Light microscopy demonstrates intraepithelial cysts filled with periodic acid Schiff-positive cellular debris. The epithelium may be thickened and disorganized. Bowman's layer and anterior stroma are unaffected.
Transmission Electron Microscopy reveals intracytoplasmic “peculiar substance” representing a focal collection of fibrogranular material surrounded by tangles of cytoplasmic filaments.
Tuft et al32 reported hyporeflective areas in the basal epithelium ranging from 40 to 150 mm in diameter, with potential reflective spots inside visible on confocal microscopy.
Associations
Cremona et al33 reported a rare case of bilateral and symmetric Meesmann corneal dystrophy concurrent with bilateral epithelial basement membrane dystrophy and bilateral but asymmetric posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in a patient of Armenian origin.
Management
Most patients remain asymptomatic and may not require any treatment. Palliative treatment includes ocular lubricants, cycloplegia, and therapeutic contact lenses. In severe cases, management with epithelial debridement, phototherapeutic keratectomy, and lamellar keratoplasty has been advocated34 Yeung et al35 have suggested keratectomy with mitomycin C application in recurrent cases of Meesman's dystrophy.10
Lisch Epithelial Corneal Dystrophy (LECD)
Alternative names: Band-shaped and whorled microcystic dystrophy of the corneal epithelium.36
Inheritance
X-chromosomal dominant inheritance with genetic locus at Xp22.3 has been documented. The gene remains unknown.37
Symptoms
The disease onset is in childhood with a slowly progressive course. Most patients are usually asymptomatic. Patients may report blurred vision if the pupillary zone is involved.
Signs
Direct illumination reveals localized gray opacities of varying patterns: whorl-like, radial, band-shaped, flame or feathery-shaped, or club-shaped.38–40 Indirect illumination reveals intraepithelial multiple, densely crowded microcysts. The surrounding epithelium appears clinically normal. Similar degrees of opacities are noted in both men and women.
Histopathology
Light microscopy documents diffuse cytoplasmic vacuolization of all cells in the affected area.
Management
The corneal abnormalities have been reported to recur after corneal scrapping.41
Lisch et al42reported that wearing contact lenses for a longer duration causes a significant regression of corneal opacities in LECD (two cases reported). The etiology of this phenomenon was interpreted as a contact lens induced thinning of corneal epithelium and reduction of epithelial layers.
Gelatinous Drop-Like Corneal Dystrophy (GDLD)
Alternative names: Subepithelial amyloidosis; Primary familial amyloidosis.43
Inheritance
Inheritance pattern is autosomal recessive. The genetic locus has been isolated to 1p32; and tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (TACSTD2, previously M1S1) gene has been implicated.44,45
Symptoms
Patients present with significant decrease in vision, photophobia, irritation, redness, and lacrimation.
Signs
Onset of the disease is by the first to the second decade of life. Initial subepithelial lesions appear similar to band-shaped keratopathy. As they progress to form groups of small multiple nodules (Fig. 1.5), they acquire a mulberry configuration.11
Fig. 1.5: A case of gelatinous droplet corneal dystrophy with subepithelial, multiple, nodular lesions
Fig. 1.6: Stromal opacification and larger nodular kumquat-like lesions in a case of gelatinous droplet corneal dystrophy
These lesions show late staining with fluorescein, implying hyperpermeability of the corneal epithelium. Superficial vascularization may be noted. As the disease progresses, patients may develop stromal opacification (Fig. 1.6) or develop larger nodular kumquat-like lesions. This dystrophy is usually found in Japanese people, but has been reported in other regions of the world as well.4612
Histopathology
Light microscopy demonstrates subepithelial and stromal amyloid deposits. Disruption of epithelial tight junctions in the superficial epithelium and the presence of amyloid in the basal epithelial layer is visible on transmission electron microscopy.
Management
Corneal transplantation is required for visual rehabilitation.47,48 Deep lamellar keratoplasty has been reported to successfully treat gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy.49 Recurrence is common after keratoplasty, the disease may recur in nearly half the grafts. Lasram et al50 reported that the five cases of GDLD treated by them required multiple keratoplasties at a mean interval of five years because of recurrence of the disease on the corneal graft.
Ito et al.51 reported that PTK may be a safe and useful modality to remove corneal opacities that recur after lamellar grafts.
BOWMAN LAYER DYSTROPHIES
Reis–Bucklers Corneal Dystrophy (RBCD)
This dystrophy primarily involves the Bowman's layer with secondary alterations in the epithelium and the stroma.
Alternative names: Corneal Dystrophy of Bowman layer, type 1; Geographic corneal dystrophy (Weidle); Superficial granular corneal dystrophy; Atypical granular corneal dystrophy; Granular corneal dystrophy, type 3; Anterior limiting membrane dystrophy, type 1.
Historical Perspective
This dystrophy was first reported by Reis in 1917.52 Detailed description was given by Buckler in 1949.53
Inheritance
Autosomal dominant inheritance with variable expressibility has been noted. Genetic locus lies at 5q31; gene TGB1 has been implicated.54–56
Symptoms
Recurrent corneal erosions manifest as pain, redness and tearing in the first decade of life. These attacks become less severe after the second decade with progressive deterio-ration of vision. The visual loss is attributable to the diffuse opaque irregular surface.
Signs
Irregular and coarse geographic-like opacities are seen in the Bowman's layer and superficial stroma (Fig. 1.7), secondary to generalized replacement of the Bowman's layer by irregular collagen fibers.57 Opacities may be linear, geographical, honeycomb or ring like and are best seen with broad oblique illumination. Peripheral cornea is usually spared, although a diffuse haze extending up to the limbus may be seen in advanced cases. Corneal sensations are decreased and prominent corneal nerves may be noted.613
Fig. 1.7: Reis-Buckler dystrophy showing irregular and coarse geographic opacities in the Bowman's layer and superficial stroma
Histopathology
The Bowman's layer is replaced by a mass of irregularly placed collagen fibers, which in advanced cases can extend to the subepithelial stroma. Epithelial cells and anterior stromal keratocytes show degenerative changes such as swelling of the endoplasmic reticulum and vacuole formation. The posterior epithelial layer shows a saw-tooth configuration.
Subepithelial electron-dense, rod-shaped bodies are noted on electron microscopy. These rod-shaped bodies are immunopositive for transforming growth factor beta–induced protein (keratoepithelin). Electron microscopy is necessary to distinguish RBCD from the Thiel-Behnke Corneal Dystrophy where curly fibers are present.58 Laser confocal scanning may also enable differentiation of Theil Benke and Reis-Buckler dystrophy in vivo.59 In Thiel-Behnke corneal dystrophy, the deposits in the epithelial basal cell layer show homogeneous reflectivity with round edges accompanying dark shadows. In contrast, deposits in Reis-Bucklers corneal dystrophy in the same cell layer show extremely high reflectivity from small granular materials without any shadows. In each dystrophy, Bowman's layer is replaced totally with pathological materials; the reflectivity of those materials is reported to be much higher in Reis-Buckler corneal dystrophy than in Thiel-Behnke corneal dystrophy.
Management
Recurrent corneal erosions are treated in the initial stages. Phototherapeutic keratectomy has been reported to be an effective modality for the treatment of this dystrophy. Recurrence is common after this procedure. Dinh et al60 reported that 47 percent of the eyes with Reis-Bucklers dystrophy developed clinically significant 14recurrence after an average of 21.6 months after PTK. Adjunctive application of topical Mitomycin-C 0.02 percent may be helpful in reducing the recurrence of the disease after PTK.61 Corneal electrolysis has been reported to effectively treat subepithelial opacities in RBCD.62 Keratoplasty may be required in severe cases.63
Thiel–Behnke Corneal Dystrophy (TBCD)
Alternative names: Corneal dystrophy of Bowman layer, type 2 (CDB2); Honeycomb-shaped corneal dystrophy; Anterior limiting membrane dystrophy type 2; Curly fibers corneal dystrophy; Waardenburg-Jonkers corneal dystrophy.
Inheritance
Autosomal dominant inheritance with genetic locus at 10q24 has been demonstrated.64 The gene remains to be isolated.
Symptoms
Recurrent erosions begin in childhood. Slowly progressive deterioration of vision occurs with increasing corneal opacification. The erosions are less frequent, and the onset of visual impairment is later than in RBCD.
Signs
Symmetrical subepithelial reticular honeycomb like opacities are noted, sparing the peripheral cornea.65 Corneal sensations are normal. In advanced cases, opacities can progress to deep stromal layers and corneal periphery. It may be impossible to distinguish it clinically from Reis-Buckler corneal dystrophy.
Histopathology
A fibrillogranular material is deposited under the epithelium and projects into the overlying cells in a “saw-tooth” configuration. The epithelial basement membrane is thickened.
Electron microscopy demonstrates pathognomonic curly collagen fibers with a diameter of 9 to 15 nm and distinguishes this dystrophy from RBCD. These curly fibers are immunopositive for transforming growth factor beta–induced protein (keratoepithelin).58
The confocal images may also enable differentiation from RBCD.8
Grayson–Wilbrandt Corneal Dystrophy (GWCD)
Inheritance
Autosomal dominant inheritance pattern is seen. The genetic locus remains unknown.
Symptoms
The onset of the disease occurs at 10 to 12 years, later than RBCD. Corneal erosions are less severe and less frequent than in RBCD and TBCD. Visual acuity is usually preserved.
Signs
Bowman's layer demonstrates diffuse gray-white moundlike opacities extending anteriorly into the epithelium. The intervening cornea is clear, and the peripheral cornea is spared. The corneal sensations are preserved, unlike in RBCD.66,6715
Histopathology
Accumulation of abnormal material (PAS positive) in the basement membrane with disruptions in the Bowman's membrane is noted.
STROMAL DYSTROPHIES
Corneal stromal dystrophies are a group of inherited disorders of the cornea (Table 1.3) that are caused by progressive accumulation of deposits within the stroma. These deposits are not caused by inflammation, infection, or trauma, but by genetic mutations that lead to abnormal proteins resulting in the accumulation of insoluble material within the stroma. The disorders may or may not affect vision and may or may not be symmetrical. They usually present in the second to third decade of life. The major corneal dystrophies include lattice, granular, and macular dystrophy.
Lattice Dystrophy
Lattice dystrophy gets its name from an accumulation of amyloid deposits, or abnormal protein fibers, throughout the middle and anterior corneal stroma.
Inheritance
This dystrophy usually begins before the age of 20 years, and is inherited as an autosomal dominant disorder.
Symptoms and Signs
Early symptoms tend to be a ‘foreign body’ sensation and a slight deterioration in vision due to clear, comma-shaped overlapping dots and branching filaments in the corneal stroma, creating a lattice effect. As the dystrophy progresses, these lines become thicker and opaque that imparts a ground glass haze to the cornea and cause diminution of vision.
Types of Lattice Corneal Dystrophy
A network of delicate criss-cross branching filamentous opacities are seen within the cornea in two genetically distinct inherited disorders, one caused by specific mutations in the TGFBI (transforming growth factor-beta) gene with no systemic manifestations (LCD1) and the other resulting from a mutation in the gelsolin gene (LCD2). LCD 2 has systemic manifestations.
Lattice Corneal Dystrophy Type I (LCD1 Biber-Haab-Dimmer dystrophy)
It is a rare form of human corneal dystrophy that becomes apparent in both eyes towards the end of the first decade of life, but occasionally it begins in middle life and is rarely seen in infancy. LCD1 was first described by Swiss ophthalmologist Hugo-Biber in 1890.68 It has no systemic manifestations. The disease is bilateral, usually noted before the end of the first decade of life.
Inheritance: LCD1 is caused by mutations in TGFBI gene encoding keratoepithelin. Transforming growth factor, beta-induced, 68kDa, also known as TGFBI (initially called BIGH3, BIG-H3), is a protein which in humans is encoded by the TGFBI gene.69 This gene encodes a protein that binds to type 1, 2 and 4 collagens. It is found in many extracellular matrix proteins modulating cell adhesion and serves as a ligand recognition sequence for several integrins.16
The protein is induced by transforming growth factor-beta and acts to inhibit cell adhesion.
Symptoms: Recurrent corneal erosions manifest as pain, redness and tearing in the first decade of life. These attacks become less severe after the second decade with progressive deterioration of vision.
Signs: Filamentous opacities appear in the cornea with intertwining delicate branching processes, particularly within the central corneal stroma, while the peripheral cornea remains relatively transparent. Corneal sensation is often diminished and the interwoven linear opaque filaments have some resemblance to nerves. Recurrent corneal erosions may precede the corneal opacities and even appear in individuals lacking recognizable stromal disease (Fig. 1.8). Both corneas are usually symmetrically involved, but sometimes one cornea remains clear or has discrete rather than the linear opacities.
Histopathology: On light microscopy, epithelial atrophy and disruption with degeneration of basal epithelial cells; focal thinning or absence of Bowman's layer that progressively increases with age; eosinophilic layer between epithelial basement membrane and Bowman's layer; and stromal deposition of amyloid substance distorts the architecture of corneal lamellae. Amyloid deposits have characteristic staining. Deposits stain positive with Congo red. Green birefringence is visible with a polarizing filter and red-green dichroism when a green filter is added with this stain. Metachromasia is noted with crystal violet and fluorescence is noted with use of thioflavin T-staining. Descemet's membrane and endothelium are normal.18
Like nerves the linear deposits of LCD1 are argyrophilic in silver impregnated preparations, but nerves have not been identified in relation to the eosinophilic amyloid deposits. Amyloid deposits occur throughout the corneal stroma70 and coincide with the lattice pattern of lines and other opacities.71 The amyloid seems to react mainly with antibodies to the N-terminal sequence of TGFBIp and not with those to the C-terminal portion.72 The majority of cases of LCD1 throughout the world have been associated with a C→T transition at nucleotide 417 (417 C→T) in exon 4 of the TGFBI gene. This causes a p. Arg124Cys mutation in the affected codon.73
Lattice Corneal Dystrophy Type II (LCD2, Systemic Amyloidosis, Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy Type IV, Finnish or Meretoja Type)
LCD2 is most common in Finland, where the disease was first discovered and most extensively studied.74 In this disorder, both corneas contain randomly scattered short fine glassy lines, which are less numerous, more delicate and more radially oriented than those in LCD1 (Fig. 1.9). The peripheral cornea is chiefly affected and the central cornea is almost spared. The cornea has fewer amorphous deposits than LCD1.
Inheritance: Finnish type amyloidosis is a form of amyloidosis associated with gelsolin gene.75 In persons homozygous for the relevant mutation in the GSN gene, the disorder begins earlier.
Symptoms and signs: The abnormal protein fibers in LCD1 accumulate under the outer corneal layer-the epithelium. This can cause erosion of the epithelium, manifesting as recurrent corneal erosion. These erosions alter the normal corneal curvature, resulting in temporary vision problems; and expose the nerves that line the cornea, causing severe pain. Even the involuntary act of blinking can be painful. Recurrent epithelial erosions are common particularly from the first decade of life.
Fig. 1.9: Branching filaments in the corneal stroma, creating a lattice effect. A network of delicate, criss cross filamentous opacities are seen within the cornea in lattice dystrophy
In LCD 2, corneal sensitivity is reduced or absent. Visual acuity is usually normal until the sixth decade because the dystrophy progresses from the peripheral to central cornea. Dry eye symptoms are frequent, and corneal erosions may occur late in life. It has a slowly progressive course; the majority of affected individuals are in good health till the seventh decade. At around 40 years of age, some people with lattice dystrophy will have scarring under the epithelium, resulting in a haze on the cornea that can greatly obscure vision. In LCD2, the corneal abnormalities are accompanied by a progressive and bilateral cranial and peripheral neuropathy, dysarthria, a dry and extremely lax itchy skin with amyloid deposits. Associated conditions include cutis laxa76 and ataxia,77 a characteristic “mask-like” facial expression, protruding lips with impaired movement, pendulous ears and blepharochalasis are associated systemic features.
Histopathology: The amyloid in LCD2 is composed of a mutated 71 amino acid long fragment of gelsolin and this protein accumulates in the corneal stroma. In LCD2, amyloid deposits are found in the cornea, scleral, choroidal and adnexal blood vessels as well as in the lacrimal gland and perineurium of ciliary nerves. The amyloid is also found in the heart, kidney, skin, nerves, wall of arteries, and other tissues.78 Amyloid is deposited in the cornea in lattice lines, as a discontinuous band under Bowman layer and within the sclera. Streak-like deposits are seen between corneal lamellae, especially in the limbal cornea. Immunohistochemistry demonstrates deposition of mutated gelsolin in the conjunctiva, in the sclera, in the stroma of the ciliary body, along the choriocapillaris, in the perineurium of ciliary nerves, in the walls of ciliary vessels, and in the optic nerve. Extraocularly, amyloid is found in arterial walls, peripheral nerves and glomeruli. The amyloid within the cornea in LCD 2 reacts with the antigelsolin antibody.79 Two single base substitutions in the GSN gene, located on human chromosome 9 (9q34), which encodes the actin modulating protein gelsolin are known to cause LCD2 (p. Asp187Asn, p. Asp187Tyr).
Management: Recurrent epithelial erosions are treated with preservative free tear substitutes, ointments, eye patching, bandage contact lens or amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent defects. With effective care, these erosions usually heal within three days, although occasional sensations of pain may occur for the next six to eight weeks. Phototherapeutic Keratectomy (PTK) may be tried in all patients with superficially accentuated opacities in lattice dystrophy before undergoing a more invasive procedure, such as lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty.80
Corneal transplant is indicated in cases with epithelial scarring and corneal haze. Although, people with lattice dystrophy have an excellent chance for a successful transplant, the disease may also arise in the donor cornea in as little as three years. A corneal graft may be necessary in LCD1 by 20 years of age, but is usually not indicated until after the fourth decade. LCD1 is slowly progressive and usually substantial discomfort and visual impairment occurs before the sixth decade. The outcome of penetrating graft is excellent, but amyloid may deposit in the grafted donor tissue some 2 to 14 years later.
Incomplete removal of the recipient stroma by deep lamellar keratoplasty (DLKP) can lead to the recurrence of amyloidosis in the residual stroma in patients with LCD.81 The corneal lesions in LCD2 rarely warrant a penetrating keratoplasty, but when performed a neurotrophic persistent epithelial defect may develop. The results of 20the graft are generally good, but it is possible that the dystrophy may recur in the donor cornea within five to ten years. In one study, about half of the transplant patients with lattice dystrophy had a recurrence of the disease from between two to 26 years after the operation. Of these, 15 percent required a second corneal transplant.82 Early lattice and recurrent lattice arising in the donor cornea responds well to treatment with the excimer laser or anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Granular Corneal Dystrophy (GCD)
Subtle differences in the clinical appearance of the discrete corneal opacities permit two types of GCD to be recognized: GCD type I (GCD1) and GCD type II (GCD2). GCD2 tends to have fewer corneal deposits than GCD1 and the corneal deposits in GCD2 sometimes resemble a combination of GCD and LCD. GCD has been extensively studied in Denmark by Moller.83
Inheritance
Granular corneal dystrophy shows an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. It is caused by mutations in TGFBI gene encoding keratoepithelin.
Granular Corneal Dystrophy Type I GCD1, Corneal dystrophy Groenouw type I
It is a rare form of human corneal dystrophy. It was first described by German ophthalmologist Arthur Groenouw in 1890.84
Symptoms: Light sensitivity and ‘foreign body’ sensation may be a problem. Vision is not usually severely affected under the age of 50 years.
Signs: It usually occurs before the age of 20 years. Early on, the vision is not affected but grayish dots can be seen through a microscope. Slowly the dots become larger and more apparent and become visible to the naked eye. The clinical picture is characterized by multiple, small, white discrete irregular-shaped sharply demarcated spots that resemble bread crumbs or snowflakes and become apparent beneath Bowman zone in the superficial central corneal stroma (Fig. 1.10). They initially appear within the first decade of life and may be evident by 3 years of age. The opaque spots are often arranged in lines and with time they gradually enlarge and become more numerous. In children, the external corneal surface is smooth, but in adults it may become uneven. While some patients have only a few corneal granules, others eventually have multiple opacities and subsequently, the cornea becomes markedly opaque. Visual acuity is more or less normal. By the end of the second decade, opacities are present in the central and superficial cornea but rarely in the deep stroma. Intervening tissue between the opacities and the peripheral 2 to 3 mm of the cornea usually remains crystal clear (Fig. 1.11). The opaque spots eventually extend throughout the central two-thirds of the cornea. On confocal microscopy, multiple, hyper reflective opacities are evident. Confocal microscopy with anterior segment optical coherence tomography may provide sufficient diagnostic information to diagnose corneal granular dystrophies in a clinical setting.85
Histopathology: The light microscopic and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) appearance and staining attributes of the corneal deposits in GCD are diagnostic.21
Fig. 1.10: Granular corneal dystrophy with granules composed of extremely small, translucent dots and opacities that do not extend to the corneal limbus
Fig. 1.11: Intervening tissue between the opacities and the peripheral 2 to 3 mm of the cornea usually remains crystal clear in a case of granular corneal dystrophy
Eosinophilic deposits in GCD consist predominantly of an extracellular deposition of mutant TGFB1 protein, which stains a brilliant red with the Masson trichrome stain. With the reticulin stain, the accumulations appear to contain tangles of argyrophilic fibers. The deposits react with histochemical methods for protein as well as with 22antibodies to TGFB1 protein. The granules stain positively with luxol fast blue and are reported to stain positively with antibodies to microfibrillar protein. By TEM, characteristic electron dense, discrete, rod-shaped or trapezoid bodies are evident.86 Some rod-shaped structures appear homogeneous without a discernible inner structure; others, however, are composed of an orderly array of closely packed filaments (70–100 nm in width) orientated parallel to their long axis, while others appear moth-eaten with variable-shaped cavities containing fine filaments. Descemet's membrane and the corneal endothelium are unremarkable, and so is the cornea between the deposits.
Granular Corneal Dystrophy Type II
Granular corneal dystrophy type II (GCD 2, Avellino corneal dystrophy, combined granular–lattice corneal dystrophy) was first described by Folberg et al in 1988.87 The ancestry of some families with GCD2 have been traced to the Avellino district of Italy (hence the synonym Avellino corneal dystrophy).
Symptoms: Glare and photophobia are early symptoms. Visual acuity decreases as opacification progresses with age. Recurrent erosions are seen frequently. Homozygote has more severe symptoms and show rapid disease progression.
Signs: Slit lamp examination reveals well-defined granules that appear white on direct illumination. On retroillumination, these granules are composed of extremely small, translucent dots with the appearance of vacuoles, glassy splinters, or crushed bread crumbs. Opacities do not extend to the corneal limbus. In children, there may be a vortex pattern of brownish granules superficial to the Bowman's layer. In later life, granules may extend into the deeper stroma down to Descemet's membrane.
As the condition progresses, the opacities become more confluent in the superficial cornea, resulting in a significant reduction of visual acuity. In most cases of GCD, visual acuity remains good until late in the course of the disease. Confocal microscopy demonstrates features of both GCD1 and LCD. Reflective, breadcrumb-like round deposits with well-delineated borders or highly reflective, irregular trapezoidal deposits are present in the anterior stroma (similar to GCD1). Linear and branching deposits with changing reflectivity are observed (similar to LCD).
Histopathology: On light microscopy, corneal opacities extend from the basal epithelium to the deep stroma. Although, there is deposition of both typical GCD1 deposits and amyloid; individual opacities stain with either Masson trichrome or Congo red. Homozygotes demonstrate more severe findings. On TEM, anterior stromal rod-shaped, electron-dense deposits composed of extracellular masses of fine, electron-dense, highly aligned fibrils are noted. An extremely common ultrastructural finding is the presence of randomly aligned fibrils of amyloid.
Management: Many individuals with GCD never require corneal grafting because vision is usually not sufficiently impaired. Until relatively recently, a penetrating keratoplasty had been the traditional method for treating GCD, but postoperative recurrent disease can be detected in the donor tissue and even along the suture tracts within several years, particularly in GCD2.88 After a penetrating keratoplasty, the graft usually remains free of recurrence for at least 30 months, but the opacities 23may recur in the grafts within a year, usually superficial to the donor tissue, even with lamellar grafts, or at the host-graft interface.
Phototherapeutic keratectomy has been advocated as an initial therapy for GCD, but recurrent disease is still a common complication. Similarly, Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) using the Melles technique89 and automated lamellar keratoplasty90 can restore and preserve useful visual function for a significant period in these patients in spite of recurrence. Intralase femtosecond assisted lamellar keratoplasty has also been described recently to treat Avellino dystrophy.91 Injury to the central cornea may result in exacerbation of the corneal dystrophy. GCD2 may also be exacerbated by laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and radial keratotomy (RK).92 LASIK,93 LASEK and other forms of refractive surgery are hence contraindicated in individuals with GCD2.
Macular Corneal Dystrophy (MCD, Fehr Corneal Dystrophy, Corneal Dystrophy Groenouw type II)
It is the least common but the most severe of the 3 major stromal corneal dystrophies.
Inheritance
This dystrophy is inherited in autosomal recessive fashion and is thought to be caused by the lack or abnormal configuration of keratan sulfate (KS). Keratan sulfate is one of the major glycosaminoglycans of the corneal stroma and plays an important role in corneal transparency. Most cases of MCD are caused by mutations in CHST6 (Carbohydrate sulfotransferase 6) gene.94 The most frequent abnormalities are missense and nonsense single nucleotide polymorphisms in CHST6 that alter a conserved amino acid.
Symptoms
Eye pain from recurrent corneal erosions can occur but is much less common than in patients with lattice or granular dystrophies. Over time, the nontransparent areas progressively merge as the entire corneal stroma gradually becomes cloudy, causing severe visual impairment.
Signs
Macular corneal dystrophy involves the entire thickness of the cornea and is more superficial centrally and deeper peripherally. The first signs are usually noticed in the first decade of life, and progress afterwards, with opacities developing in the cornea.
It is characterized by multiple, gray-white opacities in the corneal stroma that extend out into the peripheral cornea. These stromal opacities are distributed throughout the cornea without clear spaces. Initially, diffuse stromal haze develops extending to the limbus; later, superficial, central, elevated, irregular whitish opacities (macules) develop and give the condition its name (Fig. 1.12). Unlike granular dystrophy, there are no clear areas between corneal opacities. There are also more posterior peripheral white lesions. The cornea is thinner than normal in early disease. In the advanced stage, the corneal endothelium is affected and Descemet membrane develops guttate excrescenses. In addition, the stroma thickens from the imbibition of water from endothelial decompensation.24
Fig. 1.12: Macular corneal dystrophy with stromal opacities distributed throughout the cornea without clear spaces
Histopathology
Macular dystrophy is characterized by an intracellular storage of glycosaminoglycans within keratocytes and the corneal endothelium combined with an extracellular deposition of similar material in the corneal stroma and Descemet's membrane. The deposits stain with Alcian blue. Three immunophenotypes of MCD are recognized,95 one has no detectable keratan sulfate (KS) in the serum or cornea (MCD type I), another has normal amounts of KS in the serum and cornea (MCD type II) and a third lacks detectable antigenic keratan sulfate in the serum, but has stainable KS in the keratocytes (MCD type IA). Because keratan sulfate in the serum appears to be predominantly derived from the normal turnover of cartilage, these studies strongly suggest that the defect in keratan sulfate synthesis in macular corneal dystrophy is not restricted to corneal cells and that this condition is one manifestation of a systemic disorder of keratan sulfate.96
On electron microscopy, delicate fibrillogranular material can be discerned within the vesicles. Some corneal endothelial cells contain similar material. Numerous electron-lucent lacunae are randomly distributed throughout the cornea and some lacunae are filled with clusters of abnormal sulfated proteoglycan filaments. The collagen fibrils have a normal diameter, but the interfibrillar spacing of collagen fibrils in affected corneas is less than that in the normal cornea. This close packing of collagen fibrils seems to be responsible for the reduced corneal thickness in MCD. The posterior nonbanded portion of Descemet's membrane contains numerous corneal guttae.25
Management
In MCD, vision can be restored by corneal grafting, but the disease may recur in the graft after many years. Conventionally, the condition affects the entire corneal stroma, Descemet's membrane and the corneal endothelium; a lamellar keratoplasty will not excise all of the pathologic tissue. However, DALK with the big-bubble technique can be considered for visual rehabilitation in cases with no significant Descemet's membrane and endothelial involvement (Fig. 1.13).97
Congenital Stromal Corneal Dystrophy (CSCD; Witschel Dystrophy)
Congenital stromal corneal dystrophy (CSCD; Witschel dystrophy) is an extremely rare, nonprogressive form of corneal dystrophy.
Inheritance
Its inheritance is autosomal dominant and is linked to mutations in DCN gene encoding decorin. This protein is a component of connective tissue, binds to type I collagen fibrils, and plays a role in matrix assembly protein.
Symptoms
Corneal erosions, photophobia and corneal vascularization are absent. Strabismus or primary open angle glaucoma was noted in some of the affected patients.
Signs
The main features of the disease are numerous opaque flaky or feathery areas of clouding in the stroma that multiply with age and eventually preclude visibility of 26the endothelium. Thickness of the cornea stays the same, Descemet's membrane and endothelium are relatively unaffected, but the fibrills of collagen that constitute stromal lamellae are reduced in diameter.
Histopathology
In CSCD, the morphologic abnormalities include a peculiar arrangement of tightly packed lamellae having highly aligned collagen fibrils of an unusually small diameter.98 The abnormally small stromal collagen fibrils and disordered lamellae suggest a disturbance in collagen fibrogenesis.
Management
Penetrating keratoplasty or lamellar keratoplasty may be eventually required when vision becomes significantly impaired. Associated manifestations may be managed with spectacles or contact lenses for correction of refractive errors; patching and/or surgical correction for strabismus may be required in the initial stages of the disease.
Fleck Corneal Dystrophy (FCD, Francois-Neetens Speckled Corneal Dystrophy)
Inheritance
It is caused by mutations in PIP5K3 gene.
Symptoms
The disease is nonprogressive and in most cases asymptomatic, with mild photophobia reported by some patients.
Signs
FCD affects males and females equally and has been observed throughout life and even in children as young as 2 years. Multiple nonprogressive, symmetric minute opacities, some of which resemble “flecks”, are scattered in the stroma of affected patients. Other opacities look more like snowflakes or clouds with distinct borders in the central and peripheral cornea with intervening portions of the cornea being normal. The corneal epithelium, Bowman layer, and Descemet's membrane are unremarkable. Corneal sensation is usually normal.
Histopathology
Corneal tissue with FCD has rarely been examined, but some keratocytes contain fibrillogranular material within intracytoplasmic vacuoles or pleomorphic electron-dense and membranous intracytoplasmic inclusions.99 The stored material reacts positively with alcian blue, colloidal iron, Sudan black B and oil red O stains and is partially sensitive to hyaluronidase and β-galactosidase.
Management
As it does not affect vision and is usually asymptomatic and does not require treatment. LASIK does not stimulate visually significant exacerbation of Fleck corneal dystrophy.10027
Posterior Amorphous Corneal Dystrophy (PACD)
Inheritance
The chromosomal locus of the gene responsible for the autosomal dominant PACD has not been determined.
Symptoms
Visual acuity is usually minimally impaired.
Signs
It is characterized clinically by irregular, amorphous sheet-like opacities in posterior corneal stroma and Descemet's membrane. The abnormalities are observed in infancy and childhood and, in contrast to the traditional corneal dystrophies, noncorneal manifestations have been reported including abnormalities of the iris (iridocorneal adhesions, corectopia, and pseudopolycoria). Transparent corneal stroma may intervene between opacities, while the Descemet's membrane and the corneal endothelium may show focal abnormalities.
Histopathology
Disorganized posterior stromal collagen lamellae, and an attenuated corneal endothelium have been observed.101 A zone of collagen fibers may interrupt the Descemet's membrane beneath the anterior banded layer.
Management
Treatment is usually not required for this dystrophy as it does not affect vision.
DESCEMET'S MEMBRANE AND ENDOTHELIAL DYSTROPHIES
Fuchs’ Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD)
Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy is a bilateral, progressive disease involving the corneal endothelium manifesting as corneal edema and progressive deterioration of vision (Fig. 1.14). The condition was first described by Austrian Ernst Fuchs (1851–1930), after whom it is named.102
Inheritance
The inheritance of FED is autosomal dominant with genetic and environmental modifiers such as increased prevalence in the elderly and in females. Cases without known inheritance may constitute the majority.
Genetic Locus
Genetic loci involved in Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy have been isolated at 13pTel-13q12.13, 15q and18q21.2-q21.32.
Early-onset variant Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy may involve locus 1p34.3-p32 and the gene affecting collagen type VIII, Alpha 2-COL8A2. Some authors have disputed the role of these genes in the pathogenesis of FCD and the genetic basis of this disease remains to be fully elucidated.103–10628
Associations
Fuchs’ dystrophy has been reported to be associated with cardiovascular disease, keratoconus, age-related macular degeneration, short axial length, narrow anterior chamber angles and open angle glaucoma.107,108
Signs and Symptoms
Most cases begin in the fourth decade or later but the early variant starts in the first decade.107 Most studies suggest that FED more commonly affects females, with as high as 4:1 female preponderance. The increased incidence in females has led to speculation about the role of hormones in the pathogenesis of FED.
Stage 1: This is the stage of cornea guttata. It occurs in the fourth or fifth decade of life when slit lamp examination by specular reflection reveals cornea guttata in the central part of the corneal endothelium. The excrescences of corneal guttata increase in number and may become confluent, resulting in a beaten metal appearance of the endothelial surface. Pigment dusting of the endothelium may be noted. The condition spreads from the center toward the periphery. The corneal thickness and visual acuity remain unaffected. The patient is asymptomatic.
Stage 2: This stage is characterized by deterioration in vision caused by incipient edema of the corneal stroma. As the stroma becomes edematous, the cornea acquires a ground glass appearance. The patients complain halos around lights, blurred vision and glare. Vision may improve as the day progresses owing to evaporation and subsequent corneal deturgescence.
Stage 3: The edema progresses to involve the epithelium at this stage. Epithelial microcysts manifest as bedewing on retroillumination. As these cysts enlarge and coalesce, they form larger intraepithelial or subepithelial bullae. When these bullae rupture, they cause pain and discomfort.29
Stage 4: This stage is characterized by corneal scarring following rupture of bullae cause diminution of vision, while ameliorating the pain. Peripheral vascularization may be noted.
Histopathology
Light microscopy reveals diffuse thickening and lamination of Descemet's membrane with hyaline excrescences on thickened Descemet's membrane (guttae). Degeneration, thinning, and reduction of endothelial cells is noted. Transmission Electron Microscopy demonstrates multiple layers of basement membrane like material on the posterior part of Descemet's membrane with degeneration of endothelial cells.108 Stromal thickening secondary to edema causes disorganization and disruption of the lamellar pattern of collagen fibers. Confocal microscopy reveals polymegathism and pleomorphism of the endothelial cells. Subepithelial bullae formation may be seen on the anterior corneal surface. Subepithelial fibrosis may be seen subsequent to rupture of bullae. The Bowman membrane is normal, unless it has been involved in ulcer formation and keratitis, after the rupture of a bulla.
The following 5 stages on specular microscopic evaluation may be seen, as described by Laing et al.109
Stage 1: The guttate excrescences are seen as dark structures with sharply defined single bright spots at their center. They are smaller in size than a single endothelial cell and do not lie near the boundary wall of the cell.
Stage 2: The excrescence is almost the size of the endothelial cell. The surrounding cells have a stretched appearance.
Stage 3: The excrescence is considerably larger, and many cells are involved in one lesion. The dark structure is 5 to 10 times the size of an endothelial cell. The adjacent cells are abnormal and have missing boundaries. Many lesions are seen close to each other, but they do not coalesce. The excrescences are of 2 types, a smooth round shape or a rough excrescence.
Stage 4: The individual excrescences have coalesced. The net result is multilobed, rather than a round outline. The dark areas have many bright spots. The multilobulated structures cover considerable area. The cells between the excrescence masses tend to become abnormal. Coalesced areas contain both the smooth and the rough variety of excrescences.
Stage 5: An organized mosaic of endothelial cells is difficult to see. Many stages may be observed in the different areas of the same eye.
Management
Conservative Treatment
Patients of FCD with clear corneas (Stage 1) do not require treatment. When corneal decompensation sets in medical therapy may be initiated and can be continued till good functional vision is maintained; beyond which keratoplasty is necessary.
- Dehydrating agents
- – Sodium chloride 5 percent eye drops especially in the early hours of the day; Sodium chloride ointment is used at bedtime.
- – Glycerine can be used for diagnostic purposes such as fundus evaluation as it causes rapid dehydration and clearing of the cornea.
- A hair dryer, placed at arm's distance, can be used to enhance evaporation and cause corneal deturgescence for temporary improvement of symptoms.
- Antiglaucoma agents should be administered in cases with concomitant glaucoma. Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors should be avoided they hinder the activity of endothelial pump.
- Supportive treatment for ruptured bullae
- – Anterior stromal punctures may be indicated.
- – Soft therapeutic contact lenses.
- – Cycloplegics, local antibiotics with bandaging of the affected eye.
Keratoplasty: Changing Trends
Corneal transplantation remains the definitive treatment for advanced cases of FCD. Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) has been performed for many years to restore vision in patients with FCD. Chung et al suggested in patients with insufficient endothelial cell density like in FCD, a large trephine size could reduce chronic endothelial cell loss.114
Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) which selectively replaces the posterior layers of the cornea has recently emerged as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for patients with endothelial diseases, including Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy.115 Endothelial keratoplasty provides distinct advantages over PK, in that it is a less invasive procedure and leads to more rapid recovery of vision. Additionally, this procedure does not require long-term corneal sutures, eliminating problems with suture breakage, suture abscesses, astigmatism, and wound dehiscence. Disadvantages of EK include the need for specially prepared donor tissue and additional surgeon training or experience. Patients with significant corneal scarring and vascularization (Stage 4) may also not be amenable to DSAEK and require a full thickness graft.
Refractive ametropia and astigmatism are reported to be significantly less in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)-treated eyes than in PK-treated eyes, even after suture removal and arcuate keratotomy.116 DSAEK seems to be superior to PK in treating Fuchs’ endothelial keratoplasty in terms of faster visual recovery and decreased dependence on contact lenses and glasses. DSAEK, however, has a significant learning curve and may have initial endothelial cell loss greater than the conventional full thickness graft.117
Cataract extraction may be required in many of the patients of FCD. Anticipating the correct intraocular lens power for a patient undergoing cataract surgery alone followed by DSAEK or combined cataract surgery with DSAEK requires understanding the hyperopic shift that can occur with DSAEK and incorporating this correction preoperatively in the intraocular lens power selection.118
Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has been reported to effectively restore physiologic pachymetry and clarity, but donor preparation and attachment currently are more challenging than with DSAEK.119 This limits the widespread acceptance of the DMEK procedure over the currently popular DSAEK.31
Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy (PPCD)
Alternative Name: Schlichting Dystrophy120
In posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy, dystrophic endothelial cells acquire epithelial characteristics, leading to secondary abnormalities in the Descemet's membrane.121
Inheritance
Autosomal dominant inheritance with low penetrance and variable expression is seen.122–126 Isolated unilateral cases have been reported, with similar phenotype but no heredity.
PPCD 1: Genetic locus isolated to 20p11.2–q11.2; gene remains unknown.
PPCD 2: Genetic locus mapped to 1p34.3–p32.3; gene collagen type VIII alpha 2, COL8A2 is involved.
PPCD 3: Genetic locus localized to 10p11.2; gene two-handed zinc-finger homeodomain transcription factor 8 is implicated.
Associations
Symptoms
Endothelial alterations often asymptomatic and are noted on slit lamp examination. Endothelial changes often unchanged over years. Rarely extensive and progressive visual impairment may occur due to stromal clouding (Fig. 1.15). Vision loss may also be secondary to iridiocorneal adhesions and glaucoma.
Signs
Disease onset is in childhood and involvement is often asymmetric. Deep corneal lesions of various shapes including nodular, vesicular (isolated, in clusters, or confluent) and blister-like lesions are observed.130 Stromal and epithelial edema due to endothelial decompensation is rarely seen (Fig. 1.16). Peripheral iridocorneal adhesions have been reported in about 25 percent of cases, and elevated intraocular pressure in 15 percent of cases.130 Lipid deposition or band keratopathy have been reported in advanced cases. A congenital variant may manifest with corneal edema at birth.
Histopathology
“Epithelialization” of endothelial cells occurs and they are seen to acquire characteristics like cytoplasmic keratin, desmosomal junctions and microvilli. Metaplastic fibroblast-like endothelial cells have also been reported.131 The altered endothelial cells are capable of migrating over the trabecular meshwork, thereby producing glaucoma. The posterior nonbanded layer of the Descemet's membrane is abnormal in cases of PPMD, thickened with deposition of abnormal collagen. Rare cases of the congenital variant may involve the anterior banded layer. Stromal and epithelial changes may occur secondary to edema due to endothelial dysfunction.
Confocal microscopy demonstrates vescicular and linear abnormalities along with bright nucleus like structures in the endothelial cells.132,133 Vesicular lesions appear as rounded dark areas with some cell detail apparent in the middle giving a doughnut-like appearance. Railroad track appearance of band-like dark area with irregular edges enclosing some smaller lighter cells resembling epithelium-like cells may be noted.33
Management
Most cases are asymptomatic and may not require any treatment. Corneal transplantation may be required in severe cases. In a series of 120 cases of PPMD, 10 percent were reported to require a corneal graft. Coexisting glaucoma and iridiocorneal adhesions may compromise graft survival in these cases.
Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy 1 (CHED1)
Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy type 1 is characterized by bilateral, diffuse, noninflammatory corneal edema with markedly increased corneal thickness. It has not been consistently associated with any systemic disease.
Inheritance
Autosomal dominant inheritance with genetic locus at 20p 11.2-q11.2 (pericentromeric region) is seen. The gene involved remains to be isolated.134
Signs
Children affected with CHED1 have clear corneas at birth. Corneal clouding with a diffuse haze begins from the first to second year of life and progresses to a ground-glass appearance over 5 to 10 years. Thickening of the cornea can be up to 2 to 3 times normal thickness. The corneal opacification extends up to the limbus and there are no interevening clear areas (Fig. 1.17). Bullae are unusual despite the extensive stromal edema, unlike in cases with FCD.135 Co-existing congenital glaucoma and band keratopathy have also been reported.136
Fig. 1.17: Milder form of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. The hazy cornea does not preclude iris details completely
Symptoms
Early symptoms include photophobia and tearing. Progressive corneal clouding leads to blurred vision. Visual acuity in cases of CHED1 tends to be better than in CHED2 and nystagmus is absent.137
Histopathology
Diffuse thickening and lamination of Descemet's membrane and atrophic endothelial cells are seen on light microscopy. Stromal thickening is associated with disorganized arranged of the collagen fibers with disruption of the lamellar pattern.135 Subepithelial fibrosis has been noted in some cases of CHED1.
Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy 2 (CHED2)
Alternative name: Maumenee corneal dystrophy.138
Inheritance
Autosomal recessive inheritance pattern is seen. Genetic locus has been localized to 20p13 (telomeric portion); the Solute carrier family 4, sodium borate transporter, member 11 gene has been implicated.139,140
Signs and Symptoms
This form is more severe than CHED1 with onset at birth or in the neonatal period. Corneal clouding is dense at the time of presentation and does not tend to progress (Fig. 1.18). Nystagmus is usually present, possibly secondary to the severe visual impairment.137 Congenital glaucoma may be co-existing but falsely elevated intraocular pressure measurement due to stromal edema may lead to misdiagnosis.
Fig. 1.18: Diffuse corneal clouding (ground glass appearance) in a case of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy
Histopathology
Diffuse thickening and lamination of Descemet's membrane with deposition of multiple layers of basement membrane—like material on the posterior part of Descemet's membrane has been noted. Endothelial cells appear atrophic and may be absent.
Management of CHED
Corneal transplantation remains the definitive treatment for CHED. Pediatric keratoplasty, however, is a surgically challenging procedure and demands intensive postoperative monitoring and therapy. The timing of the surgery remains controversial in view of the possible challenges and complications. While some recommend early surgery, others suggest delaying the procedure as long as the patient demonstrates good fixation and normal alignment.145,146
Schaumberg et al reported 2-year survival rate of first grafts performed for CHED at a median age of 40 months to be 71%.147 However, just four of the 10 eyes attained a visual acuity of 20/200 or better. They concluded that penetrating keratoplasty for CHED in children has a reasonable chance of surgical success when performed at a young age; however, the prognosis for improved visual acuity in children appears to be more guarded. Javadi et al reported the absence of a relationship between postoperative visual outcome and age at keratoplasty, and advocated a conservative approach and careful risk-benefit ratio evaluation in patients with CHED.148
DSAEK remains a theoretical option in the treatment of CHED but technical difficulties during Descemet's membrane scoring and stripping and poor visualization have been reported to prevent successful completion of the procedure.149
X-linked Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (XECD)
Inheritance
X-chromosomal dominant inheritance with genetic locus at Xq25 has been reported. The involved gene remains unknown.150
Symptoms
Males may complain of progressive blurred vision while females are asymptomatic.
Signs
Congenital clouding ranging from a diffuse haze to a ground-glass, milky appearance have been reported in male patients with advanced involvement.150 Moon crater–like endothelial changes have been observed in both males and females.
Histopathology
Light microscopy reveals irregular thickening of Descemet's membrane with small excavations and pits (moon crater endothelial changes).150
Management
REFERENCES
- Gupta SK, Hodge WG. A new clinical perspective of corneal dystrophies through molecular genetics. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1999; 10 (4): 234–41.
- Weiss JS, Møller HU, Lisch W, et al. The IC3D classification of the corneal dystrophies. Cornea 2008; 27 (suppl 2): S1–83.
- Kanavi MR, Javadi MA, Sanagoo M. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Iran. Cornea 2007; 26 (5): 561–3.
- Dorrepaal SJ, Cao KY, Slomovic AR. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in a tertiary referral centre in Canada, 1996–2004. Can J Ophthalmol 2007; 42 (2): 244–50.
- Sony P, Sharma N, Sen S, Vajpayee RB. Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in northern India. Cornea 2005; 24 (8): 989–91.
- Tan DT, Janardhanan P, Zhou H, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes: The Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. Ophthalmology 2008; 115 (6): 975–82.
- Dobbins KR, Price Jr, FW Whitson WE. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States. Cornea 2000; 19 (6): 813–6.
- Ghosheh FR, Cremona F, Ayres BD, et al. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 2001–2005. Eye Contact Lens 2008; 34 (4): 211–4.
- Bron AJ, Tripathi RC. Cystic disorders of the corneal epithelium II. Pathogenesis. Br J Ophthalmol 1973; 57: 361–75.
- Laibson PR, Krachmer JH. Familial occurrence of dot (microcystic), map, fingerprint dystrophy of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1975; 14: 397–9.
- Boutboul S, Black GCM, Moore JE, et al. A subset of patients with epithelial basement membrane corneal dystrophy have mutations in TGFBI/BIGH3. Hum Mutat 2006; 27: 553–7.
- Munier FL, Korvatska E, Djemai A, et al. Kerato-epithelin mutations in four 5q31-linked corneal dystrophies. Nat Genet 1997; 15: 247–51.
- Rodrigues MM, Fine BS, Laibson PR, et al. Disorders of the corneal epithelium. A clinicopathologic study of dot, geographic, and fingerprint patterns. Arch Ophthalmol 1974; 92: 475–82.
- Labbé A, Nicola RD, Dupas B, et al. Epithelial basement membrane dystrophy: Evaluation with the HRT II Rostock Cornea Module. Ophthalmology 2006; 113 (8): 1301–8.
- Itty S, Hamilton SS, Baratz KH, et al. Outcomes of epithelial debridement for anterior basement membrane dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144 (2): 217–21.
- Torres Pérez JD, Herreras Cantalapiedra JM, Jiménez Benito FJ, et al. Anterior stromal puncture for recurrent corneal erosion. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2002; 77 (5): 257–62.
- Tsai TY, Tsai TH, Hu FR, et al. Recurrent corneal erosions treated with anterior stromal puncture by neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Ophthalmology 2009; 116 (7): 1296–300.
- Pogorelov P, Langenbucher A, Kruse F, et al. Long-term results of phototherapeutic keratectomy for corneal map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy (Cogan-Guerry). Cornea 2006; 25 (7): 774–7.
- Zaidman GW, Hong A. Visual and refractive results of combined PTK/PRK in patients with corneal surface disease and refractive errors. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32 (6): 958–61.
- Chow AM, Yiu EP, Hui MK, et al. Shallow ablations in phototherapeutic keratectomy: long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31 (11): 2133–6.
- Bourges JL, Dighiero P, Assaraf E, et al. Phototherapeutic keratectomy for the treatment of Cogan's microcystic dystrophy. J Fr Ophtalmol 2002; 25 (6): 594–8.
- Franceschetti A. Hereditaere rezidivierende Erosion der Hornhaut. Z Augenheilk 1928; 66: 309–16.
- Wales HJ. A family history of corneal erosions. Transophthalmol Soc NZ 1956; 8: 77–8.
- Hammar B, Lagali N, Ek S, et al. Dystrophia Smolandiensis: A novel morphological picture of recurrent corneal erosions. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; Aug 14.
- Pameijer JK. Ueber eine Fremdariege Familiere ObrflEchliche Hornhaurtver Enderung (German) Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1935; 95: 516.
- Meesmann A. U¨ber eine bisher nicht beschriebene dominant vererbte Dystrophia epithelialis corneae. Ber Zusammenkunft Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 1938; 52: 154–8.
- Stocker FW, Holt LB. Rare form of hereditary epithelial dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol 1955; 53: 536.
- Szaflik JP, O3dak M, Maksym RB, et al. Genetics of Meesmann corneal dystrophy: A novel mutation in the keratin 3 gene in an asymptomatic family suggests genotype-phenotype correlation. Mol Vis 2008; 14: 1713–8.
- Seto T, Fujiki K, Kishishita H, et al. A novel mutation in the cornea-specific keratin 12 gene in Meesmann corneal dystrophy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2008; 52 (3): 224–6.
- Burns RP. Meesmann's corneal dystrophy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1968; 66: 530–635.
- Fine BS, Yanoff M, Pitts E, et al. Meesmann's epithelial dystrophy of the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol 1977; 83: 633–42.
- Tuft S, Bron AJ. Imaging the microstructural abnormalities of Meesmann corneal dystrophy by in vivo confocal microscopy. Cornea 2006; 25: 868–70.
- Cremona FA, Ghosheh FR, Laibson PR, et al. Meesmann corneal dystrophy associated with epithelial basement membrane and posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophies. Cornea 2008; 27 (3): 374–7.
- Jalbert I, Stapleton F. Management of Symptomatic Meesmann Dystrophy. Optom Vis Sci 2009; Sep 7.
- Yeung JY, Hodge WG. Recurrent Meesmann's corneal dystrophy: Treatment with keratectomy and mitomycin C. Can J Ophthalmol 2009; 44 (1): 103–4.
- Charles NC, Young JA, Kunar A, et al. Band-shaped and whorled microcystic dystrophy of the corneal epithelium. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1761–64.
- Lisch W, Buttner A, Offner F, et al. Lisch corneal dystrophy is genetically distinct from Meesmann corneal dystrophy and maps to Xp22.3. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 461–8.
- Butros S, Lang GK, Alvarez de Toledo J, et al. The different opacity patterns of Lisch corneal dystrophy. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006; 223 (10): 837–40.
- Alvarez-Fischer M, de Toledo JA, Barraquer RI, et al. Lisch corneal dystrophy. Cornea 2005; 24 (4): 494–5.
- Robin SB, Epstein RJ, Kornmehl EW. Band-shaped, whorled microcystic corneal dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994; 117: 543–4.
- Lisch W, Steuhl KP, Lisch C, et al. A new, band-shaped and whorled microcystic dystrophy of the corneal epithelium. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 114 (1): 35–44.
- Klintworth GK, Valnickova Z, Kielar RA, et al. Familial subepithelial corneal amyloidosis— a lactoferrin-related amyloidosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 2756–63.
- Ren Z, Lin PY, Klintworth GK, et al. Allelic and locus heterogeneity in autosomal recessive gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Hum Genet 2002; 110: 568–77.
- Tsujikawa M, Kurahashi H, Tanaka T, et al. Identification of the gene responsible for gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Nat Genet 1999; 21: 420–3.
- Ide T, Nishida K, Maeda N, et al. A spectrum of clinical manifestations of gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy in Japan. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 1081–4.
- Toshida H, Uesugi Y, Nakayasu K, et al. Keratoplasty for gelatinous-drop like corneal dystrophy. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol 1995; 49: 449.
- Huo YN, Yao YF. Current advances in gene diagnosis and therapy of gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2006; 35 (2): 228–32.
- Higaki S, Hori Y, Maeda N, et al. Long-term results of deep lamellar keratoplasty using grafts with endothelium. Acta Ophthalmol 2008; 86 (1): 49–52.
- Lasram L, Rais C, el Euch M, et al. Gelatinous dystrophy of the cornea. Apropos of 5 cases. J Fr Ophtalmol 1994; 17 (1): 24–8.
- Reis W. Familiare, fleckige Hornhautentartung. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1917; 43: 575.
- Bucklers MU. ber eine weitere familiare Hornhaut-dystrophie (Reis). Klin Monatsbl Augenkeilkd 1949; 114: 386–97.
- Wheeldon CE, de Karolyi BH, Patel DV, et al. A novel phenotype-genotype relationship with a TGFBI exon 14 mutation in a pedigree with a unique corneal dystrophy of Bowman's layer. Mol Vis 2008; 14: 1503–12.
- Konishi M, Yamada M, Nakamura Y, et al. Immunohistology of keratoepithelin in corneal stromal dystrophies associated with R124 mutations of the BIGH3 gene. Curr Eye Res 2000; 21: 891–6.
- Small KW, Mullen L, Barletta J, et al. Mapping of Reis-Bucklers corneal dystrophy to chromosome 5q. Am J Ophthalmol 1996; 121: 384–90.
- Jones ST, Stauffer LH. Reis Buckler corneal dystrophy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1970; 74: 417.
- Kuchle M, Green WR, Volcker HE, et al. Reevaluation of corneal dystrophies of Bowman's layer and the anterior stroma (Reis-Bucklers and Thiel-Behnke types): A light and electron microscopic study of eight corneas and a review of the literature. Cornea 1995; 14: 333–54.
- Kobayashi A, Sugiyama K. in vivo laser confocal microscopy findings for Bowman's layer dystrophies (Thiel-Behnke and Reis-Bucklers corneal dystrophies). Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 69–75.
- Dinh R, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, et al. Recurrence of corneal dystrophy after excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1999; 106 (8): 1490–7.
- Miller A, Solomon R, Bloom A, et al. Prevention of recurrent Reis-Bücklers dystrophy following excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy with topical mitomycin C. Cornea 2004; 23 (7): 732–5.
- Kamoi M, Mashima Y Kawashima M, et al. Electrolysis for corneal opacities in a young patient with superficial variant of granular corneal dystrophy (Reis-Bücklers corneal dystrophy). Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139 (6): 1139–40.
- Pandrowala H, Bansal A, Vemuganti GK, et al. Frequency, distribution, and outcome of keratoplasty for corneal dystrophies at a tertiary eye care center in South India. Cornea 2004; 23 (6): 541–6.
- Yee RW, Sullivan LS, Lai HT, et al. Linkage mapping of Thiel-Behnke corneal dystrophy (CDB2) to chromosome 10q23-q24. Genomics 1997; 46: 152–4.
- Thiel HJ, Behnke H. Eine bisher unbekannte subepitheliale hereditare Hornhautdystrophie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1967; 150: 862–74.
- Grayson M, Wilbrandt H. Dystrophy of the anterior limiting membrane of the cornea (Reis-Bucklers type). Am J Ophthalmol 1966; 61: 345–9.
- Kurome H, Noda S, Hayasaka S, et al. A Japanese family with Grayson-Wilbrandt variant of Reis-Bücklers’ corneal dystrophy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1993; 37 (2): 143–7.
- Biber H. Uber einige seltenere Hornhauterkrankungen. Zurich, 1890. Inaugural Dissertation, Zurich, 1890. Cited by O. Haab: Die gittrige Keratitis.
- Munier FL, Korvatska E, Djemaï A, Le Paslier D, Zografos L, Pescia G, Schorderet DF. “Kerato-epithelin mutations in four 5q31-linked corneal dystrophies”. Nat. Genet 1997; 15 (3): 247–51.
- Eifrig Jr, DE Afshari NA, Buchanan HW IV, Bowling BL, Klintworth GK. Polymorphic corneal amyloidosis: a disorder due to a novel mutation in the TGFBI (BIGH3) gene. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 1108–14.
- Klintworth GK: Lattice corneal dystrophy. An inherited variety of amyloidosis restricted to the cornea. Am J Pathol 1967; 50: 371–99.
- Konishi M, Yamada M, Nakamura Y, Mashima Y: Immunohistology of kerato-epithelin in corneal stromal dystrophies associated with R124 mutations of the BIGH3 gene. Curr Eye Res 2000; 21: 891–6.
- Meretoja J. Familial systemic paramyloidosis with lattice dystrophy of the cornea, progressive cranial neuropathy, skin changes and various internal symptoms. A previously unrecognized heritable syndrome. Ann Clin Res 1969; 1: 314–24.
- de la Chapelle A, Kere J, Sack GH, Tolvanen R, Maury CP. Familial amyloidosis, Finnish type: G654-a mutation of the gelsolin gene in Finnish families and an unrelated American family. Genomics 1992; 13: 898–901.
- Kiuru-Enari S, Keski-Oja J, Haltia M Cutis laxa in hereditary gelsolin amyloidosis. Br. J. Dermatol 2005; 152 (2): 250–7.
- Tanskanen M, Paetau A, Salonen O, et al. Severe ataxia with neuropathy in hereditary gelsolin amyloidosis: A case report”. Amyloid 2007; 14 (1): 89–95.
- Meretoja J: Comparative histopathological and clinical findings in eyes with lattice corneal dystrophy of two different types. Ophthalmologica 1972; 165: 15–37.
- Gorevic PD, Munoz PC, Rodrigues MM, Haltia M, Ghiso J, Frangione B. Shared gelsolin antigenicity between familial amyloidosis Finnish type (FAF) and one form of familial lattice corneal dystrophy (LCD) with polyneuropathy from the United States. In Amyloid and Amyloidosis Edited by: Natvig JB, Forre Ol, Husby g, Husebekk A, Skogen B, Sletten K, Westermark P. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht: 1991: 423–35.
- Das S, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy for granular and lattice corneal dystrophy: A comparative study. J Refract Surg 2005; 21 (6): 727–31.
- Yao YF, Jin YQ, Zhang B, Zhou P, Zhang YM, Qiu WY, Mou SL, Wu LQ. Recurrence of lattice corneal dystrophy caused by incomplete removal of stroma after deep lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 2006; 25 (10 suppl 1): S41–6.
- Marcon AS, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR. Recurrence of corneal stromal dystrophies after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 2003; 22 (1): 19–21.
- Moller HU. Granular corneal dystrophy Groenouw type I. Clinical aspects and treatment. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1990; 68: 384–9.
- Groenouw A. Knoetchenfoermige Hornhauttruebungen. Graefe Arch. Ophthal 1898; 46: 85–102.
- Dalton K, Schneider S, Sorbara L, Jones L Confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography imaging of hereditary granular dystrophy. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33 (1): 33–40.
- Akiya S, Brown SI. Granular dystrophy of the cornea. Characteristic electron microscopic lesion. Arch Ophthalmol 1970; 84: 179–92.
- Folberg R, Alfonso E, Croxatto JO, Driezen NG, Panjwani N, Laibson PR, Boruchoff SA, Baum J, Malbran ES, Fernandez-Meijide R. Clinically atypical granular corneal dystrophy with pathologic features of lattice-like amyloid deposits. A study of these families. Ophthalmology 1988; 95 (1): 46–51.
- Holland EJ, Daya SM, Stone EM, Folberg R, Dobler AA, Cameron JD, Doughman DJ. Avellino corneal dystrophy. Clinical manifestations and natural history. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 1564–8.
- Salouti R, Hosseini H, Eghtedari M, Khalili MR. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with melles technique for granular corneal dystrophy. Cornea 2009; 28 (2): 140–3.
- Chen W, Qu J, Wang Q, Lu F, Barabino S. Automated lamellar keratoplasty for recurrent granular corneal dystrophy after phototherapeutic keratectomy. J Refract Surg 2005; 21 (3): 288–93.
- Agarwal A, Brubaker JW, Mamalis N, Kumar DA, Jacob S, Chinnamuthu S, Nair V, Prakash G, Meduri A, Agarwal A. Femtosecond-assisted lamellar keratoplasty in atypical Avellino corneal dystrophy of Indian origin. Eye Contact Lens 2009; 35 (5): 272–4.
- Feizi S, Pakravan M, Baradaran-Rafiee AR, Yazdani S. Granular corneal dystrophy manifesting after radial keratotomy. Cornea 2007; 26: 1267–9.
- Klintworth G. Corneal dystrophies Orphanet J Rare Dis 2009; 4: 7.
- Thonar EJ, Meyer RF, Dennis RF, Lenz ME, Maldonado B, Hassell JR, Hewitt AT, Stark Jr, WJ Stock EL, Kuettner KE, Klintworth GK. Absence of normal keratan sulfate in the blood of patients with macular corneal dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 1986; 102: 561–9.
- Akama TO, Nishida K, Nakayama J, Watanabe H, Ozaki K, Nakamura T, Dota A, Kawasaki S, Inoue Y, Maeda N, Yamamoto S, Fujiwara T, Thonar EJ, Shimomura Y, Kinoshita S, Tanigami A, Fukuda MN. Macular corneal dystrophy type I and type II are caused by distinct mutations in a new sulphotransferase gene. Nat Genet 2000; 26: 237–41.
- Patel AK, Nayak H, Kumar V. Comparative evaluation of big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in a case of macular corneal dystrophy. Cornea 2009; 28 (5): 583–5.
- Bredrup C, Knappskog PM, Majewski J, Rodahl E, Boman H. Congenital stromal dystrophy of the cornea caused by a mutation in the decorin gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 420–6.
- Purcell Jr, JJ Krachmer JH, Weingeist TA. Fleck corneal dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol 1977; 95: 440–4.
- Banning CS, Larson PM, Randleman JB. Outcome of LASIK in fleck corneal dystrophy. Cornea 2006; 25 (10): 1262–4.
- Carpel EF, Sigelman RJ, Doughman DJ. Posterior amorphous corneal dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 1977; 83: 629–32.
- Fuchs E. Dystrophia epithelialis corneae. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1910; 76: 478–508.
- Hemadevi B, Srinivasan M, Arun Kumar J, et al. Genetic analysis of patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy in India. BMC Ophthalmol 2010; 10 (1): 3.
- Riazuddin SA, Eghrari AO, Al-Saif A. Linkage of a mild late-onset phenotype of Fuchs corneal dystrophy to a novel locus at 5q33.1-q35.2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50 (12): 5667–71.
- Krachmer JH, Purcell Jr, JJ Joung CW, et al. Corneal endothelial dystrophy. A study of 64 families. Arch Ophthalmol 1978; 96: 2036–9.
- Sundin OH, Jun A, Broman KW, et al. Linkage of late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy to a novel locus at 13ptel-13q12.13. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 140–5.
- Hogan MJ, Wood J, Fine M. Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 78: 363–83.
- Waring GO III, Rodrigues MM, Laibson PR. Corneal dystrophies. II. Endothelial dystrophies. Surv Ophthalmol 1978; 23: 147–68.
- Laing RA, Leibowitz HM, Oak SS, et al. Endothelial mosaic in Fuchs’ dystrophy. A qualitative evaluation with the specular microscope. Arch Ophthalmol 1981; 99 (1): 80–3.
- Sharma N, Prakash G, Sinha R, et al. Indications and outcomes of phototherapeutic keratectomy in the developing world. Cornea 2008; 27 (1): 44–9.
- Pires RT, Tseng SC, Prabhasawat P, et al. Amniotic membrane transplantation for symptomatic bullous keratopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117 (10): 1291–7.
- Alino AM, Perry HD, Kanellopoulos AJ, et al. Conjunctival flaps. Ophthalmology 1998; 105 (6): 1120–3.
- Zemba M. Palliative treatment in bullous keratopathy. Oftalmologia 2006; 50 (2): 23–6.
- Chung SH, Kim HK, Kim MS. Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss after Penetrating Keratoplasty in Relation to Preoperative Recipient Endothelial Cell Density. Ophthalmologica 2009; 224 (3): 194–8.
- Rose L, Kelliher C, Jun AS. Endothelial keratoplasty: Historical perspectives, current techniques, future directions. Can J Ophthalmol 2009; 44 (4): 401–5.
- Price MO, Gorovoy M, Benetz BA, et al. Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes Compared with Penetrating Keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study. Ophthalmology 2010; 117 (3): 438–44.
- Eghrari AO, Daoud YJ, Gottsch JD. Cataract surgery in Fuchs corneal dystrophy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010; 21 (1): 15–9.
- Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM, et al. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 2009; 116 (12): 2361–8.
- Schlichting H. Blasen-und dellenfo¨rmige Endotheldystrophie der Hornhaut. Klin Monatsbl Augenkeilkd 1941; 107: 425–35.
- Rodrigues MM, Waring GO, Laibson PR, et al. Endothelial alterations in congenital corneal dystrophies. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 80: 678–89.
- Hosseini SM, Herd S, Vincent AL, et al. Genetic analysis of chromosome 20-related posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy: Genetic heterogeneity and exclusion of three candidate genes. Mol Vis 2008; 14: 71–80.
- Aldave AJ, Yellore VS, Principe AH, et al. Candidate gene screening for posterior polymorphous dystrophy. Cornea 2005; 24: 151–5.
- Shimizu S, Krafchak C, Fuse N, et al. A locus for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD3) maps to chromosome 10. Am J Med Genet 2004; 130: 372–7.
- Heon E, Mathers WD, Alward WL, et al. Linkage of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy to 20q11. Hum Mol Genet 1995; 4: 485–8.
- Krafchak CM, Pawar H, Moroi SE, et al. Mutations in TCF8 cause posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and ectopic expression of COL4A3 by corneal endothelial cells. Am J Hum Genet 2005; 77: 694–708.
- Bower KS, Edwards JD, Wagner ME, et al. Novel corneal phenotype in a patient with alport syndrome. Cornea 2009; 28 (5): 599–606.
- Harissi-Dagher M, Dana MR, Jurkunas UV. Keratoglobus in association with posterior polymorphous dystrophy. Cornea 2007; 26 (10): 1288–91.
- Cremona FA, Ghosheh FR, Rapuano CJ, et al. Keratoconus associated with other corneal dystrophies. Cornea 2009; 28 (2): 127–35.
- Cibis GW, Krachmer JA, Phelps CD, et al. The clinical spectrum of posterior polymorphous dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol 1977; 95: 1529–37.
- Krachmer JH. Posterior polymorphous endothelial dystrophy: A disease characterized by epithelial like endothelial cells which influence management and prognosis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1985; 83: 413–75.
- Patel DV, Grupcheva CN, McGhee CNJ. in vivo microscopy of posterior polymorphous dystrophy. Cornea 2005; 24: 550–4.
- Szaflik JP, Kolodziejska U, Udziela M, et al. Posterior polymorphous dystrophy-changes in corneal morphology in confocal microscopy. Klin Oczna 2008; 110 (7–9): 252–8.
- Toma NMG, Ebenezer ND, Inglehearn CF, et al. Linkage of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy to chromosome 20. Hum Mol Genet 1995; 4: 2395–8.
- Pearce WG, Tripathi RC, Morgan G. Congenital endothelial corneal dystrophy. Clinical, pathological, and genetic study. Br J Ophthalmol 1969; 53: 577–91.
- Ramamurthy B, Sachdeva V, Mandal AK, et al. Coexistent congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy and congenital glaucoma. Cornea 2007; 26 (6): 647–9.
- Judisch GF, Maumenee IH. Clinical differences of recessive congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy and dominant hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 1978; 85: 606–12.
- Maumenee AE. Congenital hereditary corneal dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 1960; 50: 1114–24.
- Jiao X, Sultana A, Garg P, et al. Autosomal recessive corneal endothelial dystrophy (CHED2) is associated with mutations in SLC4A11. J Med Genet 2007; 44: 64–8.
- Khan AO, Al-Shehah A, Ghadhfan FE. High measured intraocular pressure in children with recessive congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2010; 47 (1): 29–33.
- Akhtar S, Bron AJ, Meek KM. Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy and band keratopathy in an infant with corpus callosum agenesis. Cornea 2001; 20 (5): 547–52.
- Mahmood MA, Teichmann KD. Corneal amyloidosis associated with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea 2000; 19 (4): 570–3.
- Kirkness CM, McCartney A, Rice NS, et al. Congenital hereditary corneal edema of Maumenee: Its clinical features, management, and pathology. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987; 71: 130–44.
- Graham MAR, Azar NF, Dana MR. Visual rehabilitation in children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001; 41: 9–18.
- Sajjadi H, Javadi MA, Hemmati R, et al. Results of penetrating keratoplasty in CHED: Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea 1995; 14: 18–25.
- Schaumberg DA, Moyes AL, Gomes JA, et al. Corneal transplantation in young children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Multicenter Pediatric Keratoplasty Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 127 (4): 373–8.
- Javadi MA, Baradaran-Rafii AR, Zamani M, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty in young children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea 2003; 22 (5): 420–3.
- Pineda R 2nd, Jain V, Shome D, et al. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: Is it an option for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy? Int Ophthalmol 2010; 30 (3): 307–10.
- Schmid E, Lisch W, Philipp W, et al. A new, X-linked endothelial corneal dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 478–87.