Critical Care in Dermatology Arun C Inamadar, Aparna Palit
INDEX
×
Chapter Notes

Save Clear


Dermatological Emergencies: General Considerationschapter 1

Arun C Inamadar
 
INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITION
Emergency medicine or critical care medicine is a well-established subspecialty of internal medicine. Of late the concept of ‘emergency dermatology/critical care in dermatology’ is gaining importance in day-to-day dermatology practice. With introduction and innovation of newer molecules for the management of various dermatological conditions, gone are the days of using GV lotion alone! Special situations like pregnancy, neonate and associated metabolic disorders and comorbid conditions demand critical care.
The explosion of new medical knowledge and resultant technologies for patient care has changed the scope of dermatology. Dermatologists play a key role in diagnosis and management of skin disorders in intensive care units and emergency departments as well as in the more traditional outpatient arena. All practicing dermatologists must now not only be familiar with the classic dermatological disorders but also be able to recognize, evaluate, and treat emergencies in dermatology.
We must salute the forethought of Shuster, the great dermatologist, who dealt with ‘systemic manifestations of cutaneous disorders’ way back in 1967. His treatise on this subject is the basis of coinage of the term ‘acute skin failure’ and rationale for intensive care in dermatology.
The concept of dermatologic intensive care unit (DICU) is also gaining wider acceptance, as it has become mandatory to manage patients with acute skin failure, e.g. toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), etc., in an aseptic 2environment with multispecialty consultation and all the necessary gadgets for maintaining vitals, fluid and electrolyte balance. It is almost akin to ‘burn ward’. In fact dermatological emergencies are still managed in burn ward in many parts of the world.
Burn injury affects skin integrity and partial thickness burns usually blister. In patients with burn, the barrier function against fluid loss is totally damaged. Burn injury is a dynamic process that peaks at about 3 days after the thermal trauma. TEN is a widespread immunological injury leading to epidermal loss in sheets leaving a dark red oozing dermis as compared to the burn injury which involves the deep dermis too. TEN carries worse prognosis than burns of the same extent because of systemic involvement like hepatitis, hematological abnormalities, and subclinical interstitial edema culminating into frank pulmonary edema. Required quantity of fluid replacement also differs in both the conditions. Hence, it was right by Professor Rene Touraine to shove a unit devoted to the intensive care of dermatological diseases way back in 1976 amidst the criticism he faced from his colleagues.
The word ‘emergency’ may be defined as follows:
  • An unforeseen combination of circumstances or the resulting state that calls for immediate action. (Webster's medical desk dictionary)
  • A sudden serious and dangerous event or situation which needs immediate action to deal with it. (Oxford dictionary)
In the medical field ‘emergency’ stands for ‘immediate action’ to tackle the unforeseen (expected or unexpected) complication of the disease process or those arising from use of the therapeutic agents.
 
DERMATOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES: MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM
It is often a challenge for a dermatologist to provide effective care for more serious, life-threatening conditions that require immediate intervention. Skin conditions that may require intensive care are relatively rare. Hence, it is difficult for individual dermatologists to gain experience of managing such cases. The magnitude of the problem can be gauged from the list of certain dermatological conditions in which mortality ranges from minimal to very high (Table 1.1).
In a secondary analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme Database (Critical care 2008), data was extracted for 476,224 admissions to 178 intensive care units (ICU) in England, Wales and Northern Ireland participating in the programme over the time period from December 1995 to September 2006. They identified admissions with dermatological conditions from the primary and secondary reasons for admission to ICU, and total 2,245 dermatological admissions were identified. Conditions included infections (e.g. cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis), dermatological malignancies, and acute skin failure (e.g. Stevens–Johnson 3syndrome [SJS], TEN, and autoimmune blistering diseases).
Table 1.1   Mortality associated with various dermatological emergencies
Dermatologic emergency
Mortality (%)
Neonatal erythroderma
16%
SSSS
< 0.5%
TSS
  Menstrual
  Nonmenstrual
13–15%
03-05%
Meningococcemia with DIC
>50%
Necrotizing fasciitis
59%
Rocky mountain spotted fever (RMSF)
30–70%
Neonatal varicella
20–23%
Neonatal HSV
04–85%
Dengue shock syndrome
40–50%
Candidiasis in neonates
08–40%
Kasabach- Merritt phenomenon
20–30%
Purpura fulminans
50–100%
Kawasaki disease
0.1–02%
Sclerema neonatorum
50–100%
Drug reactions
  SJS
  DHS
  TEN
05%
10–38%
30%
Anaphylaxis
<10%
Hereditary angioedema
02%
Catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
50%
Acute GVHD (moderate to severe)
50%
These represented 0.47% of all ICU admissions, or approximately 2.1 dermatological admissions/ICU/year. Overall mortality was 28.1% in the ICU and 40% in hospital. Length of stay in intensive care was longest for those with acute skin failure (median 4.7 days for ICU survivors and 5.1 days for ICU non-survivors). They identified patients who not only required intensive care, but also dermatological care. Such patients (UK ICU population) had high mortality rate and long ICU stay, similar to other acute medical conditions. This highlights the importance of skin failure as a distinct entity comparable to other organ system failure.
The incidence of SJS and TEN are better characterized, and have been estimated at 0.4 to 1.2 and 1.2 to 6 million person years, respectively. There is a slightly increased risk in females. Mortality from erythema 4multiforme (EM) does not exist but may occur in 10% for patients with SJS, approximately 30% for patients with SJS/TEN-overlap and almost 50% for patients with TEN. For SJS, SJS/TEN-overlap and TEN together the mortality rate is almost 25%. In order to evaluate the mortality due to SJS/TEN, time of death in relation to the onset of the reaction, age of the patient, underlying diseases and the amount of skin detachment have to be considered. Medications most commonly associated with these conditions are sulfonamide and non-sulfonamide antibiotics, anticonvulsants and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Of these medications, sulfonamides have the highest risk. In the era of HIV/AIDS and increased incidence of associated oppurtunistic infections, the list of drugs causing severe cutaneous drug reaction is expanding. Abacavir hypersensitivity is a well-known entity. Nevirapine (antiretroviral) and lamotrigine (antiepileptic) are the newer drugs added to the list of drugs causing SJS/TEN.
In an overview of the major causes responsible for erythroderma from 13 reviews quoted in Mark Lebwohl's ‘Difficult diagnoses in dermatology’, approximately half of all the cases were secondary to primary dermatological condition (eczema, psoriasis, pemphigus foliaceus, lichen planus and pityriasis rubra pilaris), with remaining cases occurring due to systemic drug reactions, malignancy and of undetermined etiology. In a study involving 91 patients with erythroderma, the disease specific mortality was 18%.
Ten to 25% of angioedema patients are due to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) therapy, occurring in 1–2/1000 new users.
 
CLASSIFICATION
Emergencies in dermatology may result from:
  1. Primary skin diseases
  2. Systemic disorders with cutaneous manifestations.
Prompt recognition and diagnosis with subsequent appropriate treatment might improve the prognosis in both the categories. Table 1.2 presents the list of conditions which may result in dermatological emergency.
 
APPROACH TO A PATIENT WITH DERMATOLOGICAL EMERGENCY
Given the extensive list of causes of ‘acute skin failure’ and ‘erythroderma’ requiring the critical care, it is imperative that the clinicians have an organized approach to the diagnosis of these conditions. It should cover the history, physical examination and laboratory evaluation.5
Table 1.2   Conditions resulting in dermatological emergency
1. Erythroderma
2. Psoriasis:
  1. Psoriatic erythroderma
  2. Acute generalized pustular psoriasis of Von Zumbusch
3. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions:
  1. SJS-TEN
  2. Drug hypersensitivity syndrome
  3. Urticaria/Angioedema
  4. Serum sickness
  5. Drug-induced anaphylaxis
4. Anaphylaxis
5. Vascular disorders:
  1. Urticaria/angioedema
  2. Purpura fulminans
  3. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
  4. Calciphylaxis
  5. Kawasaki disease
6. Collagen vascular disorder:
  1. Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus
7. Complicated vascular tumors:
  1. Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon
  2. Multifocal/diffuse neonatal hemangiomatosis
8. Vesiculobullous disorders:
  1. Genetic blistering disorders
  2. Immunobullous disorders
9. Infections:
  1. Necrotizing fasciitis
  2. Meningococcemia
  3. Disseminated gonococcal infection
  4. Rocky mountain spotted fever
  5. Dengue hemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome
10. Bacterial toxin mediated illnesses:
  1. Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome
  2. Toxic shock syndrome
  3. Scombroid fish poisoning
11. Leprosy reactions:
  1. Acute neuritis with nerve abscess/impending palsy
  2. Severe form of type 2 reaction
12. Bites/stings/venom:
  1. Bite by insects of Hymenoptera species (bees, wasps, fire ants)
  2. Spider envenomation (black widow spider, brown recluse spider)
  3. Tick paralysis
  4. Jellyfish, sea anemones and coral stings
6
13. Metabolic disorders:
  1. Neonatal biotin deficiency
  2. Acrodermatitis enteropathica
14. Drug induced cutaneous necrosis:
  1. Warfarin/coumarin necrosis
  2. Heparin necrosis
  3. Tissue necrosis due to vasopressors
15. Acute graft vs. host disease
 
History
  • Prenatal history
  • Onset and course
  • Associated abnormalities
  • Provocation by sunlight
  • Topical exposure to potential allergen
  • Systemically administered drug before the onset of the condition.
 
Physical Examination
  • Extent of erythroderma/body surface area (BSA) of involvement
  • Areas of accentuation
  • Associated cutaneous changes (scalding, pustules and crusting)
  • Nail/hair/other congenital abnormalities
  • Color of the skin
    • Pallor: atopic dermatitis (AD)
    • Salmon red hue: pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP)
    • Orange hue: chronic lymphocytic leukemia
    • Bluish hue: lichenoid reaction.
  • Pattern of scaling
    • Ichthyosiform scaling: congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma (CIE), atopic dermatitis (AD), sarcoidosis, lymphoma, leukemia
  • Vesicles/bullae
    • Acute eczema
    • Pemphigus foliaceus.
    • Drug eruptions
    • Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis
    • Graft vs. host disease (GVHD)
  • Ulceration of the skin
    • Lymphoma
    • Leukemia
    • Histoplasmosis
  • Nail plate pitting (> 20 pittings on fingernails is suggestive of psoriasis)
  • Oral manifestations (lichen planus, drug eruption, histoplasmosis, Reiter's disease)7
  • Ocular manifestations (AD, Reiter's disease, sarcoidosis, histoplasmosis)
  • Joint manifestations (psoriasis, drug reactions, Reiter's disease, sarcoidosis)
  • Massive/asymptomatic lymphadenopathy
    • Lymphoma, leukemia, drug rash, sarcoidosis
  • Splenomegaly
    • Lymphoma/leukemia, drug reaction, sarcoidosis, histoplasmosis, Reiter's disease and GVHD
 
Laboratory Evaluation
  • Stain and culture for bacterial/fungal infections
  • Calcium levels (hypercalcemia: sarcoidosis)
  • Peripheral smear for Sezary cells (15 or > Sezary cells/100 lymphocytes: Sezary syndrome and actinic reticuloid)
  • Leukemic cells in peripheral smear
  • Screening for metabolic disorders
  • Blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/serum creatinine
  • Random blood sugar (RBS)/lipid profile
  • Serum electrolytes assay.
 
Skin Biopsy
Serial/multiple skin biopsies from representative areas: histopathological (HPE) and immunofluorescence (IMF) study.
 
Prognostic Criteria
SCORTEN (Table 1.3) is calculated as evaluation tool for prediction of prognosis of toxic epidemal necrolysis (TEN). Simplified acute physiological score (SAPS) is well correlated to the mortality rate of patients with acute skin failure. Indicators of poor prognosis are:
  • Age of the patient (extremes of the age)
  • Extent of skin lesions
  • Neutropenia
  • Elevated blood urea
  • Administration of high dose of steroids
 
Chest X-ray
Chest X-ray may be abnormal in sarcoidosis, histoplasmosis or malignancies. In drug induced erythroderma, patient may be screened with chest X-ray to rule out active pulmonary tuberculosis, and it may help in planning the treatment. Pulmonary involvement is the most severe systemic complication of TEN. An early chest X-ray would detect subclinical interstitial edema.8
Table 1.3   Severity illness score for TEN
Risk factors
Age
>40 years
Concurrent illness
Malignancy
Epidermal detachment
>30% body surface area
Serum urea
>28 mg /dl (>10 mmol / L)
Blood glucose level
> 252 mg / dl (> 14 mmol / L)
Sodium bicarbonate level
< 20 mEq / L (< 20 mmol / L)
Heart rate
> 120 beats / minute
Number of risk factors: 0-1, mortality rate 3.2%; 2, mortality rate 12.1%; 3, mortality rate 35.3%; 4, mortality rate 58.3%; ≥ 5, mortality rate 90%.
 
ACUTE SKIN FAILURE: AN OVERVIEW
Shuster was the first dermatologist to study the systemic effects of extensive skin diseases. Functions of skin are manifold ranging from forming a simple mechanical barrier to complex role as an immunological outpost and storehouse of hormonal activity. Alteration in these functions of skin due to extensive skin ailments may lead to significant morbidity and certain amount of mortality by different ways akin to acute failure of vital organs like kidney and liver. Prototype disease for understanding of acute skin failure (ASF) is TEN.
Evolution of the concept of ASF is based on the following:
  • Loss or derangement in the expected functions of skin.
  • Physiological and/or pathological consequences of dermatological conditions ranging from hereditary disorders of cornifications ending in erythroderma to drug induced TEN.
Irvine (1991) was the first person to define the skin failure as ‘loss of normal temperature control with inability to maintain the core body temperature and failure to prevent percutaneous loss of fluid, electrolytes and protein with resulting imbalance, and failure of mechanical barrier to prevent penetration of foreign materials’ and proposed that it was a real entity comparable to any other major organ system dysfunction.
The principal pathomechanism of ASF has been summarized in Figure 1.1.
ASF is comparable to any other major organ system dysfunction because of the following consequences:
  • Fluid and electrolyte imbalance
  • Protein and calorie loss
  • Impaired thermoregulation
  • Alteration in immunological function and infection
  • Systemic involvement.9
 
 
Fluid, Electrolyte and Protein Loss/Imbalance
Exudation of fluid, proteins and electrolytes occur due to loss of the outermost cover of the body. An average loss of 3 to 4 liters of fluid is estimated to occur in TEN involving 50% of the BSA. Significant protein loss is not seen with intact skin but occurs only when it is inflamed. Increased albumin excretion, increased catabolism and reduced synthesis may lead to hypoalbuminemia. All these losses may end up in hypotension and consequent renal failure.
 
Thermoregulation
Impaired control of skin blood flow and inability to sweat is observed in patients with extensive skin disease leading to impaired thermoregulation. Hypothermia may set in with shivering and calorie loss. A sudden drop in the patient's temperature may be the first sign of the ensuing sepsis.
 
Infection
Infection may be the major cause of mortality in extensive skin loss or involvement. Susceptibility to infection is due to impaired immune response, loss of barrier function of the skin, administration of steroids and use of other immunosuppressive drugs as therapeutic modality for primary skin conditions. Intravenous line through the affected skin may add to the problem. Fever itself may not be an indicator of secondary infection or sepsis.
Following may be the signs of sepsis:
  • Sudden drop in blood pressure
  • Drop in temperature
  • An altered consciousness
  • Oliguria.
zoom view
Figure 1.1: Principal pathomechanism involved in acute skin failure
10
 
Cardiovascular Complications
There may be left ventricular failure (LVF) because of increased blood flow through the skin and consequent increased cardiac output. Pre-existing ischemic heart disease in an elderly patient may lead to precipitation of pulmonary edema and may initiate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Interleukin-1 and Tumor necrosis factor-α mediated capillary leak in severe generalized pustular psoriasis has been reported to result RDS. Prolonged immobilization may be a predisposing factor for venous thrombosis.
 
Management of Acute Skin Failure
Management in DICU setup is desirable due to the anticipated complications and related mortality as follows:
  • Secondary infection and septicemia
  • Fluid and electrolyte imbalance
  • Hypovolemic shosck
  • Cardiovascular failure
  • Pulmonary edema
  • Disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Regular skin swab from different body sites should be taken to know the organism, which may be the cause of infection and to decide upon appropriate antibiotic. Antibiotics are indicated if there is sign of sepsis. Some authors administer broad spectrum antibiotics empirically, if there is leukopenia associated with TEN.
In the event of inadequate oral intake, nasogastric feeding is advised (in patients without any evidence of malabsorption). If intravenous fluid has to be administered, peripheral line should be through the uninvolved skin. Intravenous fluids administered at similar rate like patients with burn in a patient with ASF may end up with pulmonary edema. Hence, it is important to estimate fluid loss and requirement in each individual patient with ASF by repeated clinical assessment. In the first 24 hours, the fluid administration may be estimated according to the extent of skin loss.
Temperature control is an important issue in ASF. The room temperature should be increased to prevent shivering and calorie loss. This may be achieved by air conditioners or infrared light in resource poor setup. Optimum moisture can be maintained by boiling a large kettle in the corner of room.
Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring by pulse oximeter is preferred especially when the skin on the arms is involved (difficult to record blood pressure with sphygmomanometer). Close monitoring of urine output and vital parameters is essential.11
 
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT OF DERMATOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES
Management of ASF depends upon the causative disease. These must be treated in DICU setup to improve the outcome. Therapies to address the ‘loss of barrier function’, ‘fluid loss’, ‘impaired thermoregulation’ and ‘effective control of infection’ are mandatory to reduce the morbidity and mortality. Hourly monitoring of vitals, precise watch on patient's hemodynamics and culture/sensitivity data is essential. Nutritional supplementation in the form of high calorie protein rich alimentation by tube feeding, judicial use of antibiotics at the earliest direct or indirect signs of sepsis (avoiding prophylactic use of antibiotics) and managing the energy loss by maintaining the optimum thermal environment are the additional requirements in the effective management of ASF.
Multidisciplinary approach is called for to address all the known causes of mortality like secondary infection and septicemia, fluid and electrolyte imbalance, hypovolemic shock, cardiovascular failure, pulmonary edema and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Physicians, surgeons, pediatricians and anesthetists play important role in the management of patients with ASF. These goals can be achieved in a setup of DICU. Dermatologists need to know when and where to utilize the cross-consultation of fellow medical colleagues. It is also mandatory to know the basic minimum about the procedures necessary for revival of the patient in case need arises.
 
Role of Physician and Pediatrician
  • Consultation for systemic involvement
  • Consultation for pre-existing systemic disease
  • Consultation for advise regarding alternative drugs for pre-existing systemic disease (especially in cases with drug reactions)
  • Consultation for fluid and electrolyte therapy
  • Consultation for nutritional therapy
  • Consultation for medical complications and emergencies.
 
Role of Surgeon
  • Consultation for surgical complications and emergencies
  • Venesection
  • Wound debridement.
 
Role of Anesthetist
  • Endotracheal intubation
  • Central venous catheterization
  • Arterial catheterization
  • Mechanical ventilation.
12
In conclusion, patients with dermatological emergencies deserve special attention and management protocol. Establishment of DICU is a positive step towards achieving this goal. Organization of a dedicated and coordinated multi-specialty member team is the essential initial step for establishment of DICU. Various stages of establishment of DICU has been discussed in chapter 7.
 
SUGGESTED FURTHER READING
  1. Dunnill MGS, Handfield-Jones SE, Treacher D, Mcgibbon DH. Dermatology in the intensive care unit. Br J Dermatol 1995;132:226–35.
  1. Freiman A, Borsuk D, Sasseville D. Dermatologic emergencies. CMAJ 2005;173:1318–19.
  1. George SM, Harrison DA, Welch CA, Nolan KM, Friedmann PS. Dermatological conditions in intensive care: a secondary analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme Database. Critical Care 2008;12:S1.
  1. Gerull R, Nelle M, Schaible T. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome: A review. Crit Care Med 2011;39:1521–32.
  1. Inamadar AC, Palit A. Acute skin failure: concept, causes, consequences and care. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2005;71:379–85.
  1. Irvine C. ‘Skin failure’—a real entity: discussion paper. J R Soc Med 1991;84:412–3.
  1. Lehnhardt M, Jafari HJ, Druecke D, Steinstraesser L, Steinau HU, Klatte W, et al. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of protein loss in human burn wounds. Burns 2005;31:159–67.
  1. Roujeau JC, Revuz J. Intensive care in dermatology. In: Champion RH, Pye RJ, editors. Recent advances in dermatology, No 8. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;  1990. p-85–100.
  1. Shuster S. Systemic effects of skin disease. Lancet 1967;1:907–12.
  1. Sigurdsson V, Toonstra J, Hezemans-Boer M, van Vloten WA. Erythroderma. A clinical and follow-up study of 102 patients, with special emphasis on survival. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:53–7.
  1. Vonderheid E. Chronic generalized erythroderma. In: Lebwohl M, editor. Difficult diagnoses in dermatology. New York: Churchill Livingstone;  1988. p-89–100.