Clinical OCT Angiography Atlas Bruno Lumbroso, David Huang, Andre Romano, Marco Rispoli, Ching J Chen, Yali Jia, Nadia K Waheed
INDEX
×
Chapter Notes

Save Clear


1Technology and Interpretation
Section Outline
Section 1: Methods and Techniques of OCT Angiography Examination
  • Principles of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
  • Interpretation of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
  • Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: Terminology
  • Techniques for Using OCT Angiography for Clinical Examination
  • Clinical Applications of OCT SSADA Angiography in Everyday Clinical Practice
Section 2: OCT Angiography Examination of Structure and Histology
  • Retinal Normal Vascularization2

Principles of Optical Coherence Tomography AngiographyCHAPTER 1

David Huang,
Yali Jia,
Simon S Gao
 
INTRODUCTION
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become part of the standard of care in ophthalmology. It provides cross-sectional and three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the anterior segment, retina, and optic nerve head with micrometer-scale depth resolution. Structural OCT enhances the clinician's ability to detect and monitor fluid exudation associated with vascular diseases. It, however, is unable to directly detect capillary dropout or pathologic vessel growth (neovascularization) that constitutes the major vascular change associated with two leading causes of blindness, age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. These features, among other vascular abnormalities, are assessed clinically using fluorescein or indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. To overcome conventional structural OCT's inability to provide direct blood flow information, several OCT angiography methods have been developed.
 
OCT ANGIOGRAPHY
Initially, Doppler OCT angiography methods were investigated for the visualization and measurement of blood flow.1-6 Because Doppler OCT is sensitive only to motion parallel to the OCT probe beam, it is limited in its ability to image retinal and choroidal circulation, which are predominantly perpendicular to the OCT beam. An alternative approach has been speckle based OCT angiography. It has advantages over Doppler-based techniques because it uses the variation of the speckle pattern in time to detect both transverse and axial flow with similar sensitivities. Amplitude-based,7-9 phase-based,10 or combined amplitude + phase11 variance methods have been described.
 
Split-Spectrum Amplitude: Decorrelation Angiography
We developed an amplitude-based method called split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA). The SSADA algorithm detects motion in blood vessel lumen by measuring the variation in reflected OCT signal amplitude between consecutive cross-sectional scans. Decorrelation is a mathematical function that quantifies variation without being affected by the average signal strength, as long as the signal is strong enough to predominate over optical and electronic noise. This novelty of SSADA lies in how the OCT signal is processed to enhance flow detection and reject axial bulk motion noise. Specifically, the algorithm splits the OCT image into different spectral bands, thus increasing the number of usable image frames. Each new frame has a lower axial resolution that is less susceptible to axial eye motion caused by retrobulbar pulsation. This lower resolution also translates to a wider coherence gate over which reflected signal from a moving particle such as a blood cell can interfere with adjacent structures, thereby increasing speckle contrast. In addition, each spectral band contains a different speckle pattern and independent information on flow. When amplitude decorrelation images from multiple spectral bands are combined, the flow signal is increased. Compared to the full-spectrum amplitude method, SSADA using four-fold spectral splits improved the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by a factor of two, which is equivalent to reducing the scan time by a factor of four.12 More recent SSADA implementations use even more than a four-fold split to further enhance the SNR of flow detection. As shown by an example from en face angiograms of the macular retinal circulation collected using a commercial 70 kHz 840 nm spectral OCT (Figs 1.1A to H), SSADA provides a clean and continuous microvascular network and less noise just inside the foveal avascular zone (FAZ).
Since OCT angiography generates 3D data, segmentation and en face presentation of the flow information can aid in reducing data complexity and serve to reproduce the more traditional view of dye-based angiography. As seen in Figure 1.1, the retinal angiogram (Figs 1.1B to D) represents the decorrelation or flow information between the internal limiting membrane and the outer plexiform layer. Segmentation performed on the cross-sectional, structural OCT images (Fig. 1.1E) can directly be applied to the OCT angiography images (Figs 1.1F and G).4
zoom view
Figs 1.1A to H: Comparison of structural OCT (A, E) and amplitude-decorrelation angiograms of the macula (3 x 3 mm area) using full spectrum (B, F), split-spectrum (C, G), and split-spectrum averaged angiograms from one X-fast and one F-fast scans after 3D registration (D, H). En face maximum decorrelation projections of retinal circulation showed less noise inside the foveal avascular zone (FAZ, within green dotted circles) and more continuous perifoveal vascular networks using the SSADA algorithm (C) compared to standard full-spectrum algorithm (B). The cross-sectional angiograms (scanned across the red dashed line in B and C) showed more clearly delineated retinal vessels (red arrows in G) and less noise using the SSADA algorithm (G) compared to the standard (F). There are saccadic motion artifacts that appear as artifactual horizontal lines in (B, C). This and other motion artifacts are removed using the 3D registration algorithm that registers a horizontal-priority (X-fast) and a vertical-priority (Y-fast) raster scans to remove motion error. The algorithm then merges the X-fast and Y-fast scans to produce a merged 3D OCT angiogram that shows a continuous artifact-free microvascular network in (D). The registration and averaging of two orthogonal scans also removed motion blur and further improved SNR, allowing the visualization of a greater number of distinct small retinal vessels (microvascular network in D, red arrows in H).
The en face angiograms were generated by projecting the maximum decorrelation or flow value for each transverse position within the segmented depth range, representing the fastest flowing vessel lumen in the segmented tissue layers. In healthy eyes, the retinal angiogram shows a vascular network around the FAZ. The layers of the retina and choroid can be more finely separated to provide additional information to define diagnostic parameters of vascular defects. This will be discussed in Chapter 2.
 
Relationship Between Decorrelation and Velocity
To determine how the decorrelation or flow signal produced by the SSADA algorithm relates to flow velocity, phantom experiments were performed.13 The study showed that SSADA is sensitive to both axial and transverse flow, with a slightly higher sensitivity for the axial component. For clinical retinal imaging where the OCT beam is approximately perpendicular to the vasculature, the SSADA signal can be considered to be independent of the small variation in beam incidence angle for all practical purposes. In addition, it was found that decorrelation was linearly related to velocity over a limited range. A higher decorrelation value thus implies higher velocity flow. This range is dependent on the time scale of the SSADA measurement. With a 70 kHz spectral OCT system and 200+ A-scans per cross-sectional B-scan, SSADA should be sensitive to even the slowest flow at the capillary level, where flow speeds have been estimated at between 0.4 to 3 mm/s.14,15 In larger vessels with higher velocities, the SSADA signal reaches a maximum value (saturates).
 
Comparison to Fluorescein and Indocyanine Green Angiography
Compared to fluorescein or ICG angiography, the gold standards of retinal vascular imaging, OCT angiography has a number of advantages and differences. SSADA can be acquired in a few seconds and does not require intravenous injection, whereas fluorescein or ICG angiography requires multiple image frames taken over several minutes and can cause nausea, vomiting, and, albeit rarely, anaphylaxis.16 The fast and noninvasive nature of OCT angiography also means that follow-up scans can be conducted more frequently.
Dye leakage in fluorescein angiography is the hallmark of important vascular abnormalities such as neovascularization and microaneurysms. OCT angiography does not employ a dye and cannot evaluate leakage. OCT angiography detects vascular abnormalities by other methods based on depth and vascular pattern. Choroidal neovascularization is characterized by distinct vascular patterns present above the retinal pigment epithelium (Type II) or between the Bruch's membrane and the retinal pigment epithelium (Type I). Because dye leakage and staining do not occur in OCT angiography, the boundaries, and 5therefore areas, of capillary dropout and neovascularization can be more precisely measured. The visualization of intraretinal and subretinal fluid accumulation on structural OCT may provide information analogous to fluid leakage. Thus, although the lack of dye leakage is a limitation of OCT angiography, other ways of detecting vascular abnormality more than make up for this deficit. Furthermore, conventional angiography is two-dimensional, which makes it difficult to distinguish vascular abnormalities within different layers. The 3D nature of OCT angiography allows for separate evaluation of abnormalities in the retinal and choroidal circulations.
 
Limitations of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
OCT angiography has several limitations. First, shadowgraphic flow projection artifact makes the interpretation of en face angiograms of deeper vascular beds more difficult. These artifacts are a result of fluctuating shadows cast by flowing blood in a superficial vascular layer that cause variation of the OCT signal in deeper, highly reflective layers. The flow projection artifact from the retinal circulation can be seen clearly on the bright retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). This artifact can be removed by software processing. The projection from the retinal circulation is relatively sparse and can be removed from deeper layers fairly effectively. However, the choriocapillaris is nearly confluent, and its projection and shadow effects are difficult to remove from deeper choroidal layers. A second limitation is the fading of OCT and flow signal in large vessels due to the interferometric fringe washout effect associated with very fast blood flow, especially the axial flow component.17 This means that central retinal vessels in the disc and large vessels in the deep choroid cannot be visualized using SSADA. Third, the scan area of OCT angiography is relatively small (3×3 to 6×6 mm). Larger-area angiograms of high quality can be achieved, but require higher speed OCT systems that are not yet commercially available.18 Lastly, because OCT angiography best resolves pathology when viewed as en face angiograms of anatomic layers, practical clinical applications require accurate segmentation software. Post-processing software is also needed to reduce motion and projection artifacts. The need for these sophisticated algorithms means OCT angiography still has much room to improve in the foreseeable future.
 
COMPARING SWEPT-SOURCE AND SPECTRAL OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
The SSADA algorithm was initially implemented on a custom-built 100 kHz 1050 nm wavelength swept-source OCT system. To generate high quality angiograms (Fig. 1.2A), 8 consecutive cross-sectional scans at each position were necessary. A scan pattern of 200 cross-sectional scan positions each with 200 axial scans was used. The overall angiographic scan pattern had 200 × 200 transverse points. 200 × 200 × 8 axial scans were acquired in 3.5 seconds.
The commercial implementation of SSADA uses a 70 kHz 840 nm wavelength spectral OCT system (RTVue XR Avanti, Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA). Although the systems acquire fewer axial scans per second, high quality angiograms with more transverse points (304 × 304, Fig. 1.2B) are produced in less time (2.9 seconds). The higher performance is due to the lower decorrelation noise on the spectral OCT system, which only requires 2 consecutive cross-sectional scans at one position to compute a reliable decorrelation image. The higher transverse scan density, along with a higher transverse resolution associated with the shorter wavelength, means that the Avanti produces retinal angiograms with higher definition and higher resolution than the swept-source OCT prototype we originally used (Figs 1.2 C and D).6
zoom view
Figs 1.2A to D: Comparison of 3 × 3 mm macular angiograms from a 100 kHz swept-source OCT system (A) and 70 kHz spectral OCT system (B). Zoomed-in views shows improve capillary detail from the spectral OCT system (D) as compared to the swept-source OCT system (C).
REFERENCES
  1. Wang RK, et al. Three dimensional optical angiography. Opt Express. 2007;15:4083–97.
  1. Grulkowski I, et al. Scanning protocols dedicated to smart velocity ranging in Spectral OCT. Opt Express. 2009;17:23736–54.
  1. Yu L, Chen Z. Doppler variance imaging for three-dimensional retina and choroid angiography. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15:016029.
  1. Makita S, Jaillon F, Yamanari M, Miura M, Yasuno Y. Comprehensive in vivo micro-vascular imaging of the human eye by dual-beam-scan Doppler optical coherence angiography. Optics Express. 2011;19:1271–83.
  1. Zotter S, et al. Visualization of microvasculature by dual-beam phase-resolved Doppler optical coherence tomography. Optics Express. 2011; 19:1217–27.
  1. Braaf B, Vermeer KA, Vienola KV, de Boer JF. Angiography of the retina and the choroid with phase-resolved OCT using interval-optimized backstitched B-scans. Optics Express. 2012;20:20516–34.
  1. Mariampillai A, et al. Speckle variance detection of microvasculature using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett. 2008;33: 1530–2.
  1. Motaghiannezam R, Fraser S. Logarithmic intensity and speckle-based motion contrast methods for human retinal vasculature visualization using swept source optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt Express. 2012;3:503–21.
  1. Enfield J, Jonathan E, Leahy M. In vivo imaging of the microcirculation of the volar forearm using correlation mapping optical coherence tomography (cmOCT). Biomed. Opt Express. 2011;2:1184–93.
  1. Fingler J, Zawadzki RJ, Werner JS, Schwartz D, Fraser SE. Volumetric microvascular imaging of human retina using optical coherence tomography with a novel motion contrast technique. Opt Express. 2009; 17:22190–200.
  1. Liu G, Lin AJ, Tromberg BJ, Chen Z. A comparison of Doppler optical coherence tomography methods. Biomed. Opt Express. 2012;3:2669–80.
  1. Jia Y, et al. Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2012;20:4710–25.
  1. Tokayer J, Jia Y, Dhalla AH, Huang D. Blood flow velocity quantification using split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 201341909–24. doi:10.1364/BOE.4.001909 193860 [pii].7
  1. Riva CE, Petrig B. Blue field entoptic phenomenon and blood velocity in the retinal capillaries. J Opt Soc Am. 1980;70:1234–8.
  1. Tam J, Tiruveedhula P, Roorda A. Characterization of single-file flow through human retinal parafoveal capillaries using an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Biomed Opt Express. 20112781–93. doi:10.1364/BOE.2.000781.
  1. Lopez-Saez M, et al. Fluorescein-induced allergic reaction. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. 199881428–3. .
  1. Hendargo HC, McNabb RP, Dhalla AH, Shepherd N, Izatt JA. Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography. Biomedical Optics Express. 2011;2:2175–88.
  1. Blatter C, et al. Ultrahigh-speed non-invasive widefield angiography. BIOMEDO. 2012;17:0705051–3.