INTRODUCTION
According to the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, if there is a failure to achieve pregnancy within 12 months of unprotected sexual intercourse or therapeutic donor insemination in women ˂35 years or within 6 months if women ˃35 years is considered as “infertility”.1,2 Incidence of infertility is approximately up to 15% of couples (one in six couples).3
WHEN TO SEEK HELP OF FERTILITY EXPERT?
- Couples as per above definition
- Couples having a high risk of infertility.
INDICATIONS OF IMMEDIATE EVALUATION FOR INFERTILITY4
- Age of women ˃40 years
- Age of women ˃35 years and failed attempts of 6 months
- If any of the following conditions:
- Oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea
- Known or suspected uterine/tubal/peritoneal disease
- Stage III or stage IV endometriosis
- Known or suspected male infertility
- Previous history of surgery of reproductive organs.
CAUSES OF INFERTILITY
It is very important to offer detailed information and counseling to couples facing problems to conceive, as a part of the evaluation. Because the anxiety related to infertility tends to cause more stress, decreased libido and thus complicating the issue, thorough counseling plays a vital part in managing cases of infertility.8
Work-up of infertility should be carried out for both the partners at the same time and it should involve ruling out all the etiologies one by one (Table 2)2.
|
FEMALE EVALUATION
History
Clinical history involves following points which generally direct further investigations:3
- Age of the female partner
- Coinhabiting the partner or not/trying since when?
- Duration of infertility
- Prior evaluation and its results
- History of prior treatment of infertility
- Menstrual history: Cycle length, regularity, duration and amount of the flow, pain associated with cycle, and premenstrual symptoms
- Obstetric history: Prior pregnancies and outcomes, time taken to conceive, fertility treatment for conception, complications, and mode of delivery
- History of contraception
- Sexual history: Timing and frequency of intercourse, any sexual dysfunction
- Gynecological history: History of polycystic ovarian syndrome, pelvic inflammatory disease, sexually transmitted disease, endometriosis, and fibroids
- Medical history: History of any illness, hospitalization, long-term medications, and allergies
- Surgical history: Previous history of surgeries, especially abdominal and pelvic procedures, indication, surgical details, and outcomes
- History of thyroid disease, galactorrhea, hirsutism, dyspareunia, and pelvic or abdominal pain
- Family history: History of medical problems, birth defects, developmental delay, early menopause, any fertility-related issues
- Occupational history, any known environmental hazard
- Substance abuse: Tobacco or nicotine-related products, alcohol, and recreational drugs.
Physical Examination
It includes general examination, pelvic examination, and thyroid and breast examination.
- General examination: Vitals (pulse and blood pressure) and body mass index (BMI) (height and weight)
- Thyroid examination: Nodule, enlargement, or tenderness
- Breast examination: Any secretions, its character, and nodularity
- Signs of androgen excess
- Tanner staging of breast, axillary, and pubic hairs (in cases of amenorrhea)
- Pelvic examinations: Vaginal and cervical secretions or abnormality; uterine size, shape, position, mobility, pelvic, or adnexal mass, tenderness, pouch of Douglas—tenderness and nodularity.
Fig. 1: Evaluation related to etiology of infertility. (FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone)
Evaluation Related to Etiology of Infertility (Fig. 1)
These tests focus on structured problems, ovulatory dysfunction, and ovarian reserve. These include laboratory and imaging tests. Even though cervical factor plays minor role, test for evaluation of cervical mucus is not reliable and is not helpful for management of infertility in clinical practice.6
Tests of Ovarian Reserve
Ovarian reserve represents number of oocytes available for potential fertilization at a point of time. It predicts response to ovarian stimulation.9 The tests of ovarian reserve are interpreted in the background of patient's age.
Hormonal Tests for Ovarian Reserve
- Day 2 to day 5 serum estradiol and serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH):
- Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH): AMH is produced by granulosa cells of preantral and antral follicles thus it specifically correlates with egg reserve. It does not fluctuate in the menstrual cycle so can be assessed on any day of the cycle.11,12 AMH and antral follicle count (AFC) has the similar abilities to predict ovarian stimulation response and live birth.9
- Ultrasound assessment AFC:
- AFC is the number of follicles measuring between 2 and 10 mm diameter in the ovaries on a transvaginal sonography done during baseline scan.
- But AFC is relatively poor indication for prediction of future fertility.10
- AFC is elevated in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and decreased in women with hypothalamic amenorrhea and those taking hormonal contraceptive pills14
Ovarian reserve tests are good predictors of response to ovarian stimulation but poor results do not necessarily predict inability to achieve a live birth.3,15,16
Tests for Ovulatory Dysfunction
Generally menstrual history is enough to predict ovulatory function. Majority of ovulatory cycles will have regular menstrual periods between 25 and 35 days along with premenstrual symptoms. Even with the regular cycle, up to one-third of women may be anovulatory. So, ovulation needs to be confirmed with various tests.17
Ovulation can be objectively detected by:
- Cervical mucus changes
- Biphasic basal body temperature
- Positive luteinizing hormone kit
- Midluteal progesterone measurement.
In women of regular menstrual cycles, serum progesterone is tested at day 21 for confirmation of ovulation.8 In women with irregular cycles, testing is done 7 days prior to presumed date of onset of periods and repeated weekly till periods resume. Ovulation is confirmed with progesterone level of 5 ng/mL or more.6,18
In cases of anovulation; obesity, hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction, PCOS, and other causes have to be ruled out.
- Thyroid disease and hyperprolactinemia can cause ovulatory dysfunction ranging from luteal phase insufficiency, oligomenorrhea to anovulation, and amenorrhea.
- In women with ovarian insufficiency or failure on elevated FSH level before 40 years, fragile X carrier screening is recommended to rule out FMR 1 gene premutation.21
Tests of Tubal Factor (Fig. 3)
- Hysterosalpingography (HSG): It is most commonly used procedure for determining tubal patency. Radio-opaque contrast medium is injected through the cervix. Uterus and tubes are evaluated through fluoroscopy. It can detect proximal and distal tubal occlusions, peritubal adhesions, and salpingitis isthmica nodosa.Following are predictive values of HSG for demonstrating tubal patency:22
- Positive predictive value 38%
- Negative predictive value 94%
As it has low positive predictive value, HSG showing nonpatency of tube may require further tests like laparoscopy to confirm tubal occlusion.23 - Hysterosalpingo-Contrast-Sonography (HyCoSy): In this test, contrast agent with air bubbles is used for visualization of tubes sonographically. The agents used are perflutren lipid microsphere as well as agitated saline. Accuracy of this test is more dependent on operator experience. Its sensitivity for determining tubal patency ranges from 76 to 96% and specificity ranges from 67 to 100%.24,25
- Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy: Women with risk factors for tubal obstruction like endometriosis, previous pelvic infection, or ectopic pregnancy might require laparoscopy to rule out other pelvic pathology. It allows diagnosis and treatment at the same time for structural abnormalities of uterus like fibroids.
Tests for Uterine Factor (Fig. 4)
Uterine factors contributing to infertility are endometrial polyp, intrauterine adhesions, submucous fibroids, and Müllerian anomalies.
- Transvaginal ultrasonography: It helps in detection of fibroids distorting endometrial cavity. Use of three-dimensional ultrasonography improves detection of Müllerian anomalies and is comparable to pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for accurate diagnosis of this condition.26
- Sonohysterography: It can be used to diagnose endometrial polyps, submucous fibroids, and intrauterine adhesions. It has 91% sensitivity and 84% specificity for diagnosing polyp or fibroid.
- HSG: It has limited ability to diagnose uterine cavity masses or adhesions as these structures are not radio-opaque. It has only 50% sensitivity for diagnosing polypoid lesions.27
- Hysteroscopy: It is the most definitive method of diagnosis as well as treatment of endometrial polyps, intrauterine adhesions, and submucous fibroids. Though it is not used as first-line test, it is indicated to confirm and treat intracavity lesions detected by other imaging techniques.
Other Tests
- Postcoital cervical mucus test is no longer recommended as it cannot predict the inability to conceive as well as it does not affect clinical treatment of patient.28
EVALUATION OF MALE
About 40–50% of infertile couples may have male factor infertility.29 Minimum evaluation of male includes reproductive history and semen analysis.30 Any abnormalities in basic evaluation requires examination by specialist—reproductive urologist or andrologist.30
History
Following key points are noted in history:30
- Duration of infertility
- Prior fertility
- Coital frequency and timing
- Any evidence of sexual dysfunction including erectile or ejaculatory problems
- Developmental history
- Childhood illness
- History of previous surgery (e.g., cryptorchidism with or without surgery)
- Medication use e.g., anabolic steroids and supplements like testosterone
- History of sexually transmitted diseases
- History of allergies
- History of exposure to gonadal trauma or toxins
- Smoking, alcohol, or substance abuse.
Physical Examination
- General examination:
- Built, height, weight, and BMI
- Hair distribution
- Rule out any gynecomastia
|
Semen Analysis
It is the quantitative microscopic evaluation of sperm parameters. Semen sample is obtained by masturbation in laboratory collection room with 2–5 days of abstinence. As sperm generation time is just over 2 months, it is recommended to wait for 3 months before repeat sampling.8
The WHO 2010 guidelines are currently followed for determining normality of semen parameters (Table 3).31
Abnormalities in Semen Analysis
- Oligospermia: Sperm count ˂15 million per mL
- Asthenozoospermia: Total sperm motility ˂40% or rapid progressive motility ˂32%
- Teratozoospermia: Normal morphology ˂4% (as per strict Krugerberg criteria)
- If an individual has all three low sperm conditions, it is known as oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) syndrome, which is typically associated with an increased likelihood of genetic etiology of the infertility.
- Azoospermia: Absence of sperms in semen
In cases of abnormal semen parameters further evaluation is needed. Hypogonadism is suspected when there is oligospermia or azoospermia.
- Primary hypogonadism: Decreased level of total testosterone (morning level) and increased level of FSH
- Secondary hypogonadism: Decreased level of total testosterone and decreased level of FSH (normal ranges: total testosterone—240–950 ng/dL; FSH—1.5–12.4 mIU/mL).
Sperm Deoxyribonucleic Acid Fragmentation Index
The integrity of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) present in the sperm is very crucial for the process of fertilization and normal embryo development. It has been observed that the sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is higher in infertile men compared to fertile men. When the DNA which carries the genetic material with all the instructions to the baby is fragmented, it can lead to poor fertilization, poor embryo development, and miscarriage. Also, if the fertilization happens with the DNA fragmented sperm, there is a high risk of genetic disease in the baby.
Fragmented DNA is usually can be caused by various reasons such as:
- Infection
- Smoking and alcohol
- Use of recreational drugs and medications
- Stress
- Increased BMI and poor diet
- Exposure to toxins and radiation
- Advanced age
- Varicocele (enlarged veins inside the scrotum)
- Increased testicular temperature.
Semen analysis is the standard test to assess the sperm quality. But it is not a fool proof test as it neither provides information regarding all the sperm functions nor the fertility potential of sperm. In addition to semen analysis, SDF test can be done to measure the sperm integrity and the damage to the DNA.
Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index (%)
- 15% or less fragmentation—excellent sperm DNA integrity
- 15–25% DNA fragmentation index (DFI)—good to fair
- 25–50% DFI—fair to poor
- 50% or greater DFI—extremely poor sperm DNA integrity.
Other Tests
- Semen culture: Assessment of semen sample for bacterial infections:
- It is indicated in patients with clinical signs of genitourinary infections or leukocytes ˃1 million/mL in semen analysis.
- Hormonal evaluation: Assessment of FSH, LH, and testosterone levels
- It is indicated in patients showing abnormal semen parameters like severe OAT or azoospermia.
- Genetic testing—karyotyping, Y chromosome microdeletion, single gene defect testing, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) mutation:
- Genetic testing is done when examination is showing Klinefelter phenotype (small testes, tall stature, gynecomastia, and learning disabilities)
- Y chromosome microdeletion is done in cases of azoospermia or severe oligoasthenospermia.
- Testicular biopsy:
- It is done in cases of azoospermia (to know the cause of nonobstructive azoospermia by histology of testicular tissue).
Postcoital testing and antisperm antibody testing are not considered useful in male evaluation.28,32
Unexplained infertility may be diagnosed in as many as 30% of infertile couples. At a minimum, these patients should have evidence of ovulation, tubal patency, and a normal semen analysis.
Principles of Evaluation
- It should be systematic, expeditious, and cost-effective manner.
- It should identify all relevant factors.
- The initial emphasis should be on least invasive methods for detection of most common causes.
- The investigations which are chosen should be tailored to the needs of the individual patient.
REFERENCES
- Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:63.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. reVitalize. Gynecology data definitions (version 1.0). Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2017.
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e44-50.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Female age-related fertility decline. Committee Opinion No. 589. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:719-21.
- Gutmacher AF. Factors effecting normal expectancy of conception. J Am Med Assoc. 1956;161(9):855-60.
- Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(2):302-7.
- Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, Lansac J, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988-1989). Hum Reprod. 1991;6(6):811-6.
- National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. London, United Kingdom: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2013. pp. 1-63.
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e9-17.
- Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:685-718.
- La Marca A, Stabile G, Artenisio AC, Volpe A. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:3103-7.
- Gracia CR, Shin SS, Prewitt M, Chamberlin JS, Lofaro LR, Jones KL, et al. Multi-center clinical evaluation of the Access AMH assay to determine AMH levels in reproductive age women during normal menstrual cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:777-83.
- Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of “poor response” to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1616-24.
- D'Arpe S, Di Feliciantonio M, Candelieri M, Franceschetti S, Piccioni MG, Bastianelli C. Ovarian function during hormonal contraception assessed by endocrine and sonographic markers: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;33:436-48.
- Scott RT Jr, Elkind-Hirsch KE, Styne-Gross A, Miller KA, Frattarelli JL. The predictive value for in vitro fertility delivery rates is greatly impacted by the method used to select the threshold between normal and elevated basal follicle-stimulating hormone. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:868-78.
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 773: The use of antimüllerian hormone in women not seeking fertility care. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:275-9.
- Prior JC, Naess M, Langhammer A, Forsmo S. Ovulation prevalence in women with spontaneous normal-length menstrual cycles—a population-based cohort from HUNT3, Norway. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134473.
- Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mellows HJ. WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 194. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:e157-71.
- Committee Opinion No. 691: Carrier screening for genetic conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e41-55.
- Coutifaris C, Myers ER, Guzick DS, Diamond MP, Carson SA, Legro RS, et al. Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(5):1264-72.
- Technology Assessment No. 12: Sonohysterography. Ob stet Gynecol. 2016;128:38-42.
- Luciano DE, Exacoustos C, Luciano AA. Contrast ultrasonography for tubal patency. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:994-8.
- Maheux-Lacroix S, Boutin A, Moore L, Bergeron ME, Bujold E, Laberge P, et al. Hysterosalpingosonography for diagnosing tubal occlusion in subfertile women: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:953-63.
- Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Ubeda B, Rodriguez I, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultra- sound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:616-22.
- Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:406-11.
- Oei SG, Helmerhorst FM, Bloemenkamp KW, Hollants FA, Meerpoel DE, Keirse MJ. Effectiveness of the postcoital test: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1998;317(7157):502-5.
- Kumar RM, Shahul S. Role of breast-feeding in transmission of hepatitis C virus to infants of HCV-infected mothers. J Hepatol. 1998;29:191-7.
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e18-25.
- Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Gordon Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(3):231-45.
- Kamel RM. Management of the infertile couple: an evidence-based protocol. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:21.